Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You give a shit about your pedophile prophet Muhammad, dildo.
Looks like are are about as talented in reading minds as you are sexing up some kosher incest!
Muhammad committing incest in marrying his former daughter-in-law, Zaynab.
You proud of your degenerate prophet, dildo?
Looks like are are about as talented in reading minds as you are sexing up some kosher incest!
Muhammad committing incest in marrying his former daughter-in-law, Zaynab.
You proud of your degenerate prophet, dildo?
Are you NOW trying to rationalize DAUGHTER FUCKING, Lot39?
Muhammad committing incest in marrying his former daughter-in-law, Zaynab.
You proud of your degenerate prophet, dildo?
Are you NOW trying to rationalize DAUGHTER FUCKING, Lot39?
Your religious leader rationalized incest. Deal with it.
Are you NOW trying to rationalize DAUGHTER FUCKING, Lot39?
Your religious leader rationalized incest. Deal with it.
Sorry, ****.. you are WAAAAaaaay off the mark on that one; i'm not a muslim.
Maybe you should STOP dealing with daughter hymens instead of doling out advice to others, eh LOT39?
Your religious leader rationalized incest. Deal with it.
Sorry, ****.. you are WAAAAaaaay off the mark on that one; i'm not a muslim.
Maybe you should STOP dealing with daughter hymens instead of doling out advice to others, eh LOT39?
Allah is the greatest, right, Muslim fucker?
Sorry, ****.. you are WAAAAaaaay off the mark on that one; i'm not a muslim.
Maybe you should STOP dealing with daughter hymens instead of doling out advice to others, eh LOT39?
Allah is the greatest, right, Muslim fucker?
I'm of the opinion that most organized religions suck, DAUGHTER PROWLER. Even your jewish OT boogity boogity fire and brimstone DAUGHTER FUCKING, she bear stone age cult.
Allah is the greatest, right, Muslim fucker?
I'm of the opinion that most organized religions suck, DAUGHTER PROWLER. Even your jewish OT boogity boogity fire and brimstone DAUGHTER FUCKING, she bear stone age cult.
Forget to take your anxiety medication?
What drives Israel is survival.
The reason the "peace process" is inherently flawed is because only one side wants peace.
The arabs want to destroy Israel, and Israel actually wants peace.
A peace process only works when both sides want peace. This is not the case.
Every nation has its historical narrative.
What much of europe sees as foolish intransigence is seen by Israel as an imperative for preservation of the nation. European attitudes are much of the source of Israeli intransigence.
yeah, but for some inexplicable reason, israel is the only country whose people are supposed to die to accommodate terrorists.
how intransigent of israelis not to lie down and die.
hmmm....should the Palestinians be expected to lie down and die?
I thought that some of the premises laid out by the author were interesting becuase they explain Israel's obession with controlling the narrative - whether it's internationally (via AIPAC or CAMERA) or internally - by limiting coverage and access to Gaza. He may not be totally right (or wrong) but he provokes thought beyond the usual cliches.
Unfortunately, the thread has deginerated into the usual lobbing of insults from the usual parties....
What drives Israel is survival.
The reason the "peace process" is inherently flawed is because only one side wants peace.
The arabs want to destroy Israel, and Israel actually wants peace.
A peace process only works when both sides want peace. This is not the case.
If "Israel" meant more than "We Jews" then you'd have a point. as it is, you are no better than South Africa during the early 80s crying about all those non-whites who wanted equality on land that they were purged from.
What drives Israel is survival.
The reason the "peace process" is inherently flawed is because only one side wants peace.
The arabs want to destroy Israel, and Israel actually wants peace.
A peace process only works when both sides want peace. This is not the case.
yeah, but for some inexplicable reason, israel is the only country whose people are supposed to die to accommodate terrorists.
how intransigent of israelis not to lie down and die.
hmmm....should the Palestinians be expected to lie down and die?
I thought that some of the premises laid out by the author were interesting becuase they explain Israel's obession with controlling the narrative - whether it's internationally (via AIPAC or CAMERA) or internally - by limiting coverage and access to Gaza. He may not be totally right (or wrong) but he provokes thought beyond the usual cliches.
Unfortunately, the thread has deginerated into the usual lobbing of insults from the usual parties....
"Palestinians" should be expected to sit and negotiate with Israel. They refuse to do that. Thus they refuse to have peace.
If one side picks war, and the other side doesn't engate, that side will be destroyed.
yeah, but for some inexplicable reason, israel is the only country whose people are supposed to die to accommodate terrorists.
how intransigent of israelis not to lie down and die.
hmmm....should the Palestinians be expected to lie down and die?
I thought that some of the premises laid out by the author were interesting becuase they explain Israel's obession with controlling the narrative - whether it's internationally (via AIPAC or CAMERA) or internally - by limiting coverage and access to Gaza. He may not be totally right (or wrong) but he provokes thought beyond the usual cliches.
Unfortunately, the thread has deginerated into the usual lobbing of insults from the usual parties....
"Palestinians" should be expected to sit and negotiate with Israel. They refuse to do that. Thus they refuse to have peace.
If one side picks war, and the other side doesn't engate, that side will be destroyed.
What drives Israel is survival.
The reason the "peace process" is inherently flawed is because only one side wants peace.
The arabs want to destroy Israel, and Israel actually wants peace.
A peace process only works when both sides want peace. This is not the case.
If "Israel" meant more than "We Jews" then you'd have a point. as it is, you are no better than South Africa during the early 80s crying about all those non-whites who wanted equality on land that they were purged from.
Nice try.
