Islam's Conquest of Europe

These Baltic areas were Christian at one time until they suffered the same ordeal as Western Europe is suffering now. An invasion of Muslims.

Wow, it's true, most Americans are ignorant about geography! Young Americans Geographically Illiterate, Survey Suggests If they weren't they would know, for example, that those countries mentioned are located in the Balkan region of Southern Europe and not around the Baltic Sea, in the North. Just like they know nothing of geography, it is also evident they have no idea about what's happening in Europe.
 
Yeah that damn Bush. Now back to the "Arab Spring" Obama/Hillary praised funded and armed. The Syrian Civil war was no "spring" and it didn't arise in or from Iraq. It was a rebellion by the Free Syrian Army which was funded by western liberals and lionized by the western press. No Iraqis were involved.
Janes Defense Weekly reports the Obama administration supplied over 900 tons of weapons to the conflict in one Dec 2015 shipment alone.
Operation "Timber Sycamore" was personally authorized by Hussein Obama to train any and all terrorist groups in Syria as early as 2012.
According to Salon Sept 20 2016 issue much of the weapons ended up with Al Qaeda and ISIS.
And, as we know, the FSA itself mostly defected to ISIS with their CIA training and weapons.
And why was this done? Some of it was simply amateur hour at the White House. But according to the Baltimore Sun it was driven mostly by a desire to weaken Russian allies in the region.
That hatred of Slavs has sure worked out well hasn't it?
Basically repeat the above for Libya and Tunisia.

But Bush.....but Bush...

Bush is gone and his true colors shown as an Obama/Clinton supporter. But he didn't destabilize Syria and Libya and send wave after wave of Muslims to Europe. He only backed the ones who did.
 
Or instead of "but but Bush" maybe you could say "What difference, at this point, does it make?" After all we know the *real* cause was a cheap video. Right?
 
Yeah that damn Bush. Now back to the "Arab Spring" Obama/Hillary praised funded and armed. The Syrian Civil war was no "spring" and it didn't arise in or from Iraq. It was a rebellion by the Free Syrian Army which was funded by western liberals and lionized by the western press. No Iraqis were involved.
Janes Defense Weekly reports the Obama administration supplied over 900 tons of weapons to the conflict in one Dec 2015 shipment alone.
Operation "Timber Sycamore" was personally authorized by Hussein Obama to train any and all terrorist groups in Syria as early as 2012.
According to Salon Sept 20 2016 issue much of the weapons ended up with Al Qaeda and ISIS.
And, as we know, the FSA itself mostly defected to ISIS with their CIA training and weapons.
And why was this done? Some of it was simply amateur hour at the White House. But according to the Baltimore Sun it was driven mostly by a desire to weaken Russian allies in the region.
That hatred of Slavs has sure worked out well hasn't it?
Basically repeat the above for Libya and Tunisia.

But Bush.....but Bush...

Bush is gone and his true colors shown as an Obama/Clinton supporter. But he didn't destabilize Syria and Libya and send wave after wave of Muslims to Europe. He only backed the ones who did.

Fine, you don't get it and you will try and make history fit your view of the world.

You forget that Assad is a dictator, to simply get up and start a civil war takes a little more than "oh, fuck me, I've got a headache, I know, I'll start a civil war today"

Where did the weapons come from? Some from the Armed Forces of Syria. Some from Turkey, but Iraq had seen insurgency for a long time. You think this just didn't have anything to do with it?
 
It is an invasion, an invasion need not be military initially. Just as the European Jew invasion of Palestine. When the Muslim invaders begin to claim a Muslim state in Europe, the Europeans could end up like the Palestinians. Ruled by stealthy foreign invaders.
Here we go. Talk about the sky being blue and this antisemite will somehow brings the Jews into it. :cuckoo:

It's the most recent example of what happens when you let in a large number of refugees who intend to take over. It has nothing to do with the religion of the refugees.
The seeds of the crisis in Europe started many decades before the Iraq war in 2003. They were naive into thinking by letting in all these Turks, Arabs, Pakistanis, Somalis, and North African Muslims they would assimilate and accept the cultures and laws of the countries they settled into. That has clearly not happened and now they're paying the price.

As the Palestinians paid the price by not immediately offering resistance to the Jewish invasion. Now they are paying the price. Why can't you understand that it's the same dynamic.
Because it isn't. Arabs have always been the invaders and looters. Tell the truth for once.
 
Most of the refugees are just looking at not being killed in a war which wouldn't have happened if the US hadn't have invaded Iraq and then messed up the post war period.

You can create your own chaos so that you can then fight back against it (all the while making your friends in the defense industry extremely rich).

I agree. Except it wasn't Iraq. There were no huge waves of refugees from Iraq. It was the Husain Obama/Hillary Clinton/Merkel "Arab Spring". They left the Middle East in flames and then welcomed refugees to outvote and outbreed their own citizens.
Their "spring" killed hundreds of thousands.

All of this is interconnected. The Arab Spring didn't just happen out of nothing, you know.

The destabilization of Iraq played a massive part. Iraq and Syria are like brother countries, at one point they nearly become one country, except that neither dictator was willing to hand over control of their part for the greater good of Pan-Baathism.

Without Iraq, Syria would never have got itself into a civil war. Which means most of the refugees wouldn't have been refugees.
Syria was yet another country of the disastrous Obama sponsored "Arab Spring", stop spouting leftie talking points. The mess we see today is a direct result of of the catastrophic Obama presidency.
 
