Is this the unintended consequence of Trump's CNN bashing?

Weird thing is, CNN has not changed their format...as in "Trump, Trump, Trump...Russia, Russia, Russia"
Is MSNBC not doing 24 hour anti-Trump stories like CNN?
 

The core demographic for Faux News are 69 years old. Once their liar in chief Bile O'riley was outed as a pervert the old people went back to listeing to Paul Harvey reruns online. Rachel Maddow is very clear and truthful and lays out a story like no one else. CNN is still doing fine. The cable news networks in general have about 1/4 the daily viewership of each of the broadcast networks like CBS and NBC.

Poor Faux News, now that they've been outed as a den of perverts and their continuing output of fake news has sunk them.
 
Weird thing is, CNN has not changed their format...as in "Trump, Trump, Trump...Russia, Russia, Russia"
Is MSNBC not doing 24 hour anti-Trump stories like CNN?
Yeah, sure, but no one ever watches MSNBC except that crazy guy who shot the Republican congressmen.. Of course, he's dead now.

Since the OP clearly shows MSNBC's ratings, what are you talking about?
 
Weird thing is, CNN has not changed their format...as in "Trump, Trump, Trump...Russia, Russia, Russia"
Is MSNBC not doing 24 hour anti-Trump stories like CNN?
Yeah, sure, but no one ever watches MSNBC except that crazy guy who shot the Republican congressmen.. Of course, he's dead now.

Since the OP clearly shows MSNBC's ratings, what are you talking about?
Look, you're not a "math kinda guy", but when you go from one viewer to two that's a 100% increase. Find a white person to explain it to you.
 

The core demographic for Faux News are 69 years old. Once their liar in chief Bile O'riley was outed as a pervert the old people went back to listeing to Paul Harvey reruns online. Rachel Maddow is very clear and truthful and lays out a story like no one else. CNN is still doing fine. The cable news networks in general have about 1/4 the daily viewership of each of the broadcast networks like CBS and NBC.

Poor Faux News, now that they've been outed as a den of perverts and their continuing output of fake news has sunk them.

Wow! Put that into Websters Dictionary as an example to support the definition of "Spin".
 
CNN, a pioneer in cable broadcasting, has become the laughing stock of American media.

faux is the lying stock of America
Fox has been stellar from the debates to the elections to Chris Wallace. CNN has hit rock bottom between Stetler and Cuomo and are getting their asses handed to them and are being humiliated on an almost daily basis, much like the Democrat party they shill for.

You're just spewing regurgitated shit and you know it.
 
... Rachel Maddow is very clear and truthful and lays out a story like no one else....

You mean like Trumps tax returns? :lmao:
Only person who would attribute Maddow as "clear and truthful" is one of her followers, in the EXACT same way Limbaugh fans do. No different.
She is queen of the "half-covered"...she lies by omission.
Same as Sean Hannity on Fox, he may tell 100% of the truth on a typical show, but it is a "truth" on one side of the story. Omitting half of it.
 
... Rachel Maddow is very clear and truthful and lays out a story like no one else....

You mean like Trumps tax returns? :lmao:
Only person who would attribute Maddow as "clear and truthful" is one of her followers, in the EXACT same way Limbaugh fans do. No different.
She is queen of the "half-covered"...she lies by omission.
Same as Sean Hannity on Fox, he may tell 100% of the truth on a typical show, but it is a "truth" on one side of the story. Omitting half of it.

Your one who finds one aberration and believes you've discovered plutonium. When you've moved on from simplistic linear thinking come back for another go. Newspapers make a typo or factual mistake and they print a correction. But the con bubble has glommed on to this fake idea that 'all you have to do is find one instance of something not being perfect and it is forever discredited".

The world doesn't work that way. Sorry. Telling that you use an emoticon, emotion runs you.
 
Last edited:
... Rachel Maddow is very clear and truthful and lays out a story like no one else....

You mean like Trumps tax returns? :lmao:
Only person who would attribute Maddow as "clear and truthful" is one of her followers, in the EXACT same way Limbaugh fans do. No different.
She is queen of the "half-covered"...she lies by omission.
Same as Sean Hannity on Fox, he may tell 100% of the truth on a typical show, but it is a "truth" on one side of the story. Omitting half of it.

Your one who finds one aberration and believes you've discovered plutonium. When you've moved on from simplistic linear thinking come back for another go. Newspapers make a typo or factual mistake and they print a correction. But the con bubble has glommed on to this fake idea that 'all you have to do is find one instance of something not being perfect and it is forever discredited".

The world doesn't work that way. Sorry. Telling that you use an emoticon, emotion runs you.

lol....your deep. :D
Madcow has 1,000 instances of hyperbole and exaggeration. Anyone who calls Limbaugh a fake and hails Maddow is obviously biased.
:D
 
... Rachel Maddow is very clear and truthful and lays out a story like no one else....

You mean like Trumps tax returns? :lmao:
Only person who would attribute Maddow as "clear and truthful" is one of her followers, in the EXACT same way Limbaugh fans do. No different.
She is queen of the "half-covered"...she lies by omission.
Same as Sean Hannity on Fox, he may tell 100% of the truth on a typical show, but it is a "truth" on one side of the story. Omitting half of it.

Your one who finds one aberration and believes you've discovered plutonium. When you've moved on from simplistic linear thinking come back for another go. Newspapers make a typo or factual mistake and they print a correction. But the con bubble has glommed on to this fake idea that 'all you have to do is find one instance of something not being perfect and it is forever discredited".

The world doesn't work that way. Sorry. Telling that you use an emoticon, emotion runs you.

lol....your deep. :D
Madcow has 1,000 instances of hyperbole and exaggeration. Anyone who calls Limbaugh a fake and hails Maddow is obviously biased.
:D


Limbaugh needs to lay off the drugs. O'reilly needs to go find a retirement home and stop pretending any woman thinks he is attractive. Like Trump. Two of the ugliest old men you will find. O'reilly can't get a woman and Trump has to buy them.
 
Limbaugh needs to lay off the drugs. O'reilly needs to go find a retirement home and stop pretending any woman thinks he is attractive. Like Trump. Two of the ugliest old men you will find. O'reilly can't get a woman and Trump has to buy them.


Limbaugh and O'reilly are media whores. I I cannot imagine listening to Rush's fat ass mouth for 2 minutes. Listening to his show would make someone dumber for having listened to it.
Maddow is also media whore. She sensationalizes issues, rags on about non issues, and again tells half-truths. She is no more objective than Sean Hannity on Fox...they are two of the same. I have watched them both.
As a note...I have a brother that lives in Chicago, he called me a couple days ago and talked about all of the flooding - I said "what flooding?"...he couldn't believe I didn't know about it. I said I haven't seen anything on the news about it. If Trump wasn't involved, then it doesn't make the news.
 

Forum List

Back
Top