Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Point 1: Really? I didn't see that on his website. Perhaps you could link to where you saw that in his platform?
Okay, it was a little hyberbolic. My point is that it's not like this is something Bill Maher pulled out of his archives from the 90s and broadcast. Santorum is the one who brought this into the discussion himself.
Point 2: No, it shows the pathetic state of the OP and that they have nothing else constructive to say, so they whine about this.
Again, Santorum is the one who brought this into the discussion. He's the one who said that sex should always be for procreation, that sex only for pleasure is bad, and that these are important policy issues, and that as President he would address these issues. He also turned around 60 seconds later and said that he's not running for Pastor, so I don't know what to beliYeve anymore when it comes out of Santorum's mouth. But the point is that he's put himself out there on this platform. It's acceptable to discuss the candidate's platform that he's professed. It's just ridiculous that it's even possible for such a candidate to exist, outside of a gag candidate.
and unless you have some actual proof that he will attempt to ban sex for pleasure because of his belief in this area, this thread and your argument are garbage.
You seem incapable of realizing there is a difference between a political platform, and a religious belief.
and unless you have some actual proof that he will attempt to ban sex for pleasure because of his belief in this area, this thread and your argument are garbage.
SANTORUM IS THE ONE WHO SAID THIS SHIT, NOT ME. What the hell does he mean that it's an important policy issue? I'm not really sure. Is he going to try to explicitly and directly ban sex that is strictly for pleasure? I don't know. Probably not. It would be impossible. But I'm very sure that he will try to throw as many hurdles in there as possible. He has no problem with banning all forms of birth control. He insists on abstinence only sex education. At the very least, he sure seems intent on making the pleasure of sex into pain, one way or another.
HE SAID THAT HE FEELS THESE ARE IMPORTANT POLICY ISSUES AND THAT HE WOULD BE THE FIRST PRESIDENT TO ADDRESS THEM. What part of that is not a political platform?You seem incapable of realizing there is a difference between a political platform, and a religious belief.
You're a freaking liar. Name the Republican who has ever banned birth control INCLUDING SANTORUM.
The only reason you libs are spamming us with this BS is you KNOW it's all you've got. You sure can't give us reasons to vote for Obama.
SANTORUM IS THE ONE WHO SAID THIS SHIT, NOT ME. What the hell does he mean that it's an important policy issue? I'm not really sure. Is he going to try to explicitly and directly ban sex that is strictly for pleasure? I don't know. Probably not. It would be impossible. But I'm very sure that he will try to throw as many hurdles in there as possible. He has no problem with banning all forms of birth control. He insists on abstinence only sex education. At the very least, he sure seems intent on making the pleasure of sex into pain, one way or another.
HE SAID THAT HE FEELS THESE ARE IMPORTANT POLICY ISSUES AND THAT HE WOULD BE THE FIRST PRESIDENT TO ADDRESS THEM. What part of that is not a political platform?
You're a freaking liar. Name the Republican who has ever banned birth control INCLUDING SANTORUM.
The only reason you libs are spamming us with this BS is you KNOW it's all you've got. You sure can't give us reasons to vote for Obama.
Dipshit.
No one claimed a republican banned birth control.
We are worried about the future and not the past. Try to keep up.
non sequitur... your facts are uncoordinatedOkay, it was a little hyberbolic. My point is that it's not like this is something Bill Maher pulled out of his archives from the 90s and broadcast. Santorum is the one who brought this into the discussion himself.
Again, Santorum is the one who brought this into the discussion. He's the one who said that sex should always be for procreation, that sex only for pleasure is bad, and that these are important policy issues, and that as President he would address these issues. He also turned around 60 seconds later and said that he's not running for Pastor, so I don't know what to beliYeve anymore when it comes out of Santorum's mouth. But the point is that he's put himself out there on this platform. It's acceptable to discuss the candidate's platform that he's professed. It's just ridiculous that it's even possible for such a candidate to exist, outside of a gag candidate.
and unless you have some actual proof that he will attempt to ban sex for pleasure because of his belief in this area, this thread and your argument are garbage.
You seem incapable of realizing there is a difference between a political platform, and a religious belief.
In the 2000 Presidential Election, Bush's official platform was "no nation building". But we knew he had a grudge against Saddam for trying to kill his father.