Looks like we elected Trump just in time. Eurabia is, as its liberal overlords planned, probably past saving.
Then again you never know. The Muslims have invaded Europe several times and been eventually kicked back out.
View attachment 120304

On the other hand there have been Muslims in Europe for a long time, Kosovo, Albania, Turkey (part of it), Bosnia etc are either Muslim or have large Muslim populations.

so true----Monte agrees that the arab muslims streamed out of Arabia and
INVADED lots of places and STILL OCCUPY upon the land that they stole.
LAND THIEVES that they are
 
The population that the Arabian peninsula (a desert with a few oasis) could support at the time of Mohammed is estimated to have been less than 2 million people, men, women and children. The Muslim "invaders" were overwhelmingly local converts to Islam.
 
The population that the Arabian peninsula (a desert with a few oasis) could support at the time of Mohammed is estimated to have been less than 2 million people, men, women and children. The Muslim "invaders" were overwhelmingly local converts to Islam.

by the same method people were converted to Christianity by Roman invaders.
You got some other news Monte?
 
by the same method people were converted to Christianity by Roman invaders.

Someone's forgotten the work done by Christian, Jewish and Muslim missionaries...

someone is intent on rewriting history------actually LOTS OF PEOPLE

If you knew anything about history you'd know that every generation writes it's own "history" and succeeding generations review and re-write it as more information becomes available and new facts are uncovered. The trick is to not get stuck with one version of "history"; as Napoleon once famously said, "history is a set of lies, agreed upon."
 
Isis is doing missionary "work" amongst the Kurdish Zoroastrians ----just as Nigerian muslims -----of the boko haram flavor are doing "missionary work" amongst
Christian nigerians
 
by the same method people were converted to Christianity by Roman invaders.

Someone's forgotten the work done by Christian, Jewish and Muslim missionaries...

someone is intent on rewriting history------actually LOTS OF PEOPLE

If you knew anything about history you'd know that every generation writes it's own "history" and succeeding generations review and re-write it as more information becomes available and new facts are uncovered. The trick is to not get stuck with one version of "history"; as Napoleon once famously said, "history is a set of lies, agreed upon."

you are referring to people of your ilk-------the unwashed and the
illiterate-------Literate people actually have RECORDED HISTORY.
India has a real history, China has a real history and Jews have a
real history-------the romans have a history too-----sorta
 
by the same method people were converted to Christianity by Roman invaders.

Someone's forgotten the work done by Christian, Jewish and Muslim missionaries...

someone is intent on rewriting history------actually LOTS OF PEOPLE

If you knew anything about history you'd know that every generation writes it's own "history" and succeeding generations review and re-write it as more information becomes available and new facts are uncovered. The trick is to not get stuck with one version of "history"; as Napoleon once famously said, "history is a set of lies, agreed upon."

you are referring to people of your ilk-------the unwashed and the
illiterate-------Literate people actually have RECORDED HISTORY.
India has a real history, China has a real history and Jews have a
real history-------the romans have a history too-----sorta

Oh dear, another sufferer of mad cow disease.
*sigh* Of course everyone has a "recorded history" which is "real" for a generation or two, then people come along and examine records or find previously undiscovered records in forgotten or "lost" archives dug up by archaeologists and then "recorded history" has to be reviewed, revised and then amended to deal with new information. Case in point to illustrate the situation. Most people are aware of the Spanish Armada incident in 1588; after 400 years or so, you'd think there's not much we dont know about it by now, yet there are literally thousands of records held in the Escorial which no-one has looked at in all that time. It only takes a researcher to find a significant document or two, and we'd have to rewrite that whole chapter of history. "History" is re-written all the time, by everyone, unwashed or not.
 
MUSLIMS ARE LEAVING ISLAM IN DROVES AND "BEGGING CHRIST FOR HEALING"
Leah Marieann Klett : Nov 11, 2016

Muslims Are Leaving Islam in Droves and "Begging Christ for Healing"

Muslim Refugees In Europe Are Standing In Line To Say NO To Islam And Are Converting To Christianity And Getting Baptized By The Droves
by Walid Shoebat on June 7, 2016 in Featured, General

Muslim Refugees In Europe Are Standing In Line To Say NO To Islam And Are Converting To Christianity And Getting Baptized By The Droves
 
If things like Challenger have their way, in a hundred years from now, all European history books will be teaching that Europe has been Islamic forever, and has never been anything else.
 
With all the conversions to Christianity, Islam will appear to be a blip in an otherwise Christian era.
 
by the same method people were converted to Christianity by Roman invaders.

Someone's forgotten the work done by Christian, Jewish and Muslim missionaries...

someone is intent on rewriting history------actually LOTS OF PEOPLE

If you knew anything about history you'd know that every generation writes it's own "history" and succeeding generations review and re-write it as more information becomes available and new facts are uncovered. The trick is to not get stuck with one version of "history"; as Napoleon once famously said, "history is a set of lies, agreed upon."

you are referring to people of your ilk-------the unwashed and the
illiterate-------Literate people actually have RECORDED HISTORY.
India has a real history, China has a real history and Jews have a
real history-------the romans have a history too-----sorta

Oh dear, another sufferer of mad cow disease.
*sigh* Of course everyone has a "recorded history" which is "real" for a generation or two, then people come along and examine records or find previously undiscovered records in forgotten or "lost" archives dug up by archaeologists and then "recorded history" has to be reviewed, revised and then amended to deal with new information. Case in point to illustrate the situation. Most people are aware of the Spanish Armada incident in 1588; after 400 years or so, you'd think there's not much we dont know about it by now, yet there are literally thousands of records held in the Escorial which no-one has looked at in all that time. It only takes a researcher to find a significant document or two, and we'd have to rewrite that whole chapter of history. "History" is re-written all the time, by everyone, unwashed or not.

you made no POINT------O' ye of no history. ------some lost details and newly found documents? You are TRIVIAL
 

Forum List

Back
Top