Is there anyone who still believes in gun control?

Well I am all for the second adm. just as it was written and everything should be the same. The law was written for the way things were at that time of our history and any weapon or ammo that was available then should be allowed today.

If not then we should allow allow all weapons like tanks, flame throwers and mortars as they were just extensions from the use of guns.

The purpose of the 2ND was to make sure that people had the weapons they needed to be part of the states militia if called upon because of a threat to the state. Why not fully automatic weapons and machine guns.
Give it a break guys, we don't have a state militia and there is no need for guns except for target shooting, hunting and KILLING. Lets get it straight, today we are not the same country we were in 1776.
We have an established army nationally and locally and nobody joins them bringing their own weapons.

Yea and I guess we don't need freedom of speech anymore because half of the country doesn't speak english.
 
Well I am all for the second adm. just as it was written and everything should be the same. The law was written for the way things were at that time of our history and any weapon or ammo that was available then should be allowed today.

If not then we should allow allow all weapons like tanks, flame throwers and mortars as they were just extensions from the use of guns.

The purpose of the 2ND was to make sure that people had the weapons they needed to be part of the states militia if called upon because of a threat to the state. Why not fully automatic weapons and machine guns.
Give it a break guys, we don't have a state militia and there is no need for guns except for target shooting, hunting and KILLING. Lets get it straight, today we are not the same country we were in 1776.
We have an established army nationally and locally and nobody joins them bringing their own weapons.
So?
The principle behind the 2nd - that people need free access to the means to effectively exercise their right to self-defense, individually and collectively - applies every bit as much today as it ever has.
 
Well I am all for the second adm. just as it was written and everything should be the same. The law was written for the way things were at that time of our history and any weapon or ammo that was available then should be allowed today.

If not then we should allow allow all weapons like tanks, flame throwers and mortars as they were just extensions from the use of guns.

The purpose of the 2ND was to make sure that people had the weapons they needed to be part of the states militia if called upon because of a threat to the state. Why not fully automatic weapons and machine guns.
Give it a break guys, we don't have a state militia and there is no need for guns except for target shooting, hunting and KILLING. Lets get it straight, today we are not the same country we were in 1776.
We have an established army nationally and locally and nobody joins them bringing their own weapons.
So?
The principle behind the 2nd - that people need free access to the means to effectively exercise their right to self-defense, individually and collectively - applies every bit as much today as it ever has.

Liberals are always wanting to rewrite history and take away our freedoms to suit their needs.
 
OK I am sure many have seen these before but these are a few of my favs

Criminals For Gun Control 1 Home Invasion
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo]YouTube - Criminals For Gun Control 1 Home Invasion[/ame]

Criminals For Gun Control 2, Carjacker
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPwZeWOZ8JU]YouTube - Criminals For Gun Control 2, Carjacker[/ame]

Archie Bunker on Gun Control
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLjNJI54GMM]YouTube - Archie Bunker on Gun Control[/ame]

BULLSH#T! On Gun Laws Part 3
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoIKlO20RqM]YouTube - BULLSH#T! On Gun Laws Part 3[/ame]
Watch at 1:10

Myth: Gun Control Reduces Crime
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_YTM_eAWnQ]YouTube - Myth: Gun Control Reduces Crime[/ame]
Watch at 2:33
 
Well I am all for the second adm. just as it was written and everything should be the same. The law was written for the way things were at that time of our history and any weapon or ammo that was available then should be allowed today.
Why do you people think this is clever?
You fail to understand that if you think this is valid, you then have no standing to cry over the government not getting a warrant to tap your phone, cell or otherwise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top