ISIS attacks on Hamas in the Gaza strip

P F Tinmore, et al,

This may be what you want to believe, but is less likely to be true.

(COMMENT)

Israel did leave Gaza in 2005. It gave the Hostile Arab Palestinians an opportunity to alter the face of Gaza. The Palestinians declined the opportunity and opted to create a battle zone.

(COMMENT)

The Palestinians had an opportunity to create "a great place on the Mediterranean." Israel did NOT immediately create the containment program in 2005. During the period 2005 until the Block was raised in 2009, ---- HAMAS launched over 7000 rockets and mortars into Israel.


Rather than "create a great place on the Mediterranean," the Palestinians chose another option (Rocket and Mortars).

(COMMENT)

I don't make that leap. The more viable interpretation is that neither HAMAS or DAESH have the makings of a "better partner." Neither have demonstrated that they can build a society of any value to humanity of the regional community.

The valued outcome here is that one or the other --- eliminates the other --- as a threat to regional peace and security; and in the process weakens the surviving opponent. Then, without regards to which survives (HAMAS or DAESH) there is just but one with which remains to be contained and dealt with.

(COMMENT)

I don't know what the Palestinian calls a "lie" --- let alone a "truth." So I have no real idea --- over the course of time (now and into the future) what Palestinian objectives and goals will evolve. It is very difficult to determine what such a Sharia Law State would make under an undefined leadership.

What we can see is the economic growth.

33170-a0b7998b2ba515cec1852e943a676330.jpg
PALESTINE compared to ISRAEL
33171-31b60433519deddfe6f34cf9029389d7.jpg

Most Respectfully,
R
In all due respect, Rocco, you are full of shit.








Only because he posts the truth backed up with unbiased links that destroys your islamonazi propaganda.

What did he post that refutes my post?


it's every post.



you're a terrorist supporter. how are your people going to live in peace with terrorists in charge ?


shut up pinkmore..."refute" it somewhere else....

!terrorist supporter!

The terrorist card is no longer the ace of trump.




yes it is.
 
Global Research = Global Compost! :lmao:

Bacheh kooney zer zad dobareh.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

Lekh tezdayen
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles
 
In all due respect, Rocco, you are full of shit.








Only because he posts the truth backed up with unbiased links that destroys your islamonazi propaganda.

What did he post that refutes my post?


it's every post.



you're a terrorist supporter. how are your people going to live in peace with terrorists in charge ?


shut up pinkmore..."refute" it somewhere else....

!terrorist supporter!

The terrorist card is no longer the ace of trump.


But Hamas is a terrorist organization. There's a reason so many countries have them listed as such. Just because you support them, it doesn't change anything.


And now, even many Arab countries like Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and many Gulf States have Hamas listed as terrorist. :clap2:
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

This may be what you want to believe, but is less likely to be true.

(COMMENT)

Israel did leave Gaza in 2005. It gave the Hostile Arab Palestinians an opportunity to alter the face of Gaza. The Palestinians declined the opportunity and opted to create a battle zone.

(COMMENT)

The Palestinians had an opportunity to create "a great place on the Mediterranean." Israel did NOT immediately create the containment program in 2005. During the period 2005 until the Block was raised in 2009, ---- HAMAS launched over 7000 rockets and mortars into Israel.


Rather than "create a great place on the Mediterranean," the Palestinians chose another option (Rocket and Mortars).

(COMMENT)

I don't make that leap. The more viable interpretation is that neither HAMAS or DAESH have the makings of a "better partner." Neither have demonstrated that they can build a society of any value to humanity of the regional community.

The valued outcome here is that one or the other --- eliminates the other --- as a threat to regional peace and security; and in the process weakens the surviving opponent. Then, without regards to which survives (HAMAS or DAESH) there is just but one with which remains to be contained and dealt with.

(COMMENT)

I don't know what the Palestinian calls a "lie" --- let alone a "truth." So I have no real idea --- over the course of time (now and into the future) what Palestinian objectives and goals will evolve. It is very difficult to determine what such a Sharia Law State would make under an undefined leadership.

What we can see is the economic growth.

33170-a0b7998b2ba515cec1852e943a676330.jpg
PALESTINE compared to ISRAEL
33171-31b60433519deddfe6f34cf9029389d7.jpg

Most Respectfully,
R
In all due respect, Rocco, you are full of shit.








Only because he posts the truth backed up with unbiased links that destroys your islamonazi propaganda.

What did he post that refutes my post?


it's every post.



you're a terrorist supporter. how are your people going to live in peace with terrorists in charge ?


shut up pinkmore..."refute" it somewhere else....

!terrorist supporter!

The terrorist card is no longer the ace of trump.


Actually, it's time to call a spade a spade and Hamas what it is, terrorist.
 
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

GR is one of the top 1000 alternative media outlets in the world. It is non-partisan and non-affiliated with any political group or corporate organization.

