Steve Hanson
Active Member
- Aug 25, 2010
- 806
- 670
- 28
Well I am all for the second adm. just as it was written and everything should be the same. The law was written for the way things were at that time of our history and any weapon or ammo that was available then should be allowed today.
If not then we should allow allow all weapons like tanks, flame throwers and mortars as they were just extensions from the use of guns.
The purpose of the 2ND was to make sure that people had the weapons they needed to be part of the states militia if called upon because of a threat to the state. Why not fully automatic weapons and machine guns.
Give it a break guys, we don't have a state militia and there is no need for guns except for target shooting, hunting and KILLING. Lets get it straight, today we are not the same country we were in 1776.
We have an established army nationally and locally and nobody joins them bringing their own weapons.
Yea and I guess we don't need freedom of speech anymore because half of the country doesn't speak english.