Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.


Thanks for the info. You might want to notify the SC of your ruling. They seem to disagree with parts of it.
Ask Dread Scott what he thinks about The Supreme Court and their dictating to The American People who can have and cannot have their Civil Liberties Violated by The Federal Government.
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Unmasking the targets of The Illegal Surveillance and Releasing Classified intel on the Targets of Illegal surveillance is also illegal.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.

A Secret Wiretapping Warrant is not only a violation of Due Process, it is a violation of your right to privacy. Wiretapping someone in search of a crime that cannot be named is a Political Fishing Expedition. This is the same as conducting multiple investigations where no one can name ONE single violation of US Code as the impetus for such Investigations.

Lastly and Illegal Wiretapping Warrant based on False Pretenses for Political Reasons represents Illegal Search and Seizure.
Repeating a conclusion over and over doesn't make it fact. You are just not informed enough to post on this subject.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

I'm far more informed than you are.

It takes a Village of Idiots to Raise a Democrat!
 
AN ENTIRE ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING OPERATION based on a FAKE DOSSIER funded by THE DEMOCRAT PARTY and USED AS A FAKE REASON to VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of a Candidate for the Presidency of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Trump attorney delivers point-by-point rebuttal of 'totally false' dossier

The WIRE TAPPING WARRANT GRANTED BY A SECRET EXTRA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT WAS GRANTED ON FALSE PRETENSES.

Therefore ALL EVIDENCE is Inadmissible. Let Paul Manafort Go. Mueller needs to be Fired, and Rosenstein with him. Kick McCabe to the curb as well!

KILL THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT. And let's get back to CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT!
Democrats, eh?

On May 17, 2002, the court rebuffed Attorney General John Ashcroft, releasing an opinion that alleged that the FBI and Justice Department officials had "supplied erroneous information to the court" in more than 75 applications for search warrants and wiretaps, including one signed by FBI Director Louis J. Freeh.[9] Whether this rejection was related to the court starting to require modification of significantly more requests in 2003 is unknown.

On December 16, 2005, The New York Times reported that the Bush administration had been conducting surveillance against U.S. citizens without the knowledge of the court since 2002.[10] On December 20, 2005, Judge James Robertson resigned his position with the court, apparently in protest of the secret surveillance,[11] and later, in the wake of the Snowden leaks of 2013, criticized the court-sanctioned expansion of the scope of government surveillance and its being allowed to craft a secret body of law.[12] The government's apparent circumvention of the court started prior to the increase in court-ordered modifications to warrant requests.

From United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court - Wikipedia
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.


Thanks for the info. You might want to notify the SC of your ruling. They seem to disagree with parts of it.
Ask Dread Scott what he thinks about The Supreme Court and their dictating to The American People who can have and cannot have their Civil Liberties Violated by The Federal Government.
The Supreme Court isn't infallible....no one has claimed it is. But if you feel the Supreme Court is wrong as in Dred Scott.....change the law thru an Amendment which BECOMES the law.....or gather enough evidence to convince the court as in Brown v. Board of Ed.
 
The Trump Campaign Team was ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPED by Obama Bin Spying and so was Trump Tower for 18 months before and after the election based on a FAKE DOSSIER paid for, Funded By The Democrat Party & The Clinton Campaign which was funneled to The FBI through Russian, Ukrainian and British Spies to James Comey who then leaked the Dossier to everyone else.

So Barak Obama was issued a SECRET warrant in a SECRET COURT to wiretap a rival political party, Presidential Candidate and his staff based on False Information, and a FALSE ALLEGATION of Russian Collusion, and this SECRET COURT'S sole reason for existence is to pursue foreign terrorists, other Foreign Bad actors and you Illegally use your Unconstitutional Wiretapping Authority to Wiretap a Presidential Campaign to try to INTERFERE with an ELECTION By Smearing numerous members of The Trump Campaign Team by Unmasking them and leaking classified information and it is PROVEN beyond a Shadow of a DOUBT that Barak Obama was Trying to Alter OUTCOME OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION...... Shouldn't not only whatever ticky tacky infraction you DREDGED UP while conducting your ILLEGAL ESPIONAGE on AMERICAN CITIZENS be Inadmissible, but Shouldn't BOTH THE Obama Administration & James Comey be under Investigation and FISA COURTS be DISBANDED?