I challenge anyone to prove one of their articles wrong.
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

This may be what you want to believe, but is less likely to be true.

(COMMENT)

Israel did leave Gaza in 2005. It gave the Hostile Arab Palestinians an opportunity to alter the face of Gaza. The Palestinians declined the opportunity and opted to create a battle zone.

(COMMENT)

The Palestinians had an opportunity to create "a great place on the Mediterranean." Israel did NOT immediately create the containment program in 2005. During the period 2005 until the Block was raised in 2009, ---- HAMAS launched over 7000 rockets and mortars into Israel.


Rather than "create a great place on the Mediterranean," the Palestinians chose another option (Rocket and Mortars).

(COMMENT)

I don't make that leap. The more viable interpretation is that neither HAMAS or DAESH have the makings of a "better partner." Neither have demonstrated that they can build a society of any value to humanity of the regional community.

The valued outcome here is that one or the other --- eliminates the other --- as a threat to regional peace and security; and in the process weakens the surviving opponent. Then, without regards to which survives (HAMAS or DAESH) there is just but one with which remains to be contained and dealt with.

(COMMENT)

I don't know what the Palestinian calls a "lie" --- let alone a "truth." So I have no real idea --- over the course of time (now and into the future) what Palestinian objectives and goals will evolve. It is very difficult to determine what such a Sharia Law State would make under an undefined leadership.

What we can see is the economic growth.

33170-a0b7998b2ba515cec1852e943a676330.jpg
PALESTINE compared to ISRAEL
33171-31b60433519deddfe6f34cf9029389d7.jpg

Most Respectfully,
R
In all due respect, Rocco, you are full of shit.








Only because he posts the truth backed up with unbiased links that destroys your islamonazi propaganda.

What did he post that refutes my post?


it's every post.



you're a terrorist supporter. how are your people going to live in peace with terrorists in charge ?


shut up pinkmore..."refute" it somewhere else....

!terrorist supporter!

The terrorist card is no longer the ace of trump.






Why ? because it shows your preferred heroes as the barbarians they are
 
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

GR is one of the top 1000 alternative media outlets in the world. It is non-partisan and non-affiliated with any political group or corporate organization.

I challenge anyone to prove one of their articles wrong.




Will this do

Globalresearch.ca - RationalWiki


Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11,[5] vaccines,[6] genetic modification,[7] Zionism,[8][9] HAARP,[10] global warming,[11][12] Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails,[14] and David Kelly.[15]

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi,[16] reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general
 
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

GR is one of the top 1000 alternative media outlets in the world. It is non-partisan and non-affiliated with any political group or corporate organization.

I challenge anyone to prove one of their articles wrong.

Jaysus you're even dumber than we thought. So you think, as Global Composte portrays, that North Korea is a land of human achievement, love and joy? :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

North Korea a Land of Human Achievement Love and Joy Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
 
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

GR is one of the top 1000 alternative media outlets in the world. It is non-partisan and non-affiliated with any political group or corporate organization.

I challenge anyone to prove one of their articles wrong.




Will this do

Globalresearch.ca - RationalWiki


Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11,[5] vaccines,[6] genetic modification,[7] Zionism,[8][9] HAARP,[10] global warming,[11][12] Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails,[14] and David Kelly.[15]

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi,[16] reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general

It's no surprise that bigmouth is attracted to garbage like Global Compost.
 
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

GR is one of the top 1000 alternative media outlets in the world. It is non-partisan and non-affiliated with any political group or corporate organization.

I challenge anyone to prove one of their articles wrong.

Jaysus you're even dumber than we thought. So you think, as Global Composte portrays, that North Korea is a land of human achievement, love and joy? :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

North Korea a Land of Human Achievement Love and Joy Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

They need to add another button category: Agree, informative, thank you,& (for billo, etc, zipmore, et al) - i don't think so...
 
Global Research = Global Compost! :lmao:

Bacheh kooney zer zad dobareh.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.

Lekh tezdayen
No...Global Research = Global Compost, which is what you consume.

What it really is
Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Global Research mostly consists of polemicists, many of whom accept (and use) conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order.[4] Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11. vaccines, genetic modification, Zionism, HAARP, global warming, Bosnian genocide denialism[13] chemtrails, and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyan civil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard "anti-globalisation" stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

Globalresearch also has published numerous articles written by contributors to New Eastern Outlook, a Moscow-based Russian Government propaganda site. It has published the same articles on the same day as Oriental Review, a Moscow-based site that is also almost certainly a Russian Government site.

It's no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Truly remarkable articles

"whacko elements."


- Russian/Ukraine Government
- Moscow/Ukraine


- North Korea






 
"I challenge anyone to prove one of their articles wrong..."

sam_zpsd46783bd.jpg


Dickweed
1) A completely self-absorbed, useless asshole with shit for brains;

2) A person so irredeemably stupid that their idiotic behavior causes pain to everyone that they interact with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top