I understand you are 'withdrawing' or have 'withdrawn' but obviously you are still reading my comments and thus knowing that you would I was merely demonstrating the 'logic' of my argument whilst pointing out your failure to grasp that logic. This is not rocket science still yet for some reason you seem unable to grasp what I am saying. You seem to want to think that by withdrawing that somehow negates the logic of my theory....nonsense. Now if you were the only one having trouble seeing what I believe is the most obvious motive for the shooter I would not bother at all...but there are many who still seem lost in a fog of coinfusion...particuarly the so called investigators and the phoney journalists who are so wrapped up in fake news they have not a clue in regards to how to proceed to get to what was the motive of the shooter....they all say...oh what a great mystery...no one will ever know blahblah They have either been told not to pressure the casinoes for the financial info of the shooter or they are so ignorant and dumb they do not know how many people have comitted suicide in vegas because of gambling losses. Even worse the local governmental figures and police spokesman who know full well what a common problem suicide is in connection with gambling losses are simply and obviously trying to protect Vegas....in other words they are engaged in a cover up....yet the media either does not want to tell that story or they just do not get it....I am sure someone eventually will....maybe it will take a tabloid to do it...the msm seems to cowed by powerful people in vegas.