CDZ Is this image a problem for you? Does it disturb you?

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by 2aguy, Jul 23, 2017.

  1. Picaro
    Offline

    Picaro Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,372
    Thanks Received:
    1,056
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +4,940
    Well, the racist Democrats only want to disarm legal citizens, making violent thugs and criminal illegal aliens the only people they hope to exempt from criminal arrests and prosecution, and they dream their dogs will then start murdering a lot of white people, especially those Evul Xians and white proles. At least that's what their degenerate violent politics point to. They've already 'mainstreamed' assassinating police officers and glorifying hood rat vermin as 'martyrs' among their base, so now they need to move on to the next goal. It's yet another one of their 'social justice' platforms that align perfectly with the political goals of the billionaire 'globalist' labor racketeers and swindlers they suck up to.

    Just read the Foreign Affairs quarterly for their flagship propaganda outlet; it's not like they're concerned about keeping their criminal operations secret or anything. They now hope to make Red China the new military power for forcing 'compliance' among the other nations as a fall back if they fail in the U.S.
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2017
  2. miketx
    Offline

    miketx Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    28,184
    Thanks Received:
    2,838
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +31,306
    It most certainly is.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    23,734
    Thanks Received:
    628
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +2,882
    I only take women seriously if they can wear miniskirts and miniguns, at the same time.
     
  4. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    23,734
    Thanks Received:
    628
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +2,882
    Well armed women can Always ignore the dogs.
     
  5. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    23,734
    Thanks Received:
    628
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +2,882
    Nope; no problem with nice quiet girls in the "house next door".

    These women may "intimidate me" if they should ever receive orders to "leave no guy behind".

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. dblack
    Online

    dblack Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,383
    Thanks Received:
    2,173
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +4,643
    I'm sure they feel likewise about you.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  7. Divine.Wind
    Offline

    Divine.Wind Platinum Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,473
    Thanks Received:
    5,438
    Trophy Points:
    420
    Ratings:
    +14,564
    It certainly can be in several instances. The fact you claim to not understand this, given you actually are capable of doing so, just means you can't be trusted to discuss this honestly. Another reason Constitutional Amendment supporters do not trust Left Wingers to be honest.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    53,177
    Thanks Received:
    9,181
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +35,960

    And nothing in your post is accurate....as more people own and carry guns our gun crime rate went down...showing you don't know what you are talking about. As more Americans own and carry guns, our gun accident rate and our accidental gun death rate went down, not up...showing you don't know what you are talking about.

    As to children....those of us who support the Right to self defense believe that gun safety should be taught in schools, to help lower the incidents of gun accidents and kids.....and people like you stop those programs whenever you can....

    So....we want children to be safe around guns, you want to stop those safety programs....of the two of us, you are endangering more children, not me....
     
  9. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    53,177
    Thanks Received:
    9,181
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +35,960

    No....I will give you current, federally mandated background checks at gun stores. They don't work....but you anti gunners seem to like them...that is me meeting you half way.

    I say no to Universal Background checks for private sales of guns...for a number of reasons, first...because anti gun leadership simply wants them in order to have leverage to get universal gun registration....you can't have background checks for private sales without gun registration, you won't know who started with the gun in order to punish people who sell their guns without the background check...so, no universal background checks.

    Also...according to the Haynes v. United States Supreme Court decision, criminals do not have to register their illegal guns...do you understand that point? Yes or No? That means that only normal, law abiding citizens who want guns for self defense, not crime, are the only ones who will be punished for not registering their guns.....does that make any sense to you?

    Then you have another problem with UBCs.....they don't work any better than current federally mandated background checks for gun store purchases....the same people who are straw buyers, those who can pass a background check and buy guns for criminals....usually family members and boyfriend gang members....can also pass background checks for private sales.....making them just as useless at stopping actual criminals.

    Then you have another problem....mass public shooters can pass all background checks...since they usually haven't committed a crime that would keep them from buying guns...and of those who have, they can simply steal the guns they want, since most public shooters plan their crimes 6 months to 2 years in advance of the attack.

    Then you have the simple fact.....guns are private property, and the government can't be allowed to regulate the private sale of personal property......

    Then, the capper.........we already have all the laws we need to put criminals in jail....if a felon is caught owning, buying or carrying a gun, they can already be arrested and locked up. If you commit a crime with a gun, rape, robbery or murder, you can be arrested and locked up.

    Background checks do nothing to help lock up those criminals. If you want current background checks...you can have them...but no more...we met you half way...not one step more.....
     
  10. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    53,177
    Thanks Received:
    9,181
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +35,960

    I hope you aren't holding your breath.....
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page