CDZ Is it possible to circumvent political hero worship?

jwoodie

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2012
19,341
8,103
940
Of course some of it is situationally convenient (e.g., eulogizing McCain because of his opposition to Trump), but the larger issue of worshiping one candidate while demonizing another candidate is an increasingly dangerous trend in American politics. I fear we are heading towards a coup by one side or the other.

What say you?
 
I don't know of any politicians who are "worshipped" or even held in very high esteem.

There are a few who are conspicuously ethical, but few take notice.

Even Trump's most ardent supporters don't claim he is "good," or "brilliant," or personally exemplary. We just like what he is doing. Bernie Sanders seems to get a lot of personal admiration, but that is from idiots who have never had a job. And I don't think they are dangerous.
 
DANGEROUS TREND in America . Is it off topic for me to say that i think that the most worrisome trend are Government men and official , authorities [same as kings men of old] that perform DAY to Day Government functions in the USA Society . ------------------- if off topic i apologize .
 
Of course some of it is situationally convenient (e.g., eulogizing McCain because of his opposition to Trump), but the larger issue of worshiping one candidate while demonizing another candidate is an increasingly dangerous trend in American politics. I fear we are heading towards a coup by one side or the other.

What say you?

This is one heck of a problem. I will include team worship in it also.
 
The two party system we have is the fundamental problem. We have essentially turned politics into team sports only it's worse because the consequences of losing are far more insidious (at least in your mind) than losing a game. I don't see a coup coming, overall we are too comfortable in America to do anything rash.

I think Obama might be the only candidate in recent history that approached 'worship' status by at least some of his followers. But in terms of demonization, we need look no further than President Trump for the prime example. And yes that is very unhealthy for the country.
 
The two party system we have is the fundamental problem. We have essentially turned politics into team sports only it's worse because the consequences of losing are far more insidious (at least in your mind) than losing a game. I don't see a coup coming, overall we are too comfortable in America to do anything rash.

I think Obama might be the only candidate in recent history that approached 'worship' status by at least some of his followers. But in terms of demonization, we need look no further than President Trump for the prime example. And yes that is very unhealthy for the country.

I don't disagree about Trump at all.

Let me be the first to say I think Trump is childish and generally don't like him BUT he did great meeting with North Korea and I like tariffs.
 
The two party system we have is the fundamental problem.
While I agree that it is a serious flaw in current politics, I think it goes beyond that. It would seem to me that the "two party system worked for quite a while. Sure, there were bumps in the road, some pot holes too (ok some were mountains, while others were sinkholes, LOL), but we navigated it ok as a country. Where we seem to have gone off the rails here is with "Postmodernism".
From Wiki: "While encompassing a wide variety of approaches, postmodernism is generally defined by an attitude of skepticism, irony, or rejection toward the meta-narratives and ideologies of modernism, often calling into question various assumptions of Enlightenment rationality.[5] Consequently, common targets of postmodern critique include universalist notions of objective reality, morality, truth, human nature, reason, language, and social progress.[5] Postmodern thinkers frequently call attention to the contingent or socially-conditioned nature of knowledge claims and value systems, situating them as products of particular political, historical, or cultural discourses and hierarchies.[5] Accordingly, postmodern thought is broadly characterized by tendencies to self-referentiality, epistemological and moral relativism, pluralism, subjectivism, and irreverence."
A general summary that I believe is pretty accurate. Notice the part about calling into question objective reality? That is the at the core. There is no reality other than that which I experience. Your reality is irrelevant to me because it is not mine. Hence 2+2 can, indeed, equal something other than 4, if I can explain it. Further, my explanation need not be rational, as objective rationality is also called into question.
See the problem here? I'll spell it out for those who do not.
Nothing is real, nothing I say needs to make sense to anyone but me, morality is relative, human nature is a social construct, and I don't need to have a rationale for my position on a given topic. How can we base a society on THAT? Simple, we can't. That is the point. Chaos, anarchy, mob rule, and a complete departure from all aspects of "western" social norms.

