Is Ron Paul Irrelevant Yet?

Rick Perry was toast, well, everywhere. So your obserations and opinion are virtually (pun intended) as irrelevent as you think Ron Paul is.
 
Anyone saying Ron Paul is irrelevant is blind. They also don't know the rules governing the delegate process or voting at the convention. They are also blissfully unaware of what is happening across the country in the local GOP races as well as local government races.

I have some facts for you.

The delegate count touted by the MSM is wrong and Ron Paul is set to get a plurality of delegates in many states such as WA, ME, IA, AK, and MO to name a few. Very nearly ever caucus state will in the end be won by Ron Paul. Even the delegates spots that are bound are being won Ron Paul supporters. When you are adding delegate totals you might as well add at least half of Santorums and Gingriches totals to Ron Pauls because once they drop their delegates become unbound and they will go to Ron Paul. I don't know the exact numbers but I do know that many of them are Ron Paul supporters.

We are infiltrating every pore of the GOP and you will be assimilated. BWAHAHAHAAHA. In Nevada two of the largest republican counties OP committees have been taken over by Ron Paul supporters. Iowa just elected the state coordinator for the Ron Paul campaign to be the State Chairman of the GOP. In Mo after the shady caucus the Mo election board saw a flood of filings for GOP and local offices and they are all Ron Paul supporters. This is happening in every single state. Do you think we are going to go away? Do you think we just support Paul? If you do then you don't understand us. We support Liberty and Individual Responsibility not a man even if he is a great man. Ron Paul may not be remembered as the godfather of the tea party but he will be rememebered as the father of the Liberty Movement within the GOP.



This is no longer YOUR GOP grandpa there is a new GOP coming your way that is liberty minded and principled. Get on board or get out of the way!

I want what you're smoking. Ron Paul will not now or ever be even close to the nominee.
 
I did not indicate that the libertarian party will suddenly snag congressional seats and become relevant in the lame stream media. What it could do is hold enough members to garner more swing votes and perhaps even defected GOP members who are bound to throw up another lemon like Romney in 2016. So the independents, and in turn the libertarian party could hold more water in future elections...that is, if we have future elections....
You know, I don't even care about that any more. The system is so far gone that it's just a matter of time before it collapses under its own weight. Hopefully it will happen sooner rather than later. Worst case scenario is that we become a government zombie like Europe, where it will matter even less for whom one votes.

This is the meme of the narco-libertarians:
-The US is hurtling towards socialism
-The two parties are exactly the same
-Ron Paul and narco-libertarianism represent real progress
-Anyone opposed to them is a fascist.
-Paul's lack of support is either due to media manipulation or a conspiracy by the GOP.

They are wrong on all points.
 
I did not indicate that the libertarian party will suddenly snag congressional seats and become relevant in the lame stream media. What it could do is hold enough members to garner more swing votes and perhaps even defected GOP members who are bound to throw up another lemon like Romney in 2016. So the independents, and in turn the libertarian party could hold more water in future elections...that is, if we have future elections....
You know, I don't even care about that any more. The system is so far gone that it's just a matter of time before it collapses under its own weight. Hopefully it will happen sooner rather than later. Worst case scenario is that we become a government zombie like Europe, where it will matter even less for whom one votes.

This is the meme of the narco-libertarians:
-The US is hurtling towards socialism
-The two parties are exactly the same
-Ron Paul and narco-libertarianism represent real progress
-Anyone opposed to them is a fascist.
-Paul's lack of support is either due to media manipulation or a conspiracy by the GOP.

They are wrong on all points.
Because you said so.

Got it.
 
Rick Perry was toast, well, everywhere. So your obserations and opinion are virtually (pun intended) as irrelevent as you think Ron Paul is.

Rick Perry is very relevant as governor of Texas. Texas just won a big case against the EPA. Perry works for liberty. Paul just mouths off about it.
 
Rick Perry was toast, well, everywhere. So your obserations and opinion are virtually (pun intended) as irrelevent as you think Ron Paul is.

Rick Perry is very relevant as governor of Texas. Texas just won a big case against the EPA. Perry works for liberty. Paul just mouths off about it.
Hope someone reminds him to dismantle it when he gets into the White House.

