Is Mitt the reps John Kerry?

[whitehall]

Remembering back to the 2004 elections the Dems were running against a rather disliked republican incumbent. Bush had done some really poor things in his first term and people were really against him. first he allowed an attack on a civilian target on US soil. he then lied about WMDs and went to war with an uninvolved country costing billions of dollars. He was ignoring the boogieman of 9/11 which he created. The tech bubble had burst, and he was helping his friends get cheap labor overseas. It seemed like the Dems could not lose as long as they did not run someone completely fucked up.

And so they had a lackluster primary with a bunch of fuckwits. john kerry came out on top. John was a truly boring candidate with no ideas and a shitty connection to the voters. His main selling point was anything but bush, which was a pretty big selling point for the left. John showed the US the problem with a campaign that is run on the problems of the incumbent. yes, there was bitter fighting over who would get there, but when the election came around John had a supposed plan he never got into details about, he could only inspire the core of the party which was going to vote no matter who ran, and Bush squeeked by.

now we have another boring MA leader who is running on an anything but the incumbent platform. he has no defined plan, he is boring as hell, he is disconnected from the people, and even in his own party he is an oddball. Just like in 2004 america is being beaten to death on a couple of issues, but it is not electrifying the party candidate slamming the incumbent. Mitt had a boost when his party rallied around him, but he is not firing america up. just like john he doesn't even fire up his own party. By the time the election comes around people are not going to want to hear about the decided obamacare, just like they didn't want to hear about the quagmire of iraq anymore. The economy and jobs will pick up as they do every year between halloween and christmas, people will feel good, and hate for the fuck ups of the incumbent will subside because people are in a better mood.

So who thinks Romney is the republican's John kerry?

9-11 terrorists were attending flight school in the US while the president was diddling Monica and radicals blame it on a republican . Democrats approved boots on the ground in Iraq and lefties confuse Bush with Harry Truman. No wonder they elected Hussein.

 

[Kerry Won Ohio]

Is Mitt the reps John Kerry?

No, he’s far less qualified than Kerry; yes in that he’ll lose this November.

Some people may have disliked Bush but Kerry is hated by many. Other than teaching sleeze on a post grad. level I don't know what he'd be qualified for. He was very lucky to be rejected.

Kerry was more than enough qualified to rip that stuttering monkey Bush a new asshole in 3 debates.

That fat fuck Rush Limbaugh had to chew out his callers the day after the first debate because even the most pathetically biased Repugs kept whining and crying about how Kerry destroyed Bush.

The ONLY thing Bush was ever qualified for was bankrupting 3 oil companies and then begging Daddy for help each time.

And Bush is also an expert at deserting the Alabama Air National Guard, of course, which is EXACTLY what he did in 1972 during his alcohol and drug binge days.

And yet stupid Repug mother fuckers like you STILL voted for him. And smart folks like me knew back in 1999 that Bush was a total empty suit and would be a horrible President, which is why I didn't vote for him.

 

[Kerry Won Ohio]

Is Mitt the reps John Kerry?

No, he’s far less qualified than Kerry; yes in that he’ll lose this November.

Some people may have disliked Bush but Kerry is hated by many. Other than teaching sleeze on a post grad. level I don't know what he'd be qualified for. He was very lucky to be rejected.

Kerry was more than enough qualified to rip that stuttering monkey Bush a new asshole in 3 debates.

That fat fuck Rush Limbaugh had to chew out his callers the day after the first debate because even the most pathetically biased Repugs kept whining and crying about how Kerry destroyed Bush.

The ONLY thing Bush was ever qualified for was bankrupting 3 oil companies and then begging Daddy for help each time.

And Bush is also an expert at deserting the Alabama Air National Guard, of course, which is EXACTLY what he did in 1972 during his alcohol and drug binge days.

And yet stupid Repug mother fuckers like you STILL voted for him. And smart folks like me knew back in 1999 that Bush was a total empty suit and would be a horrible President, which is why I didn't vote for him.

And I was right and you were wrong. Hence, your political opinions were meaningless back then and they are still meaningless now.

 

[Sallow]

Remembering back to the 2004 elections the Dems were running against a rather disliked republican incumbent. Bush had done some really poor things in his first term and people were really against him. first he allowed an attack on a civilian target on US soil. he then lied about WMDs and went to war with an uninvolved country costing billions of dollars. He was ignoring the boogieman of 9/11 which he created. The tech bubble had burst, and he was helping his friends get cheap labor overseas. It seemed like the Dems could not lose as long as they did not run someone completely fucked up.

