So if you dont own a Mac then you have been marketed to and fallen for it. Its ok because most of the things we do is guided by marketing. The PC is one of the biggest examples of marketing there is. There are other cheaper and better OS's out there than Windows. Bill Gates just happened to be the one that marketed his stuff better. Your job helped with the marketing by providing you with a PC at work instead of a more efficient system. They didnt have to say a word. They just let you develop the habit of using one instead of another system. The best marketing acts on you at a subconscious level. You dont feel as if someone twisted your arm. They just told you what you wanted to hear and gave you the illusion you made the decision on your own. If you have your own personal tracking device you that you pay for then thats another example of marketing.Why did you want one? Yes it is based on what some company tells you should have. Let me guess. You have a Mac?
I can lay blame at the companies feet as well because I know what they do to create a habit or addition on purpose with their product. Think about the great example of the cigarette companies. They are not the only ones that do this.
I had decided to own a computer because I liked using one at work. No, I don't own a Mac. When I opted to buy one the first time, truth is I went with the cheapest one. No company ever told me I should have one back then. Plenty of commercials now try to tell me I need this or that. So far, no effect. I was never one to try and keep up with the Jones' like many people. I think that seeing other people with stuff is the biggest reason some people opt to buy new stuff.
I was interested from the start in computers and thought they were awesome. I like technology, though never got into video games. Somehow, the multitude of commercials couldn't convince me that I should buy one. I have had the same vehicle for nearly 20 years. All those commercials for the latest fancy models have not gotten me into a dealer even though I could trade my current vehicle in for a new one. Even friends suggest that it's time for a new one. Sorry, I do what I like.
I use my computer for work to this day. It's a good thing to have and no one twisted my arm. Just like no one has to convince me that I should buy a winter coat, cat food, eggs or toilet paper. Some things you need and you find the best deal. Commercials aren't likely to direct you to the best deal and should be ignored. Doing your own homework is always the way to go.
Not everyone is totally controlled but you better believe everyone is affected and controlled to some extent by marketing.
The PC I bought is totally different than the one at work. Knock it off with the stuff about everyone being tricked by companies. We make decisions on what we want to buy. Period. I chose my own computer the same way I choose what to eat. I do things in my own best interest.
I feel you are attempting to push the notion that we are all controlled by big companies and are helpless to fight against them. It's bull. People don't have to eat unhealthy foods. They choose to do so against their own best interests.
That's not quite true. If you're talking about tobacco, yes. Food: not so much. Between HFCS, buggered wheat, Frankenfoods and various chemical additives including hidden names, knowledge of what choice one is making is far beyond most people's ken and always a game of catch-up. And that's only for what's on the grocery shelf; it makes eating in a restaurant a complete crapshoot. When I buy a tomato, I reasonably presume that it's an actual tomato and not some hack scientist's lab experiment. When I buy milk, I reasonably presume that it's milk, and not a glass of cattle hormones and antibiotics. That's an entirely reasonable expectation.
Marketing is good as far as letting people know what is out there. It certainly isn't a crime, but I don't buy that people are doing things against their will. Maybe it's easy to trick some people, but they are letting themselves be taken advantage of in most cases.
Now you're blaming the victim.
No, it's not my responsibility as a consumer to think ahead of every insidious deception that a processed food company might think of in order to outsmart them. They have teams of specialists to achieve that deception; I just want to eat. Guess who's got the advantage there.
Marketing doesn't need to "let people know what's out there", and you're contradicting your earlier sentiment. Me, I think like you did three posts ago: when I decide I need something, I do the research myself. I don't need a marketer to try to convince me I need it.
Obamacare did big time marketing both before and after it was passed, didn't it? And those ads contained a great many lies. I guess that is the best example of people being fooled by ads. I sure hope they learn their lesson.
Here you're contradicting yourself again. Is the message recipient at fault, or not? Pick a side.
Meanwhile, it is a concern that some on the left are trying to use media to convince people that they have no control over their lives and they must rely on government to fix them. No personal responsibility, no blaming yourselves, just bad companies conning people into eating poorly and getting fat. Only government can possibly fix this.
No idea what you're talking about at this point...