'ISIS controlled terrirtory'

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,043
280
Earth
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.


calm yourself------lots of humans are still there------mommys and babies
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.


calm yourself------lots of humans are still there------mommys and babies

Are mommy terrorists making babies for the next generation of terrorists. Any innocent mommies have long since fled.

To win a war you have to accept some innocent non-comatants are gonna be killed. But of you try and make war sterile with just combatants being killed they'll go on forever and overall be a lot worse. Won WWII in under 4 years in multiple countries around the world accepting the reality of this. Lost Afganistan in 15 years trying the sterile approach.

Time to resume fighting like we did in WWII.
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.


calm yourself------lots of humans are still there------mommys and babies

Are mommy terrorists making babies for the next generation of terrorists. Any innocent mommies have long since fled.

To win a war you have to accept some innocent non-comatants are gonna be killed. But of you try and make war sterile with just combatants being killed they'll go on forever and overall be a lot worse. Won WWII in under 4 years in multiple countries around the world accepting the reality of this. Lost Afganistan in 15 years trying the sterile approach.

Time to resume fighting like we did in WWII.

we did CARPET BOMBING only rarely in world war II-------Berlin comes to mind-------strategic bombing is war-------not carpet bombing
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.


calm yourself------lots of humans are still there------mommys and babies

Are mommy terrorists making babies for the next generation of terrorists. Any innocent mommies have long since fled.

To win a war you have to accept some innocent non-comatants are gonna be killed. But of you try and make war sterile with just combatants being killed they'll go on forever and overall be a lot worse. Won WWII in under 4 years in multiple countries around the world accepting the reality of this. Lost Afganistan in 15 years trying the sterile approach.

Time to resume fighting like we did in WWII.
It's a race war, but they can't admit it so we lose it instead.
 
The one and only problem was the Obama switched side. ISIS and AQ were contained and on the defensive, Obama put them in charge of Libya, Iraq and much of Syria

"In January 2007, Ramadi averaged approximately 35 enemy attacks on US forces per day. Following heavy fighting over an 8-week campaign, which was led by a Task Force commanded by 1st Brigade, 3rd ID, also known as Task Force Raider, attacks in the brigade's area of operations dropped to one or two per day within the city of Ramadi. In the early months of 2007, 3-69 Armor Battalion, in conjunction with two Marine Battalions, along with TF PathFinder was largely responsible for securing Southern and Central Ramadi. By August 2007, Ramadi had gone 80 consecutive days without a single attack on US forces and the 1st BDE, 3rd ID commander commander, Colonel John Charlton, stated, "...al-Qaida is defeated in Al Anbar". However, despite 1-3 ID's effectiveness, insurgents continued to launch attacks on Ramadi and the surrounding areas in the weeks and months to follow. On June 30, 2007, a group of between 50 and 60 insurgents attempting to infiltrate Ramadi were intercepted and destroyed, following a tip from Iraqi Police officers. The insurgents were intercepted by elements of the 1st Battalion, 77th Armor on 30 June 2007 and on 1 July 2007 they were destroyed by elements of Bravo company, 2nd Squad, 1st platoon, 1-18 Infantry Regiment. 1-18 operated out of the Ta'Meem district of Ramadi's western sector. North of Ramadi, elements of 3-69 Armor, whose headquarters had been moved north of Ramadi, engaged elements of al-Qaeda in Iraq who had taken refuge in rural areas north of the city. After several counter-insurgency operations, 3-69 AR Battalion effectively removed Al Qaeda in Iraq from the greater Anbar province. By March 2008, Ramadi, Iraq had become a vastly safer city than it had been only a year before and the number of enemy attacks in the city had fallen drastically. Years later, by mid 2012, Ramadi remained far safer than it had been since 2003

1024px-Defense.gov_News_Photo_060425-M-9529D-011.jpg



Battle of Ramadi (2006) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.


calm yourself------lots of humans are still there------mommys and babies

Are mommy terrorists making babies for the next generation of terrorists. Any innocent mommies have long since fled.

To win a war you have to accept some innocent non-comatants are gonna be killed. But of you try and make war sterile with just combatants being killed they'll go on forever and overall be a lot worse. Won WWII in under 4 years in multiple countries around the world accepting the reality of this. Lost Afganistan in 15 years trying the sterile approach.

Time to resume fighting like we did in WWII.

we did CARPET BOMBING only rarely in world war II-------Berlin comes to mind-------strategic bombing is war-------not carpet bombing

War involves destroying your enemy physicallybut also your enemy's willingness to fight. That means cities and population centers. This experiment with sanitizing warfare to make it acceptable has run its course and it's time to resume what works.