And so they had a lackluster primary with a bunch of fuckwits. john kerry came out on top. John was a truly boring candidate with no ideas and a shitty connection to the voters. His main selling point was anything but bush, which was a pretty big selling point for the left. John showed the US the problem with a campaign that is run on the problems of the incumbent. yes, there was bitter fighting over who would get there, but when the election came around John had a supposed plan he never got into details about, he could only inspire the core of the party which was going to vote no matter who ran, and Bush squeeked by.

now we have another boring MA leader who is running on an anything but the incumbent platform. he has no defined plan, he is boring as hell, he is disconnected from the people, and even in his own party he is an oddball. Just like in 2004 america is being beaten to death on a couple of issues, but it is not electrifying the party candidate slamming the incumbent. Mitt had a boost when his party rallied around him, but he is not firing america up. just like john he doesn't even fire up his own party. By the time the election comes around people are not going to want to hear about the decided obamacare, just like they didn't want to hear about the quagmire of iraq anymore. The economy and jobs will pick up as they do every year between halloween and christmas, people will feel good, and hate for the fuck ups of the incumbent will subside because people are in a better mood.

So who thinks Romney is the republican's John kerry?

Naw.

Kerry is an actual American war hero that conservatives shitted on.

Romney is an actual elitist cowardly piece of shit that conservatives elevated to the status of American hero.

 

[TruthSeeker56]

Remembering back to the 2004 elections the Dems were running against a rather disliked republican incumbent. Bush had done some really poor things in his first term and people were really against him. first he allowed an attack on a civilian target on US soil. he then lied about WMDs and went to war with an uninvolved country costing billions of dollars. He was ignoring the boogieman of 9/11 which he created. The tech bubble had burst, and he was helping his friends get cheap labor overseas. It seemed like the Dems could not lose as long as they did not run someone completely fucked up.

And so they had a lackluster primary with a bunch of fuckwits. john kerry came out on top. John was a truly boring candidate with no ideas and a shitty connection to the voters. His main selling point was anything but bush, which was a pretty big selling point for the left. John showed the US the problem with a campaign that is run on the problems of the incumbent. yes, there was bitter fighting over who would get there, but when the election came around John had a supposed plan he never got into details about, he could only inspire the core of the party which was going to vote no matter who ran, and Bush squeeked by.

now we have another boring MA leader who is running on an anything but the incumbent platform. he has no defined plan, he is boring as hell, he is disconnected from the people, and even in his own party he is an oddball. Just like in 2004 america is being beaten to death on a couple of issues, but it is not electrifying the party candidate slamming the incumbent. Mitt had a boost when his party rallied around him, but he is not firing america up. just like john he doesn't even fire up his own party. By the time the election comes around people are not going to want to hear about the decided obamacare, just like they didn't want to hear about the quagmire of iraq anymore. The economy and jobs will pick up as they do every year between halloween and christmas, people will feel good, and hate for the fuck ups of the incumbent will subside because people are in a better mood.

So who thinks Romney is the republican's John kerry?

So John Kerry walks into a bar.

Bartender says, "Hey John, why the long face?"

 

[JoeB131]

Naw.

Kerry is an actual American war hero that conservatives shitted on.

Romney is an actual elitist cowardly piece of shit that conservatives elevated to the status of American hero.

The only person responsible for John Kerry's problem were John Kerry.

He tried to pretend VVAW didn't happen. A lot of people had long memories.

Romney is trying to pretend AmPad didn't happen. A lot of people have long memories there, too.

 

[Oldstyle]

Let's see how many things DogStyle can get wrong!

That's AMAZINGLY stupid, Joe...Bain Capital was responsible for creating hundreds of thousands of jobs here in the US but because some of the companies that they backed financially outsourced a few jobs (most of which took place AFTER Romney had turned over control of Bain) to China you paint him as a "job outsourcer"? It's a charge that's so ridiculous that even other Democrats like Bill Clinton have been candid enough to admit that it's not a fair thing to say about Mitt Romney...but of course you've still got your whole "Mormon Phobia" thing going on so you buy into this horseshit.

Obama is trying to frame Romney in this fashion because he's scared to death of having HIS record of economic accomplishment compared to Romney's. The Obama camp's refrain is "Yes, he was successful...but only because he out sourced jobs...which is a total joke considering the man that Barry had as HIS Jobs Czar, Jeffrey Immelt outsourced far MORE jobs than Bain ever did as the CEO of General Electric.

