Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So let us continue.Always, regardless of who does it or whose orders they claim to be following?wrong is wrong.
cetaris paribus, yes.
I disagree. I'd say whether one 'gets caught' is of less matter, ultimately, than whether one emerges victorious or defeated.History proves that there is no such thing as "right & wrong" - only getting caught or not.
Always, regardless of who does it or whose orders they claim to be following?wrong is wrong.
cetaris paribus, yes.
I disagree. I'd say whether one 'gets caught' is of less matter, ultimately, than whether one emerges victorious or defeated.History proves that there is no such thing as "right & wrong" - only getting caught or not.
Had Hitler one, he'd be hailed as a hero for purifying the population, much as American settlers are hailed as heroes who conquered the land- the actions against the natives generally whitewashed and mentioned only in passing.
Likewise, the Jews won and hence their actions against the Moabites, Jesubites, Hittites, and others are rarely if ever questioned.
Had the redcoats won, Washington would be known as a traitor and murderer.
And hence would not be able to learn from his mistakes.If man would quit reflecting on what happened we'd never have to bother with it.
Doublespeak. It is wrong OR right, there is no wrongright. That is not possible.Or can the same act be wrong when one person does it and righteous when another does the same thing?
Wrong is ALWAYS wrong, but sometimes it is right to be wrong.
Killing is wrong, but killing Bin Laden was a wrong that was right to commit.
I disagree. I'd say whether one 'gets caught' is of less matter, ultimately, than whether one emerges victorious or defeated.History proves that there is no such thing as "right & wrong" - only getting caught or not.
Had Hitler one, he'd be hailed as a hero for purifying the population, much as American settlers are hailed as heroes who conquered the land- the actions against the natives generally whitewashed and mentioned only in passing.
Likewise, the Jews won and hence their actions against the Moabites, Jesubites, Hittites, and others are rarely if ever questioned.
Had the redcoats won, Washington would be known as a traitor and murderer.
Or can the same act be wrong when one person does it and righteous when another does the same thing?
Wrong is ALWAYS wrong, but sometimes it is right to be wrong.
Killing is wrong, but killing Bin Laden was a wrong that was right to commit.
Right and wrong are decided by the victorious.
And hence would not be able to learn from his mistakes.If man would quit reflecting on what happened we'd never have to bother with it.
Right and wrong are determined wholly out of the society that you are in, the circumstances that surround you and those that write the histories after the fact. Black and whit morality may7 seem like truth but the fact of the matter is that he world is rarely black and white and there are always circumstances.
Doublespeak. It is wrong OR right, there is no wrongright. That is not possible.Or can the same act be wrong when one person does it and righteous when another does the same thing?
Wrong is ALWAYS wrong, but sometimes it is right to be wrong.
Killing is wrong, but killing Bin Laden was a wrong that was right to commit.
Or can the same act be wrong when one person does it and righteous when another does the same thing?
Wrong is ALWAYS wrong, but sometimes it is right to be wrong.
Killing is wrong, but killing Bin Laden was a wrong that was right to commit.