As a country, we can, as history has shown, survive (and even thrive) under a "two party system" of governance. We cannot, by definition (and design) survive, let alone thrive, under Postmodernism, as it relates to politics, and philosophy.

That, in a nutshell, is where we are at right now. A fork in the road, if you will. We must, as a society, choose between the status quo (or something similar to it), and Postmodernism. Will we survive as a country, or devolve into chaos?

The only question each of us have to answer for ourselves is:

Will you go over the cliff with the rest of humanity, or will you be one of those trying to convince others to stop before it's too late?
 
Of course some of it is situationally convenient (e.g., eulogizing McCain because of his opposition to Trump), but the larger issue of worshiping one candidate while demonizing another candidate is an increasingly dangerous trend in American politics. I fear we are heading towards a coup by one side or the other.

What say you?

McCain isn’t being worshiped. He is being remembered because he didn’t toe the party line as often as many of his contemporaries are. You remember the exceptions; not the rule. I didn’t always or even often agree with McCain but I did respect him. I did agree with him about nuclear power; we’ve had ships at sea running on Nuke power for something like 40 years and the safety rate is to say the very least; exceptional. We could duplicate that on land and solve some large energy challenges but liberals who won’t even hear the argument (primarily liberals) are standing in the way.

At any rate; he’s not being worshiped. His feud with the blob is causing him to get outsized headlines; that much is true.
 
Of course some of it is situationally convenient (e.g., eulogizing McCain because of his opposition to Trump), but the larger issue of worshiping one candidate while demonizing another candidate is an increasingly dangerous trend in American politics. I fear we are heading towards a coup by one side or the other.

What say you?
The divisions in this country are real, profound and increasing. They're so bad at this point that yeah, I have no doubt that if one "side" had the ability to complete a coup it would probably try. That's how far we've fallen.

There is now even evidence that our divisions are so deep that they have an effect on the economy: Partisanship’s a Helluva Drug — And It’s Reshaping the Economy

The worst part of this is that we're choosing to behave this way. Those who have a vested professional interest in keeping us angry and divided are winning, and that's because we're choosing to hand the victory to them. This is a self-inflicted wound.
.
 
Last edited:
I don't know of any politicians who are "worshipped" or even held in very high esteem.

There are a few who are conspicuously ethical, but few take notice.

Even Trump's most ardent supporters don't claim he is "good," or "brilliant," or personally exemplary. We just like what he is doing. Bernie Sanders seems to get a lot of personal admiration, but that is from idiots who have never had a job. And I don't think they are dangerous.
This guy is in denial...celebrities were literally introducing Obama as “lord and savior”, and the media was just out there pushing the only scandal Obama had was wearing a tan suit...are you crazy? Ardent trump supporters are no better. It’s one thing to like the good things you think he does, but that is zero excuse to ignore the blatantly terrible stuff he does. Take for instance this whole McCain thing, is he seriously that freaking petty that he’s still publically displaying his grudge against a senator who just died. A senator who is indeed a war hero, like his policy or stance against trump or not. He refused to be used as a bargaining chip for the north Vietnamese, and opted to stay with the other POW’s for another couple of years. Show a guy and his family some dignity after his death. What he said about Putin and Russia a couple of weeks ago, Jesus, how inept can you be? Outlawing turning, whose he trying to get to vote, the mob? NO-ONE agreed with that policy, yet trump supporters are silent. You should be able to criticize him for the stupid stuff he does, and he needs that. Or he’s going to keep making stupid comments like this, and we’ll see a completely inept Democratic candidate beat him in 2020 .
 
My experience is that almost everyone who worships a politician (or anyone else they have never met) is either stupid and/or emotionally disturbed.

Donald Trump Supporters Mostly Uneducated, New Poll Finds
Average IQ of university students is around 115 IQ points - read more.

And since most Trumpbots are uneducated and the higher your education level (generally) the higher IQ you have...this clearly explains the staggeringly ignorant and gullible actions of most Trumpbots.

I guess reading up on Hitler's speeches helped Trump con the ignorant masses after all.

Donald Trump's ex-wife once said Trump kept a book of Hitler's speeches by his bed
 

Forum List

Back
Top