1) The Constitution is in place to limit what the government does to the people. Therefore the First Amendment limits the government from establishing a mandated State or Federal Religion but has nothing to do with limiting government from imposing restrictions on itself. The founding fathers saw the example of a morally corrupt Rome and realized that a Christian government would have a greater chance of moral restraint from tyranny but also noted that a federal government with to much power would not be a good idea. Thus they left it up to the states to draft more specific constitutions with the limitations they saw fit. Again these constitutions though requiring government to recognize the Christian God were still in agreement with the First Amendment since they did not establish a mandated government on the people. If you knew your history of why the Founding Fathers came to America you would know why the Constitution says what it says, but since you do not know your history you are perfectly clueless.[/font][/color]
2) Planned Parenthood gets over $100 million dollars annually to kill babies so quit being ignorant mmmmkay? And yes it is a purly religious debate. That's what this whole friggin thread was about in case you weren't paying attention.
3) Yes it does. Religious Gays trying to destroy the sanctity of "marriage."
4) How bout this, if you can't stand hearing someone pray to themselves during their lunch break, mind your own business. And can you please provide me an instance where someone got thrown in jail for not attending church while in the army? How about if you are so offended by it you don't join?
1. The establishment clause seems to be clear in that no religion should dictate public policy. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." That extends far beyond the government merely establishing a official state religion. Yeah, many of the bill of rights protections, including the first amendments establishment clause, were not applied to the states until the 14th Amendment and then the idea of complete incorporation in the early to mid twentieth century. At this point those constitutions became unconstitutional and rightfully so. And alot of people came to america for religious freedom so long as you believed and practiced religion as they did... Puritans and many other such early american settlers were not in favor of diversity of religion.
2. We live in a secular democracy so religion shouldnt realy matter in public policy debate. Laws are made pursuant to the constitution not the bible. Our government isnt a christian government at all.
3. Heteroxeual christians have already done their part and helped to destroy the "sancity of marriage." And marriage isnt exclusive to or originally christian. So christians do not have a monopoly on the word or concept of marriage.
1) Where do you find the words Congress shall not restrict government from being Christian?
1) What does that have to do with point number 2 at all?
3) It is exclusively heterosexual. Um... What is that thingy (also known as a person) that conducts the ceremony? No ... no ... definitly not Christian.
1. congress isn't allowed to make laws with respect to religion. that includes Christianity... that means they aren't ALLOWED to create a national religion.
2. It has to do with things because we don't live in a theocracy...
3. No one "christian" performed MY wedding ceremony... and marriage is about property rights with the right to perform a marriage granted by the state. If someone chooses to have a religious ceremony (as I did, but not YOUR religion) that's their business. And whether a religious institution performs such a ceremony for a gay couple is up to them. But those "religious" determinations have no bearing on state action.