is obama the biggest whiner ever elected president?

[Wry Catcher]

"It's hard work"
"It's hard work"

-GW Bush.

I'd suggest defining "Whiner", given anyone who sees wrongs and hopes to right them might be called a "Whiner".
Those who "Whine" everyday that Obama&Co are (Commies, Marxists, Socialists) or that Obama is a Muslim, born outside the U.S., better defines "whiner".

Rush Limbaugh - though not POTUS - is the de facto leader of the RW whiners. Of course we might add Palin and Gingrich but none of these are elected officials. As for elected whiners there is no one more 'whiny' then Boehner. Bachman comes close but to differentiate whining and wacko may confuse the issue.

As for a POTUS, who whined all the way to the inauguration of FDR? Herbert Hoover gets my vote.

 

[beowolfe]

he whined about the condition the country was in when he became president, and now he's whining about campaign ads. i don't remember any president blaming the one before him, either implicitly or explicitly, and obama had no problem not disclosing his donors completely when it suited him, yet somehow it's a bad thing when the shoe is on the other foot.

other presidents have inherited bigger problems and faced worse obstacles, yet none of them whined about it publicly that i can remember.

i'm tired of it, and it's painfully clear to me that he's not fit to be president, especially at a time when the country needs real leadership. this has nothing to do with his policies, and everything to do with him as a person.

poll to follow.

No he's not.

Bush Blames Clinton Again - Truthdig

Posted on Oct 12, 2006

Left: forbes.com/Right: time.blogs.com

George W. Bush, retreating to familiar ground, has blamed the Clinton administration for North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. But the official who brokered the Clinton-era deal with North Korea called the idea “ludicrous,” and defended his efforts.

__________________________________________________________________________

Abd this was SIX years AFTER Dubya took office.

 

[kwc57]

he whined about the condition the country was in when he became president, and now he's whining about campaign ads. i don't remember any president blaming the one before him, either implicitly or explicitly, and obama had no problem not disclosing his donors completely when it suited him, yet somehow it's a bad thing when the shoe is on the other foot.

other presidents have inherited bigger problems and faced worse obstacles, yet none of them whined about it publicly that i can remember.

i'm tired of it, and it's painfully clear to me that he's not fit to be president, especially at a time when the country needs real leadership. this has nothing to do with his policies, and everything to do with him as a person.

poll to follow.

Let's get a collection going to by him a wheel of cheese to go with the whine.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Nixon after Watergate started coming out would give big 0 a run, but that was only a few months.

I don't think Reagan blamed Carter, but he did blame liberal policies.

Bush Sr, I don't recall anything from him.

Clinton was a rock star to the lib media and he still cried like bitch when they couldn't cover him anymore.

The books don't list Presidents whinieness.

It's like obama is a spoiled child that pouts when he doesn't get his way.

 

[Two Thumbs]

he whined about the condition the country was in when he became president, and now he's whining about campaign ads. i don't remember any president blaming the one before him, either implicitly or explicitly, and obama had no problem not disclosing his donors completely when it suited him, yet somehow it's a bad thing when the shoe is on the other foot.

other presidents have inherited bigger problems and faced worse obstacles, yet none of them whined about it publicly that i can remember.

i'm tired of it, and it's painfully clear to me that he's not fit to be president, especially at a time when the country needs real leadership. this has nothing to do with his policies, and everything to do with him as a person.

poll to follow.

No he's not.

Bush Blames Clinton Again - Truthdig

Posted on Oct 12, 2006

Left: forbes.com/Right: time.blogs.com

George W. Bush, retreating to familiar ground, has blamed the Clinton administration for North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. But the official who brokered the Clinton-era deal with North Korea called the idea “ludicrous,” and defended his efforts.

__________________________________________________________________________

Abd this was SIX years AFTER Dubya took office.

Such a program would violate the Agreed Framework. When the Bush administration decided it had conclusive proof of that enrichment in July 2002, it confronted North Korea and terminated fuel oil deliveries promised under the Agreed Framework. In response, North Korea evicted the inspectors, restarted the reactor and retrieved weapons-grade plutonium from 8,000 fuel rods that had been kept in a cooling pond. Intelligence analysts now think that, before Monday’s apparent nuclear test, North Korea had enough plutonium for as many as a dozen weapons.

It was 2 year moron. And what does that have to do with the economy? oh yeah, we GAVE NK oil to not build a nuke plant.

Did you even read it?

 

[Jeremy]

 

[Zoom-boing]

 

[beowolfe]

he whined about the condition the country was in when he became president, and now he's whining about campaign ads. i don't remember any president blaming the one before him, either implicitly or explicitly, and obama had no problem not disclosing his donors completely when it suited him, yet somehow it's a bad thing when the shoe is on the other foot.

other presidents have inherited bigger problems and faced worse obstacles, yet none of them whined about it publicly that i can remember.

i'm tired of it, and it's painfully clear to me that he's not fit to be president, especially at a time when the country needs real leadership. this has nothing to do with his policies, and everything to do with him as a person.

poll to follow.

No he's not.

Bush Blames Clinton Again - Truthdig

Posted on Oct 12, 2006

Left: forbes.com/Right: time.blogs.com

George W. Bush, retreating to familiar ground, has blamed the Clinton administration for North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. But the official who brokered the Clinton-era deal with North Korea called the idea “ludicrous,” and defended his efforts.

__________________________________________________________________________

Abd this was SIX years AFTER Dubya took office.

Such a program would violate the Agreed Framework. When the Bush administration decided it had conclusive proof of that enrichment in July 2002, it confronted North Korea and terminated fuel oil deliveries promised under the Agreed Framework. In response, North Korea evicted the inspectors, restarted the reactor and retrieved weapons-grade plutonium from 8,000 fuel rods that had been kept in a cooling pond. Intelligence analysts now think that, before Monday’s apparent nuclear test, North Korea had enough plutonium for as many as a dozen weapons.

It was 2 year moron. And what does that have to do with the economy? oh yeah, we GAVE NK oil to not build a nuke plant.

Did you even read it?

Moron? And this coming from the idiot who can't see the date on the article. Besides, the thread is about whinning, not whether the whine has any validity. Because if we're going there, Obama's whines about Dubya are all valid!!

 

[Greenbeard]

When you bring in a new guy to do a workout, he's SUPPOSED to know why he got hired and is only wasting his time and insulting your intelligence when he keeps referring to what a mess he "inherited"

Yes, we know that already dipshit, that's why the People hired you.

I'll agree that Obama is a bit Reaganesque on that front.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

When you bring in a new guy to do a workout, he's SUPPOSED to know why he got hired and is only wasting his time and insulting your intelligence when he keeps referring to what a mess he "inherited"

Yes, we know that already dipshit, that's why the People hired you.

I'll agree that Obama is a bit Reaganesque on that front.

Do you understand the difference between a executive like Reagan in the middle of a successful workout contrasting his achievements against a rube like Barry H. Obama who can only whine and complain about how difficult the assignment is?

 

[The T]

truly an idiot savant of the genre

kudos

So the take away here is that Conservatives have mastered the art of "Ass Kicked" as Opposed to "Kicking Ass" both in the cyber and physical realms.

"We won" and run away..without specifics..well without anything is the strategy.

Got it.

You don't win.

You lose.

Good GAWD... you really are full of it...

Seconded.