Rick Perry fails to remember what agency he'd get rid of in GOP debate - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

:lmao:
 
So having performed about like he did last time he ran, which is to say sucks, Ron Paul is still in the race. There is no way he can become the nominee. The news media aren't even talking much about him. And his predictions and those of his k00k followers haven't panned out In fact the only think panned is Paul.
So what is his strategy going forward? Have we seen the last of Ron Paul?

is ron paul irrelevant yet?

who???
 
These flame threads are hilarious. Always the same folks coming in with their uninformed soundbites. I wonder if they think it hurts the feelings of Paul supporters after two election cycles of syaing the same thing....no, actually I don't.

I know that is what it is about. But coming from a Rick Perry supporter?? Calling Ron irrelevant?

:lmao:

The ironing is absolutely delicious.
 
This just goes to show how much the republican party has changed over the past 30 years. The poster child for the party then was Milton Friedman. Now republicans cringe at the thought of freedom or liberty.
 
These flame threads are hilarious. Always the same folks coming in with their uninformed soundbites. I wonder if they think it hurts the feelings of Paul supporters after two election cycles of syaing the same thing....no, actually I don't.

I know that is what it is about. But coming from a Rick Perry supporter?? Calling Ron irrelevant?

:lmao:

The ironing is absolutely delicious.

Well that's essentially american politics in 2012.

How famous someone is should determine whether or not you vote for them.

Ryan Seacrest 2012!!!
 
LA Examiner Propels Ron Paul Into the Future - FishbowlLA

Thursday night in Los Angeles, presidential candidate Ron Paul broke his own attendance record, actually set the night before in Chico, California. The news media doesn't always pick up on the subtle, or even the obvious details that set Paul's feverish supporters apart from the typical pack. While the Chico attendance was recorded at six thousand four hundred, the media reported it as "hundreds" of participants.

At the UCLA event, participants had waited as long as nine hours, standing in line, wearing t-shirts, holding signs, chanting, and encouraging political discourse with each other. Of course, they had much to agree with each other, as Paul's supporter's are typically enthralled with his long-standing record of one-message, without changing points of view very often.

Even as this article goes to print, as Paul set a new attendance record (estimates have ranged form seven to ten thousand), the only mention of Paul on the Fox news site is "Paul Increasingly Absent From Campaign." This continuously frustrates his supporters, who turn out in significantly larger numbers than any other candidate in the race.



Somewhere between 7000 to 10,000 people waiting 9 hours just to hear him speak and you call him irrelevant? This is the day after another speech where 6200 turned out and last week he had 5200. Get your head out of the sand.
 
They will figure it out at the convention. As if the media is going to give Paul any due diligence in reporting.
 
So having performed about like he did last time he ran, which is to say sucks, Ron Paul is still in the race. There is no way he can become the nominee. The news media aren't even talking much about him. And his predictions and those of his k00k followers haven't panned out In fact the only think panned is Paul.
So what is his strategy going forward? Have we seen the last of Ron Paul?

is ron paul irrelevant yet?

who???

awwwwwwwwwww.... apparently the above post inflamed one of our more mentally ill posters... :rofl:

Hi, you have received -167 reputation points from Crackerjack.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
Go fuck yourself in the mouth with a twelve gauge, fucking XXXX.

Regards,
Crackerjack
 
So im curious, the Paul supports are sure that Romney is going to lose. You guys were also telling us Ron Paul was going to win, especially with his delegate strategy.

What makes your assement of Romney's chances any better than your assessment of Paul's?
 
These flame threads are hilarious. Always the same folks coming in with their uninformed soundbites. I wonder if they think it hurts the feelings of Paul supporters after two election cycles of syaing the same thing....no, actually I don't.

I know that is what it is about. But coming from a Rick Perry supporter?? Calling Ron irrelevant?

:lmao:

The ironing is absolutely delicious.

Yeah, pretty predictable stuff. These are the same people who just nominated a Liberal/Mormon as their Presidential Nominee. Talk about a Landslide Victory for Obama? Yikes! You can't expect too much from these people. They're completely lost. Hopefully after their guy gets destroyed by Obama, they'll begin to come to their senses. I hope so anyway.
 

Forum List

Back
Top