My question is, again, WHY HASN'T Barak Obama, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Susan Powers, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Hillary Clinton and her staff, as well as D.W. Shultz, THE DNC, FUSION GPS, and Podesta been Subpoened and forced to testify regarding their attempts to RIG A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION and RIG THE DNC PRIMARY and why aren't they being asked to testify regarding their relationships with Pakistani Foreign Nationals (Hackers) and British, Ukrainian & Russian Spies which they colluded with to stage a soft coup by throwing an election ILLEGALLY and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY using THE GOVERNMENT as a WEAPON against a political rival?

This was a failed Coup by THE DEEP STATE and heads need to roll so this NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN!
Where is the constitutional argument that backs up your headline that FISA courts are unconstitutional? All I see is a bunch of political arguments which are irrelevant to your claim. Opinions are not legal arguments, no matter how much you click your heels together.
You have the right to face your accuser.
Secret Courts are Illegal, because they circumvent due process.
You have a right to know if you are being accused of a crime.
You also as an American Citizen have a right to privacy.
No one should be issued a wiretapping warrant based on the complaint of a losing political campaign and a FAKE DOSSIER paid for by that losing campaign.
You have the right to face your accuser in a criminal trial.....does FISA perform criminal trials?
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.

FISA does not authorize wiretaps against U.S. citizens.


Unmasking the targets of The Illegal Surveillance and Releasing Classified intel on the Targets of Illegal surveillance is also illegal.
Releasing classified material is certainly illegal, but how are you figuring unmasking is illegal?

A Secret Wiretapping Warrant is not only a violation of Due Process, it is a violation of your right to privacy. Wiretapping someone in search of a crime that cannot be named is a Political Fishing Expedition. This is the same as conducting multiple investigations where no one can name ONE single violation of US Code as the impetus for such Investigations.
FISA warrants can not be used for U.S. citizens (unless there's strong proof the person is a spy or terrorist for a foreign government), and FISA warrants are not used to investigate crimes.
 
You hacks remember how FISA was created ?? By the republicans and thier patriot act .

Guess it was fine when only being used against brown people . Now you have a problem with it?
You are correct.

W presented it to congress to combat terrorism and it sailed right through. It should NEVER have been passed in the first place.

Wrong. FISA was put into place in 1978.
 
You hacks remember how FISA was created ?? By the republicans and thier patriot act .

Guess it was fine when only being used against brown people . Now you have a problem with it?

Does it matter how the FISA came in to being? It's lived past it's usefulness and just like THE IRS it is being abused and used against THE AMERICAN PEOPLE LIKE A WEAPON!

Republicans patriot acted it into existance, and now you bitch about it being used for its intended purpose, going after foreign agents, and people working as foreign agents as a matter of national security.

Remember national security.

So many stupid people. FISA WAS ENACTED IN 1978.
 
You hacks remember how FISA was created ?? By the republicans and thier patriot act .

Guess it was fine when only being used against brown people . Now you have a problem with it?

no dim bulb. It was created in 1978 under Carter and dem congress.

And social security has remained unchanged since FDR?

Think about it. FISA changed under the patriot act to what we have today.

That's NOT what you said kid.
 
The Patriot Act was around in 1978? Under President Carter?
WTF?
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was passed in 1978. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-92/pdf/STATUTE-92-Pg1783.pdf
It goes beyond the 1978 act.

It was amended in the 2001 Patriot Act, again in 2007 under the Protect America Act, and in 2008 under the FISA Amendments Act.
So? The claim was that FISA was created by the patriot act. It wasn't.

Was the fisa court part of the original ?

Yup, the Court has ALWAYS been a part of it, but you're thinking in the wrong meaning of the word. It is a court in the sense that it listens to the application in a court like setting and decide on it's merits. There is also a separate FICA court of appeals where a declination can be appealed.
 
The Trump Campaign Team was ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPED by Obama Bin Spying and so was Trump Tower for 18 months before and after the election based on a FAKE DOSSIER paid for, Funded By The Democrat Party & The Clinton Campaign which was funneled to The FBI through Russian, Ukrainian and British Spies to James Comey who then leaked the Dossier to everyone else.