The problem with your "theory" is that there are arabs who are Israeli citizens and represented in the Israeli parliament.
hmmm....should the Palestinians be expected to lie down and die?
I thought that some of the premises laid out by the author were interesting becuase they explain Israel's obession with controlling the narrative - whether it's internationally (via AIPAC or CAMERA) or internally - by limiting coverage and access to Gaza. He may not be totally right (or wrong) but he provokes thought beyond the usual cliches.
Unfortunately, the thread has deginerated into the usual lobbing of insults from the usual parties....
"Palestinians" should be expected to sit and negotiate with Israel. They refuse to do that. Thus they refuse to have peace.
If one side picks war, and the other side doesn't engate, that side will be destroyed.
HA! yea.. "negotiate" as in "ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS LAND IS FOR JEWS PRIMARILY AND FOREMOST".
If jews were in the pali's shoes right now we all know your big tough bravado would take a different tenor.
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Israel-History-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0688123635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1278448963&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Israel: A History (9780688123635): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]Palestine of today, the land we now know as Palestine, was peopled by the Jews from the dawn of history until the Roman era. It is the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people. They were driven from it by force by the relentless Roman military machine and for centuries prevented from returning. At different periods various alien people succeeded them but the Jewish race had left an indelible impress upon the land.
Today it is a Jewish country. Every name, every landmark, every monument and every trace of whatever civilization remaining there is still Jewish. And it has ever since remained a hope, a longing, as expressed in their prayers for these nearly 2,000 years. No other people has ever claimed Palestine as their national home. No other people has ever shown an aptitude or indicated a genuine desire to make it their homeland. The land has been ruled by foreigners. Only since the beginning of the modern Zionist effort may it be said that a creative, cultural, and economic force has entered Palestine. The Jewish Nation was forced from its natural home. It did not go because it wanted to.
A perusal of Jewish history, a reading of Josephus, will convince the most skeptical that the grandest fight that was ever put up against an enemy was put up by the Jew. He never thought of leaving Palestine. But he was driven out. But did he, when driven out, give up his hope of getting back? Jewish history and Jewish literature give the answer to the question. The Jew even has a fast day devoted to the day of destruction of the Jewish homeland.
Never throughout history did they give up hope of returning there. I am told that 90 per cent of the Jews today are praying for the return of the Jewish people to its own home. The best minds among them believe in the necessity of reestablishing their Jewish land. To my mind there is something prophetic in the fact that during the ages no other nation has taken over Palestine and held it in the sense of a homeland; and there is something providential in the fact that for 1,800 years it has remained in desolation as if waiting for the return of the people.
Thanks for making my point that the palestinians don't want peace they want the destruction of Israel.
hmmm....should the Palestinians be expected to lie down and die?
I thought that some of the premises laid out by the author were interesting becuase they explain Israel's obession with controlling the narrative - whether it's internationally (via AIPAC or CAMERA) or internally - by limiting coverage and access to Gaza. He may not be totally right (or wrong) but he provokes thought beyond the usual cliches.
Unfortunately, the thread has deginerated into the usual lobbing of insults from the usual parties....
"Palestinians" should be expected to sit and negotiate with Israel. They refuse to do that. Thus they refuse to have peace.
If one side picks war, and the other side doesn't engate, that side will be destroyed.
Israel has refused to sit and negotiate with the Palestinians at times.
"Palestinians" should be expected to sit and negotiate with Israel. They refuse to do that. Thus they refuse to have peace.
If one side picks war, and the other side doesn't engate, that side will be destroyed.
HA! yea.. "negotiate" as in "ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS LAND IS FOR JEWS PRIMARILY AND FOREMOST".
If jews were in the pali's shoes right now we all know your big tough bravado would take a different tenor.
Palestine is Jewish land, moron. I'll kick your dumb ass.
The United States Congressional Record
1922 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
National Home for
THE JEWISH PEOPLE JUNE 30, 1922
HOUSE RESOLUTION 360 - UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Israel-History-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0688123635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1278448963&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Israel: A History (9780688123635): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]Palestine of today, the land we now know as Palestine, was peopled by the Jews from the dawn of history until the Roman era. It is the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people. They were driven from it by force by the relentless Roman military machine and for centuries prevented from returning. At different periods various alien people succeeded them but the Jewish race had left an indelible impress upon the land.
Today it is a Jewish country. Every name, every landmark, every monument and every trace of whatever civilization remaining there is still Jewish. And it has ever since remained a hope, a longing, as expressed in their prayers for these nearly 2,000 years. No other people has ever claimed Palestine as their national home. No other people has ever shown an aptitude or indicated a genuine desire to make it their homeland. The land has been ruled by foreigners. Only since the beginning of the modern Zionist effort may it be said that a creative, cultural, and economic force has entered Palestine. The Jewish Nation was forced from its natural home. It did not go because it wanted to.
A perusal of Jewish history, a reading of Josephus, will convince the most skeptical that the grandest fight that was ever put up against an enemy was put up by the Jew. He never thought of leaving Palestine. But he was driven out. But did he, when driven out, give up his hope of getting back? Jewish history and Jewish literature give the answer to the question. The Jew even has a fast day devoted to the day of destruction of the Jewish homeland.
Never throughout history did they give up hope of returning there. I am told that 90 per cent of the Jews today are praying for the return of the Jewish people to its own home. The best minds among them believe in the necessity of reestablishing their Jewish land. To my mind there is something prophetic in the fact that during the ages no other nation has taken over Palestine and held it in the sense of a homeland; and there is something providential in the fact that for 1,800 years it has remained in desolation as if waiting for the return of the people.
