Is there any doubt?

rtwngAvngr

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2004
15,755
512
48
Does anyone still have any doubts that our leaders are involved in the conspiracy to ruin america?

The Borders will not be proteced.

There will be amnesty for millions of illegal aliens, driving wages down to pennies.

Our population will change from whites with a heritage of freedom preservation, to non-whites, who are used to and thus more accepting of totalitarian oppression.

There will be no drilling off the coasts, so our dependance on other nations will be secured.

I'd like someone to come defend Bush and call me a wacko so I can laugh in your lying face.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Does anyone still have any doubts that our leaders are involved in the conspiracy to ruin america?

The Borders will not be proteced.

There will be amnesty for millions of illegal aliens, driving wages down to pennies.

Our population will change from whites with a heritage of freedom preservation, to non-whites, who are used to and thus more accepting of totalitarian oppression.

There will be no drilling off the coasts, so our dependance on other nations will be secured.

I'd like someone to come defend Bush and call me a wacko so I can laugh in your lying face.



I don't believe in your conspiracy theory. I think our leaders are just gutless cowards who fear their own shadow. Politics over the last 30 or more years has dealt mostly with avoiding any problem which might possible involve a solution that someone might disagree with. If a society continues delaying into the future decisions which must be made for its very political survival then that survival is in jeopardy. It really amounts to a group of politicians whom so fear they won't be reelected that no key decisions are made.

It is now up to the American people to change things. The pols we elect are not about to do a damn thing. We had better wake up very quickly or the country we once knew will be gone.
 
Rico said:
I don't believe in your conspiracy theory. I think our leaders are just gutless cowards who fear their own shadow. Politics over the last 30 or more years has dealt mostly with avoiding any problem which might possible involve a solution that someone might disagree with. If a society continues delaying into the future decisions which must be made for its very political survival then that survival is in jeopardy. It really amounts to a group of politicians whom so fear they won't be reelected that no key decisions are made.

It is now up to the American people to change things. The pols we elect are not about to do a damn thing. We had better wake up very quickly or the country we once knew will be gone.

No. It's obvious that anyone who took a hard stance on border would have a windfall at the polls. The New world order wins by controlling options presented. The pro immigration jews have used their influence to keep this option off the platform in both parties.
 
Check out this excerpt if you doubt me.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.asp?ID=22313&commentID=707793

For example, anthropologists under the leadership of Boas viewed their crusade against the concept of “race” as, in turn, combating anti-Semitism. They also saw their theories as promoting the ideology of cultural pluralism, which served perceived Jewish interests because the U.S. would be seen as consisting of many co-equal cultures rather than as a European Christian society.



Similarly, psychoanalysts commonly used their theories to portray anti-Jewish attitudes as symptoms of psychiatric disorder.



Conversely, the earlier generation of American Jewish Trotskyites ignored the horrors of the Soviet Union until the emergence there of state-sponsored anti-Semitism.



Neoconservatives have certainly appealed to American patriotic platitudes in advocating war throughout the Middle East—gushing about spreading American democracy and freedom to the area, while leaving unmentioned their own strong ethnic ties and family links to Israel.



Michael Lind has called attention to the neoconservatives’ “odd bursts of ideological enthusiasm for ‘democracy’”— odd because these calls for democracy and freedom throughout the Middle East are also coupled with support for the Likud Party and other like-minded groups in Israel that are driven by a vision of an ethnocentric, expansionist Israel that, to outside observers at least, bears an unmistakable (albeit unmentionable) resemblance to apartheid South Africa.



These inconsistencies of the neoconservatives are not odd or surprising. The Straussian idea is to achieve the aims of the elite ingroup by using language designed for mass appeal. War for “democracy and freedom” sells much better than a war explicitly aimed at achieving the foreign policy goals of Israel.



Neoconservatives have responded to charges that their foreign policy has a Jewish agenda by labeling any such analysis as “anti-Semitic.” Similar charges have been echoed by powerful activist Jewish organizations like the ADL and the Simon Wiesenthal Center.



But at the very least, Jewish neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz, who were deeply involved in pushing for the war in Iraq, should frankly discuss how their close family and personal ties to Israel have affected their attitudes on US foreign policy in the Middle East.