""Bain didn't create any jobs. Romney isn't even trying to claim it did at this point. and understandably so. Most of the companies that expanded payrolls like Staples did so when they got Bain out of their lives.

Jeffrey Immelt isn't a job Czar. He hold no government position and he is not receiving a government paycheck. He isn't even a Democrat.""

You really are clueless about this topic, Joe...

"In February 2009, Immelt was appointed as a member to the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board to provide the president and his administration with advice and counsel in fixing America's economic downturn.[14] When President Obama chose to put Jeffrey Immelt at the head of the Economic Advisory Board, he felt that Immelt had attributions in knowing what would help the global economy. Obama has reported that Immelt has emerged as one of his top economic advisors in regards to trying to rebuild America's economy.[15]
On January 21, 2011, President Obama announced Immelt's appointment as chairman of his outside panel of economic advisers, succeeding former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker.[16] The New York Times reported that Obama's appointment of Immelt was "another strong signal that he intends to make the White House more business-friendly."[16] Immelt will retain his post at G.E. while becoming "chairman of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, a newly named panel that President Obama is creating by executive order."[16] Despite this, in July 2011 Immelt's General Electric announced that it is in the process of relocating its X-ray division from Wisconsin to China.[17][18] Immelt had previously referred to China as GE's "second home market".[19]"

Wikipedia

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/general-electric-paid-federal-taxes-2010/story?id=13224558

 

[JoeB131]

So you just admitted he wasn't a "Czar", then?

because that's what you claimed.

Now you are admitting Immelt was merely an "Advisor", which isn't nearly as cool as a Czar. I mean, Czars get those big furry hats.

 

[Oldstyle]

So you just admitted he wasn't a "Czar", then?

because that's what you claimed.

Now you are admitting Immelt was merely an "Advisor", which isn't nearly as cool as a Czar. I mean, Czars get those big furry hats.

Ah, Joe? Google jobs Czar and see who's name pops up over 6 million times. Jeffrey Immelt IS in fact Barack Obama's Jobs Czar.

By the way...ALL of Obama's appointed Czar's are merely "Advisors". Or didn't you grasp that concept? Immelt's the Head of the President's Economic Advisory Board. Anything else you'd like me to clear up for you?

 

[JoeB131]

So you just admitted he wasn't a "Czar", then?

because that's what you claimed.

Now you are admitting Immelt was merely an "Advisor", which isn't nearly as cool as a Czar. I mean, Czars get those big furry hats.

Ah, Joe? Google jobs Czar and see who's name pops up over 6 million times. Jeffrey Immelt IS in fact Barack Obama's Jobs Czar.

By the way...ALL of Obama's appointed Czar's are merely "Advisors". Or didn't you grasp that concept? Immelt's the Head of the President's Economic Advisory Board. Anything else you'd like me to clear up for you?

Guy, what you find in a "google" search isn't evidence.

Being part of an advisory board isn't being a "Czar" (which isn't in the official government charts, anyway.)

Like Bill Bennett was a drug Czar, but he had a title and an agency he was the head of.

For the record, I think GE's record on outsourcing is disgusting as Romney's.

But Immelt isn't running for President, is he?

 

[ConzHateUSA]

Kerry didnt flip flop on anything, he changed when the bill changed.

Kerry was a war hero and that piece of human shit karl rove managed to turn him into something else

Kinda like what they did to Max Clelland

 

[Greenbeard]

Being part of an advisory board isn't being a "Czar" (which isn't in the official government charts, anyway.)

Since it's a meaningless term, it can be whatever one likes.

The White House Social Secretary is the Party Czar!

 

[JoeB131]

Kerry didnt flip flop on anything, he changed when the bill changed.

Kerry was a war hero and that piece of human shit karl rove managed to turn him into something else

Kinda like what they did to Max Clelland

You mean actually point out what they stood for?

John Kerry got into trouble because he tried to present himself as "Mr. Warrior", when in fact, he was a dirty, stinking hippy peacenik.

If he had been honest and said something like, "I still think my principled stand against the Vietnam War was the right thing to do, but I regret that some of the protests actions were taken personally by the men who fought it."

Of course, Kerry was too arrogant to do that, and he wondered why guys who fought that war took exception to being called baby killers and being compared to Ghengis Khan.