12 years later we are just now getting out of Iraq.
The moral of the story: Personal beliefs matter and are fair game in discussing candidates.
typical.Rachel Maddow Falsely Says Santorum Wants to Ban Contraception | LifeNews.com
I was asked if I believed in it, and I said, No, Im a Catholic, and I dont. I dont want the government to fund it through Planned Parenthood, but thats different than wanting to ban it; the idea Im coming after your birth control is absurd. I was making a statement about my moral beliefs, but I wont impose them on anyone else in this case. I dont think the government should be involved in that. People are free to make their own decisions.
The former Pennsylvania senator recently told ABCs Jake Tapper that, yes, he disagrees with Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 Supreme Court decision that struck down a ban on contraception.
He said Friday evening that its the idea that states dont have a right to pass such a law that he opposes, because he does not see the right to privacy as a constitutional right envisioned by its signers. This is hardly a new argument.
It could have been a law against buying shoestrings; that it was contraception has nothing to do with it. States have the right to pass even dumb laws.
To be clear, he does think that laws banning birth control would be dumb for a number of reasons. Birth control should be legal in the United States. The states should not ban it, and I would oppose any effort to ban it.
That bears repeating: Birth control should be legal in the United States. The states should not ban it, and I would oppose any effort to ban it.
END DUMB-ASS THREAD
In the 2000 Presidential Election, Bush's official platform was "no nation building". But we knew he had a grudge against Saddam for trying to kill his father.
12 years later we are just now getting out of Iraq.
The moral of the story: Personal beliefs matter and are fair game in discussing candidates.
You are a lying sack of shit too.
Post a link to these statements or STFU.
You are a lying sack of shit too.
Post a link to these statements or STFU.
I've already posted a video of Santorum. His voting record speaks for itself, but I'll try to see if I can pull up a few specific examples. I'll try to find the article I with him talking about states prohibiting birth control too.
You are a lying sack of shit too.
Post a link to these statements or STFU.
I've already posted a video of Santorum. His voting record speaks for itself, but I'll try to see if I can pull up a few specific examples. I'll try to find the article I with him talking about states prohibiting birth control too.
Birth control should be legal in the United States. The states should not ban it, and I would oppose any effort to ban it.
You are a lying sack of shit too.
Post a link to these statements or STFU.
I've already posted a video of Santorum. His voting record speaks for itself, but I'll try to see if I can pull up a few specific examples. I'll try to find the article I with him talking about states prohibiting birth control too.
Rick Santorum...
Birth control should be legal in the United States. The states should not ban it, and I would oppose any effort to ban it.
Still waiting libs.
Going to keep asking. Name the Republicans who have banned birth control.
You posted a six year old out of context video.
non sequitur... your facts are uncoordinatedand unless you have some actual proof that he will attempt to ban sex for pleasure because of his belief in this area, this thread and your argument are garbage.
You seem incapable of realizing there is a difference between a political platform, and a religious belief.
In the 2000 Presidential Election, Bush's official platform was "no nation building". But we knew he had a grudge against Saddam for trying to kill his father.
12 years later we are just now getting out of Iraq.
The moral of the story: Personal beliefs matter and are fair game in discussing candidates.
Duh- well up to this point Pubs have stopped the gov't from paying for birth control, which results in lhuge numbers of abortions and single mothers on welfare. GD morons, AND pack the Supreme Court with cretins against womens' right to have control over their own bodies. What incredible hypocrites. Who, us? LOL!!
Still waiting libs.
Going to keep asking. Name the Republicans who have banned birth control.
Listen you stupid brainwashed asshole. No Pub has banned it because it's ILLEGAL to ban. But they have packed the Supreme Court to change the law, and up to now have banned the gov't and insurers from paying for BC. Causing huge numbers of abortions and single women on welfare or in bad marriages.
That's about to change, DUMBASS. May your type die off. IDIOT.
That doesn't count. Only out of context videos liberals can use to foment hysteria, because they sure can't run on Obama's record.
That doesn't count. Only out of context videos liberals can use to foment hysteria, because they sure can't run on Obama's record.
Get it straight right now, fuck stick, I will be voting for this guy. I didn't vote for Obama in 2008, I won't be voting for him this year.