So Barak Obama was issued a SECRET warrant in a SECRET COURT to wiretap a rival political party, Presidential Candidate and his staff based on False Information, and a FALSE ALLEGATION of Russian Collusion, and this SECRET COURT'S sole reason for existence is to pursue foreign terrorists, other Foreign Bad actors and you Illegally use your Unconstitutional Wiretapping Authority to Wiretap a Presidential Campaign to try to INTERFERE with an ELECTION By Smearing numerous members of The Trump Campaign Team by Unmasking them and leaking classified information and it is PROVEN beyond a Shadow of a DOUBT that Barak Obama was Trying to Alter OUTCOME OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION...... Shouldn't not only whatever ticky tacky infraction you DREDGED UP while conducting your ILLEGAL ESPIONAGE on AMERICAN CITIZENS be Inadmissible, but Shouldn't BOTH THE Obama Administration & James Comey be under Investigation and FISA COURTS be DISBANDED?

My question is, again, WHY HASN'T Barak Obama, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Susan Powers, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Hillary Clinton and her staff, as well as D.W. Shultz, THE DNC, FUSION GPS, and Podesta been Subpoened and forced to testify regarding their attempts to RIG A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION and RIG THE DNC PRIMARY and why aren't they being asked to testify regarding their relationships with Pakistani Foreign Nationals (Hackers) and British, Ukrainian & Russian Spies which they colluded with to stage a soft coup by throwing an election ILLEGALLY and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY using THE GOVERNMENT as a WEAPON against a political rival?

This was a failed Coup by THE DEEP STATE and heads need to roll so this NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN!
Where is the constitutional argument that backs up your headline that FISA courts are unconstitutional? All I see is a bunch of political arguments which are irrelevant to your claim. Opinions are not legal arguments, no matter how much you click your heels together.
You have the right to face your accuser.
Secret Courts are Illegal, because they circumvent due process.
You have a right to know if you are being accused of a crime.
You also as an American Citizen have a right to privacy.
No one should be issued a wiretapping warrant based on the complaint of a losing political campaign and a FAKE DOSSIER paid for by that losing campaign.

Ummmm, it's not THAT kind of court.
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Unmasking the targets of The Illegal Surveillance and Releasing Classified intel on the Targets of Illegal surveillance is also illegal.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.

A Secret Wiretapping Warrant is not only a violation of Due Process, it is a violation of your right to privacy. Wiretapping someone in search of a crime that cannot be named is a Political Fishing Expedition. This is the same as conducting multiple investigations where no one can name ONE single violation of US Code as the impetus for such Investigations.

Lastly and Illegal Wiretapping Warrant based on False Pretenses for Political Reasons represents Illegal Search and Seizure.
Repeating a conclusion over and over doesn't make it fact. You are just not informed enough to post on this subject.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

I'm far more informed than you are.

It takes a Village of Idiots to Raise a Democrat!
You're so informed you think the case is "Dread" Scott. Sounds like a Mel Gibson movie.
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Unmasking the targets of The Illegal Surveillance and Releasing Classified intel on the Targets of Illegal surveillance is also illegal.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.

A Secret Wiretapping Warrant is not only a violation of Due Process, it is a violation of your right to privacy. Wiretapping someone in search of a crime that cannot be named is a Political Fishing Expedition. This is the same as conducting multiple investigations where no one can name ONE single violation of US Code as the impetus for such Investigations.

Lastly and Illegal Wiretapping Warrant based on False Pretenses for Political Reasons represents Illegal Search and Seizure.
Repeating a conclusion over and over doesn't make it fact. You are just not informed enough to post on this subject.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

I'm far more informed than you are.

It takes a Village of Idiots to Raise a Democrat!
You're so informed you think the case is "Dread" Scott. Sounds like a Mel Gibson movie.
Who cares how you spell it?

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

You understood what I meant, didn't you Village Idiot?

It takes a village of idiots to raise a Democrat.

Doosh & Douche still describes you either way.
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Unmasking the targets of The Illegal Surveillance and Releasing Classified intel on the Targets of Illegal surveillance is also illegal.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.

A Secret Wiretapping Warrant is not only a violation of Due Process, it is a violation of your right to privacy. Wiretapping someone in search of a crime that cannot be named is a Political Fishing Expedition. This is the same as conducting multiple investigations where no one can name ONE single violation of US Code as the impetus for such Investigations.

