That seems to be the latest rightwing attack strategy since the racist label backfired but, as usual, facts supporting that allegation appear lacking. Entire article - including an analysis here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...oryId=105343155 What is that difference Senator Graham? http://psacot.typepad.com/ps_a_column_on_t...ars-briefs.html http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/30/scali...ivacy-invasion/ While I think that often the gender card, like the race card -is overplayed, I don't think that's the case here. Apparently - if a man dominates oral arguments, doesn't take any guff he is "assertive". If a woman dominates oral arguments, doesn't take any guff she is "overly aggressive", a "bully". It amazes me the level of character assassination they will stoop to, perhaps because they can't actually attack her qualifications.