When everyone knows that regiment was composed of those with Norwegian heritage.They looked to much like negroes with negro features.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When everyone knows that regiment was composed of those with Norwegian heritage.They looked to much like negroes with negro features.
Like the mounted officers of the 50th Pennsylvania Infantry lording it over the white trash?Thinking like an SJW I could probably point to the fact the white guy is on horseback, lording over the black soldiers.
I'm shocked. Shocked.
But I imagine you're thinking more like a guy completely ignorant of military history.
Yep, I was rightOK, you are implying your question is a puzzle. So, having said you would divulge the answer after a few posts, it is time for you to give the answer.You just want to put your own warped spin on history. In order for black troops to serve they needed a qualified experienced leader. The only officers that fit the requirements were white. Unless you can show where a black man qualified to lead black troops was available you are just talking our of your ass.ignore the actual history and just look at the sculpture.
Truth be told this is to me an exercise in thinking like the other side does.
What spin?
I know exactly who is in the sculpture, and the history of the regiment.
Again, just looking at it, can you see anything problematic with it?
Thinking like an SJW I could probably point to the fact the white guy is on horseback, lording over the black soldiers.
Also the black soldiers are a bit too obviously "black" as shown.
Just wondering, with all the nuttery over removing Statues if people can find something wrong with this one.
If you don't know what it is, I'll tell ya in a few posts.
Not at all. It's a representation of American history.
Just wondering, with all the nuttery over removing Statues if people can find something wrong with this one.
If you don't know what it is, I'll tell ya in a few posts.
Not at all. It's a representation of American history.
I agree.
The lefties aren't getting the concept behind my question.
Just wondering, with all the nuttery over removing Statues if people can find something wrong with this one.
If you don't know what it is, I'll tell ya in a few posts.
Not at all. It's a representation of American history.
I agree.
The lefties aren't getting the concept behind my question.
It came from a series I think in the 1980's or 1990's, where monkies were performing scenes from old movies.Just wondering, with all the nuttery over removing Statues if people can find something wrong with this one.
If you don't know what it is, I'll tell ya in a few posts.
Not at all. It's a representation of American history.
I agree.
The lefties aren't getting the concept behind my question.
that's a good gif, gonna have to steal it.
It came from a series I think in the 1980's or 1990's, where monkies were performing scenes from old movies.Just wondering, with all the nuttery over removing Statues if people can find something wrong with this one.
If you don't know what it is, I'll tell ya in a few posts.
Not at all. It's a representation of American history.
I agree.
The lefties aren't getting the concept behind my question.
that's a good gif, gonna have to steal it.
What, you thought a statue showing the equal treatment of blacks by officers was problematic? I can imagine that.Again, this was a thought exercise to me, nothing more.