Lastly and Illegal Wiretapping Warrant based on False Pretenses for Political Reasons represents Illegal Search and Seizure.
Repeating a conclusion over and over doesn't make it fact. You are just not informed enough to post on this subject.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

I'm far more informed than you are.

It takes a Village of Idiots to Raise a Democrat!
You're so informed you think the case is "Dread" Scott. Sounds like a Mel Gibson movie.
Who cares how you spell it?

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

You understood what I meant, didn't you Village Idiot?

It takes a village of idiots to raise a Democrat.

Doosh & Douche still describes you either way.
Sorry I'm a conservative and you're the USMB equivalent of a guy with a tin foil hat and a handwritten manifesto that hangs around City Hall. No offense intended.
 
Secret Wiretapping Warrants against American Citizens are Unconstitutional.
It is also illegal for an Administration to seek a warrant under FALSE PRETENSES for political reasons based on a FAKE DOSSIER which they paid to have created, and colluded with Foreign Agents to get such a DOSSIER to the FBI through a circuitous route hoping it would not be traced back to them.

But someone ratted on the dirty son of a bitches.

Unmasking the targets of The Illegal Surveillance and Releasing Classified intel on the Targets of Illegal surveillance is also illegal.

Now they have Mueller engaged in helping deflect, cover up, and sweep it all under the rug, just like Comey was ordered to do.

A Secret Wiretapping Warrant is not only a violation of Due Process, it is a violation of your right to privacy. Wiretapping someone in search of a crime that cannot be named is a Political Fishing Expedition. This is the same as conducting multiple investigations where no one can name ONE single violation of US Code as the impetus for such Investigations.

Lastly and Illegal Wiretapping Warrant based on False Pretenses for Political Reasons represents Illegal Search and Seizure.
Repeating a conclusion over and over doesn't make it fact. You are just not informed enough to post on this subject.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

I'm far more informed than you are.

It takes a Village of Idiots to Raise a Democrat!
You're so informed you think the case is "Dread" Scott. Sounds like a Mel Gibson movie.
Who cares how you spell it?

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

You understood what I meant, didn't you Village Idiot?

It takes a village of idiots to raise a Democrat.

Doosh & Douche still describes you either way.
Sorry I'm a conservative and you're the USMB equivalent of a guy with a tin foil hat and a handwritten manifesto that hangs around City Hall. No offense intended.

Trust us, we are all SORRY YOU ARE A CONSERVATIVE TOO!

And you are a DOOSH who had to resort to "spelling smack" because you just SUCK AT THIS.

You seem more like an Agent of The Kremlin, but Dooshie McDouchburger seems to fit you just fine.
 
Repeating a conclusion over and over doesn't make it fact. You are just not informed enough to post on this subject.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

I'm far more informed than you are.

It takes a Village of Idiots to Raise a Democrat!
You're so informed you think the case is "Dread" Scott. Sounds like a Mel Gibson movie.
Who cares how you spell it?

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

You understood what I meant, didn't you Village Idiot?

It takes a village of idiots to raise a Democrat.

Doosh & Douche still describes you either way.
Sorry I'm a conservative and you're the USMB equivalent of a guy with a tin foil hat and a handwritten manifesto that hangs around City Hall. No offense intended.

Trust us, we are all SORRY YOU ARE A CONSERVATIVE TOO!

And you are a DOOSH who had to resort to "spelling smack" because you just SUCK AT THIS.

You seem more like an Agent of The Kremlin, but Dooshie McDouchburger seems to fit you just fine.
Look my fellow citizen, when you boast that you know way more about a subject than I do and misspell one of the seminal cases in USSC history IN THAT VERY SAME POST you are open to whatever grief you get. Honestly.
 
You hacks remember how FISA was created ?? By the republicans and thier patriot act .

Guess it was fine when only being used against brown people . Now you have a problem with it?

Wrong dumbass. It was put into place in 1978.

It's been amended like 4-5 times since 911! So quit acting like it's the same crap as it was in 78.
 
You hacks remember how FISA was created ?? By the republicans and thier patriot act .

Guess it was fine when only being used against brown people . Now you have a problem with it?

Wrong dumbass. It was put into place in 1978.

It's been amended like 4-5 times since 911! So quit acting like it's the same crap as it was in 78.