Wolfowitz, however, has refused to discuss this issue beyond terming such suggestions “disgraceful.”



A common argument is that neoconservatism is not Jewish because of the presence of various non-Jews amongst their ranks.



But in fact, the ability to recruit prominent non-Jews, while nevertheless maintaining a Jewish core and a commitment to Jewish interests, has been a hallmark—perhaps the key hallmark—of influential Jewish intellectual and political movements throughout the 20th century. Freud commented famously on the need for a non-Jew to represent psychoanalysis, a role played by Ernest Jones and C. G. Jung. Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict were the public face of Boasian anthropology. And, although Jews represented over half the membership of both the Socialist Party and the Communist Party USA at various times, neither party ever had Jews as presidential candidates and no Jew held the top position in the Communist Party USA after 1929.



In all the Jewish intellectual and political movements I reviewed, non-Jews have been accepted and given highly-visible roles. Today, those roles are played most prominently by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld whose ties with neoconservatives go back many years. It makes excellent psychological sense to have the spokespeople for any movement resemble the people they are trying to convince.



In fact, neoconservatism is rather unusual in the degree to which policy formulation — as opposed to implementation — is so predominantly Jewish. Perhaps this reflects U.S. conditions in the late 20th century.



All the Jewish intellectual and political movements I studied were typified by a deep sense of orthodoxy—a sense of “us versus them.” Dissenters are expelled, usually amid character assassination and other recriminations.
 
Veronica: You took a big chance knocking down that guy.
Det. Frank Drebin: I know. You take a chance getting up in the morning, crossing the street, or sticking your face in a fan.
 
misterblu said:
Does the tinfoil make your head itch? It does, doesn't it. :funnyface

No. But the destruction of a freedom centered america, brings a tear to my eye, Like Chief CleanPrairie.

ironeyescodykabpsa.jpg
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Dillo, come on. It's not some vast conspiracy. It's lowest common denominator politics.

Yes. It is. The jews have been playing race politics for about 50 or so years in america.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Dillo, come on. It's not some vast conspiracy. It's lowest common denominator politics.

I'm not claiming a vast conspiracy. It's merely one element that is occuring in the crazy world of American politics. Everyone has an agenda--are you claiming that the Jews don't ?
 
dilloduck said:
I'm not claiming a vast conspiracy. It's merely one element that is occuring in the crazy world of American politics. Everyone has an agenda--are you claiming that the Jews don't ?
Certainly not at a conspiratorial level, and certainly not to the zeal that you do.

You all make it sound like they have secret jew meetings where the agenda is:

Welcome
Last meeting's minutes
Approval of minutes
Prayer
Discussion of opposing closed borders vs. benefits to jews as a whole
Meal
Chair Dance
Closing
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Certainly not at a conspiratorial level, and certainly not to the zeal that you do.

You all make it sound like they have secret jew meetings where the agenda is:

Welcome
Last meeting's minutes
Approval of minutes
Prayer
Discussion of opposing closed borders vs. benefits to jews as a whole
Meal
Chair Dance
Closing


Clay, Why don't you do some research. Jews have openly stated they feel safest in a multiracial, multicultural context. So to satisfy their own paranoia, they're willing to make america #1 in the race to the bottom.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Certainly not at a conspiratorial level, and certainly not to the zeal that you do.

You all make it sound like they have secret jew meetings where the agenda is:

Welcome
Last meeting's minutes
Approval of minutes
Prayer
Discussion of opposing closed borders vs. benefits to jews as a whole
Meal
Chair Dance
Closing


pretty far off really --try this link from PBS
http://www.pbs.org/itvs/fromswastikatojimcrow/relations.html
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Clay, Why don't you do some research. Jews have openly stated they feel safest in a multiracial, multicultural context. So to satisfy their own paranoia, they're willing to make america #1 in the race to the bottom.
I don't need to "research" like you have. Your "sources" are dubious and comical, at best.

You've overblown this so far out of proportion its transitioned from a stretch to funny to now just sad. Go out and DO something with your life instead of looking for all these excuses for how you're being held down in some conspiratorial plot.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top