Is there such thing as "universal morality"?

[ding]

How does dark energy increase?

It has a constant density.

And?

You can figure it out from there.

Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How does dark energy increase?

It has a constant density.

And?

You can figure it out from there.

Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.

Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.

 

[ding]

How does dark energy increase?

It has a constant density.

And?

You can figure it out from there.

Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.

Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.

So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It has a constant density.

And?

You can figure it out from there.

Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.

Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.

So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?

An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.

 

[ding]

And?

You can figure it out from there.

Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.

Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.

So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?

An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.

Interesting. Inflation theory which explains the flatness of the universe requires that it does.

Even the final state of thermal equilibrium conserves energy. It’s just that the energy lost as heat for every transaction is no longer useable. But it’s not lost for conservation purposes.

But to your point, in your previous answer you said dark energy increased so it isn’t that it isn’t conserved it’s that it is being created. How do you explain that?

 

[ding]

And?

You can figure it out from there.

Lol. Here’s your chance to show your stuff.

Hmm, no,you can figure it out. What happens to stuff when it has a constant density, and you increase the volume of it? Come on ding, this is pre-1989 math. You should be able to do it.

So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?

An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.

How does the creation of dark energy not violate the first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed? How does the creation of dark energy not violate the second law by causing entropy to decrease?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Inflation theory which explains the flatness of the universe requires that it does.

No. It only requires that of the CMB, really.

But to your point, in your previous answer you said dark energy increased so it isn’t that it isn’t conserved it’s that it is being created.

Which, of course, are the same thing, in this case.

I don't know how to explain it. A nobel prize awaits the person who can. Some explanations hypothesized include compensation by loss of energy of the CMB.

How does the creation of dark energy not violate the first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed?

It does. It appears that the law may not, in fact, hold for the system that is our observable universe. Or, alternatively, that our observable universe does not meet the conditions of a system in which the law holds, e.g., a closed system.

How does the creation of dark energy not violate the second law by causing entropy to decrease?

Because "empty", expanding space does not decrease entropy, as far as we know. And because dark energy does not appear to interact with regular energy, or regular matter, or dark matter. It seems only to affect spacetime itself.

 

[ding]

So what’s the First Law of Thermodynamics doing in all of this?

An excellent question! It does appear that the energy of the universe as a whole is not conserved, over time. Freaky.

Inflation theory which explains the flatness of the universe requires that it does. Even the final state of thermal equilibrium conserves energy. It’s just that the energy lost as heat for every transaction is no longer useable. But it’s not lost for conservation purposes.

No. It only requires that of the CMB, really.

What are you talking about? You aren't making any sense. CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT. You are the first person I have heard who claims dark energy creates matter and energy. Do you have a link that supports this preposterous position?

The cosmic microwave background (CMB, CMBR), in Big Bang cosmology, is electromagnetic radiation as a remnant from an early stage of the universe, also known as "relic radiation". The CMB is faint cosmic background radiation filling all space. It is an important source of data on the early universe because it is the oldest electromagnetic radiation in the universe, dating to the epoch of recombination.

Cosmic microwave background - Wikipedia

But to your point, in your previous answer you said dark energy increased so it isn’t that it isn’t conserved it’s that it is being created.

Which, of course, are the same thing, in this case.

No. It isn't. To say it isn't conserved is to say it isn't destroyed. You are arguing that the expansion of the universe is literally creating matter and energy. That is preposterous. Don't you believe it would be big news if the First Law of Thermodynamics were invalidated?

I don't know how to explain it. A nobel prize awaits the person who can. Some explanations hypothesized include compensation by loss of energy of the CMB.

That's because it isn't true that the First Law of Thermodynamics has been violated. You keep referring to the loss of energy of the CMB, but that doesn't make any sense at all. Do you have a link for this?

How does the creation of dark energy not violate the first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed?

It does. It appears that the law may not, in fact, hold for the system that is our observable universe. Or, alternatively, that our observable universe does not meet the conditions of a system in which the law holds, e.g., a closed system.

Do you have a link or a source for this?

How does the creation of dark energy not violate the second law by causing entropy to decrease?

Because "empty", expanding space does not decrease entropy, as far as we know. And because dark energy does not appear to interact with regular energy, or regular matter, or dark matter. It seems only to affect spacetime itself.

Do you have a link or source for this?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.

100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.

Do you have a link or a source for this?

Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.

 

[ding]

CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.

100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.

Do you have a link or a source for this?

Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.

I see you can’t provide one source I asked you to provide. You are full of shit.

 

[Taz]

CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.

100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.

Do you have a link or a source for this?

Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.

I see you can’t provide one source I asked you to provide. You are full of shit.

So are you, mr no link.

 

[ding]

CMB has nothing to do with the FLoT.

100% wrong, as far as using it to determine the geometry of our universe. Doing so relies 100% on the 1st law. Ding, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and shoild shut up immediately. Then, you should go read up on these topics.

Do you have a link or a source for this?

Yes. But you can look it up for yourself.

I see you can’t provide one source I asked you to provide. You are full of shit.

So are you, mr no link.

Which link do you want?