Look dumbass, YOU claimed the Patriot Act brought it in so shut the fuck up about being bitch slapped.
 
You hacks remember how FISA was created ?? By the republicans and thier patriot act .

Guess it was fine when only being used against brown people . Now you have a problem with it?
The FISA Court was Created in 1978 by a Democrat House, Democrat Senate and signed into law by a Democrat President.

It would have taken you 20 seconds on google to figure this out. I demand an apology for your slander regarding the GOP creating it to spy on "brown people" and that you do penitence by wearing a Keep America Great Truckers hat for two weeks.

Fisa Court Committed a Fraud upon America.

Presiding judge Rosemary Collyer, having returned from her vacation on Mars and just in time for her retirement, has demanded of the FBI revised procedures to ensure that the multiple frauds committed upon the court, including inclusion of fraudulent material, omission of exculpatory information, and the deliberate alteration of documents to mislead the court. It was farcical to hear her, in the face of multiple felonies in a Deep State plot bordering on sedition, suggest that revised procedures for the handling and submitting of FISA applications is the answer to our chief law enforcement agency's attempt to overthrow a sitting president of the United States.

Back on February 2, 2018, a House Intelligence Committee memo, written when it was chaired by the now vindicated Rep. Devin Nunes, detailed the phoniness and falsification of the data used in the first and subsequent FISA warrants based primarily on the fraudulent Steele dossier.

Nunes told how FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe admitted that without the now fully discredited Steele dossier, there would have been no FISA warrants and no subsequent Deep State coup against Trump under the guise of a counter-intelligence investigation:

The dossier, authored by former British spy Christopher Steele and commissioned by Fusion GPS, was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign through law firm Perkins Coie. It included salacious and unverified allegations about Trump's connections to Russia.

Justice is supposed to be blind, but in her case and that of the other FISA court judges, it was brain-dead. But Nunes did more than just release his damning memo. He wrote a letter to Collyer herself detailing this same information, a letter that would cause any fair-minded jurist to haul some FBI tushies into court to give good reasons why they shouldn't be arrested and charged on the spot.

Now she's shocked some two years after she was told with documented evidence that the FBI was lying to her and the 11 FISA court judges?

Where was Chief Justice John Roberts, who appoints the FISA judges and is supposedly monitoring their activities? Why they were totally oblivious to the criminal fraud that was occurring around them and before them, oblivious to the point where one could legitimately ask if their blindness was willful and purposeful.

Their actions on behalf of one political campaign colluding with a corrupt DOJ and FBI to target a political opponent is not supposed to happen in a country based on the rule of law as administered by supposedly impartial judges. Empowered to safeguard our national security against foreign actors, they essentially served as an extra-constitutional arm of the Hillary Clinton campaign as it colluded with foreign actors to stage a Deep State coup against duly elected President Donald J. Trump.

Chief Justice Roberts is the one who appoints judges to the FISA court — every last one of them, judges like Rudolph Contreras, who granted a previously denied Michael Flynn FISA warrant. His appointees are the ones who swallowed whole the contentions of the Obama administration using unverified material put together by a British agent and his Russian sources to aid one political party at the expense of another.

The abuse of FISA powers has been enormous and the damage that has been done to our republic, and our politics has been staggering.

The remedy is to impose the appropriate criminal sanctions authorized by law. Gregg Jarrett notes:

A year and a half ago when the redacted FISA applications were first made public, it was obvious that the FBI relied almost entirely on Christopher Steele's phony "dossier" and that the FISA court was being lied to. Back then, Collyer should have immediately ordered a "show cause contempt" hearing demanding that Comey, Sally Yates, Andrew McCabe, Dana Boente and Rod Rosenstein all appear before the court to explain why they should not be held in criminal contempt for deceiving judges in the four warrant applications they signed. They swore that the information was true and verified when they knew or should have known it was not. Collyer still isn't ordering a contempt hearing. This is an appalling abdication of judicial duty.

Imprisonment and/or disbarment for the lot of them is required. After that, abolish the FISA court itself. It is an unelected fourth branch of government with no real accountability. We have sacrificed our liberty for its bogus promise of security, putting our democracy at risk. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and we see that happening before our very eyes.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...itted_a_fraud_upon_america.html#ixzz6G1JwNfxf
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top