We used in the words of General Curtis LeMay 'terror bombing' in WW2. We carpet bombed, used incendiaries against civlian poulation centers and as a result we destoryed both the physical enemy but more importantly the civilian populations support to go on fighting.

War is never ideal nor is it ever going to be sanitary and inoffensive. But if war comes to you and you try to half-ass your way through it you're only ensuring it goes on longer than it needs to.If not for the radiation, nuclear weapons should be used.
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'

Oddly enough though most know about Dresden, it wasn't actually the worst example of incendiaries and carpet bombing from WW2.
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'

Oddly enough though most know about Dresden, it wasn't actually the worst example of incendiaries and carpet bombing from WW2.
If Tokyo´s official death toll of 100.000 is also just 5 % of the real death toll, you might be right.
 
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'

Oddly enough though most know about Dresden, it wasn't actually the worst example of incendiaries and carpet bombing from WW2.
If Tokyo´s official death toll of 100.000 is also just 5 % of the real death toll, you might be right.


3. Dresden (October 1944-April 1945) – 25,000 killed
2. Hamburg (September 1939-April 1945) – 42,600 killed
1. Tokyo (November 1944-August 1945) – 100,000-plus killed

10 Most Devastating Bombing Campaigns of WWII
 
Last edited:
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'

Oddly enough though most know about Dresden, it wasn't actually the worst example of incendiaries and carpet bombing from WW2.
If Tokyo´s official death toll of 100.000 is also just 5 % of the real death toll, you might be right.


3. Dresden (October 1944-April 1945) – 25,000 killed
2. Hamburg (September 1939-April 1945) – 42,600 killed
1. Tokyo (November 1944-August 1945) – 100,000-plus killed

10 Most Devastating Bombing Campaigns of WWII
If the German police found over 200.000 dead bodies after the Dresden bombing, I would say, at least 200.00 have died. Further hundreds of thousands may have completely been reduced to ashes.
 
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'

Oddly enough though most know about Dresden, it wasn't actually the worst example of incendiaries and carpet bombing from WW2.
If Tokyo´s official death toll of 100.000 is also just 5 % of the real death toll, you might be right.


3. Dresden (October 1944-April 1945) – 25,000 killed
2. Hamburg (September 1939-April 1945) – 42,600 killed
1. Tokyo (November 1944-August 1945) – 100,000-plus killed

10 Most Devastating Bombing Campaigns of WWII

thanks Delta------did they cause increased love of Adolf?
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
Why not, we did it to Germany?
Terrorbombing the German population had no effect but an increase of the popularity of the regime.

to what terror bombing do you refer capt blei-----that made your 'god' adolf
MORE POPULAR?
Why are you such a fucking hypocrite? Why do you call adolf my god?

300px-Lancaster_I_NG128_Dropping_Load_-_Duisburg_-_Oct_14_-_1944_new.jpg


Blockbuster bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bomter.jpg


The WWII Dresden Holocaust - 'A Single Column Of Flame'

Oddly enough though most know about Dresden, it wasn't actually the worst example of incendiaries and carpet bombing from WW2.

Even I knew about Dresden-----place but not when
 
The one and only problem was the Obama switched side. ISIS and AQ were contained and on the defensive, Obama put them in charge of Libya, Iraq and much of Syria

No - The big problem is the idiot CIA armed and trained both.
 
Hasn't the big problem with conventional militaries doing well against terrorists always been they don't have countries and cities to bomb? Yet I keep seeing on the news these maps of the middle east where huge swaths of land designated as ISIS-controlled. So can't we send bombers there and wipe them out pretty much at will? All the non-combatants have fled yes? Just bad guys now. Wanna be pc, tell the inhabitants bombers are coming in xx hours to drop a 250 pound bomb onto every private home's roof, and 2000 pound JDAMs through the roof of every commercial building. If not a terrorist we strongly encourage you to leave. If a terrorist, stay right where you are. Then follow through. That's really important.

Next town, repeat. Either terrorists will eventually surrender en masse' like the Iraqi conscript forces or they'll flee. If neither, repeat until they do.

Dunno why we're talking about combat troops before a massive air bombing campaign.
No.

ISIS fighters are living among innocent citizens; to bomb ISIS is to bomb those civilians. And there's nowhere for these civilians to go, even if they tried to relocate somewhere ISIS fighters would go along with them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top