Is increasing population a primary component of Dem platforms..Does that improve the quality of life

[BrokeLoser]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

 

[playtime]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

 

[BluesLegend]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

 

[ReinyDays]

No ... legalized abortion is a primary component of the Democrat platform ...

 

[playtime]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

tell that to donny who wants to build his wall where wildlife will be harmed, across private property & how he's rolling EPA regs back to pre nixon days.

 

[bripat9643]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Dims support unlimited immigration. Republicans don't.

 

[bripat9643]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

tell that to donny who wants to build his wall where wildlife will be harmed, across private property & how he's rolling EPA regs back to pre nixon days.

Yeah, I'm sure harming wildlife is your primary concern about building the wall. <snicker>

Who do you think your fooling? Trump is rolling back regulations to the Obama days.

 

[playtime]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Dims support unlimited immigration. Republicans don't.

fake news.

 

[night_son]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

The "threat" or danger of "over" population is a myth touted and believed only by those who live in mega cities. Just take a drive through the countryside sometime if you don't believe me. There are millions upon millions of acres of undeveloped rural areas in our United States. Who does population increase benefit? The human race.

 

[bripat9643]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Dims support unlimited immigration. Republicans don't.

fake news.

Not at all.

Name one Dim proposal what would actually reduce immigration.

 

[playtime]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

tell that to donny who wants to build his wall where wildlife will be harmed, across private property & how he's rolling EPA regs back to pre nixon days.

Yeah, I'm sure harming wildlife is your primary concern about building the law. <snicker>

Who do you think your fooling? Trump is rolling back regulations to the Obama days.

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight
By ELLEN KNICKMEYERJanuary 9, 2020 GMT
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a dramatic rollback of environmental oversight, President Donald Trump took action Thursday to clear the way and speed up development of a wide range of commercial projects by cutting back federal review of their impact on the environment.

“The United States can’t compete and prosper if a bureaucratic system holds us back from building what we need,” Trump said at the White House in announcing the proposed regulatory rollback, surrounded by Cabinet secretaries, industry leaders and workers in hard hats.

Trump’s proposal calls for greatly narrowing the scope of the half-century-old National Environmental Policy Act, signed by Republican President Richard Nixon in 1970. It was one of the first of that era’s fundamental environmental laws, along with the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, that spelled out the country’s principal protections.

That National Environmental Policy Act required federal agencies to consider whether a project would harm the air, land, water or wildlife. It also gave the public, including people living in the neighborhood around a proposed dam, pipeline or other big project, the right of review and input. Congress said at the time that the nation was moving to “fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations.″

Trump, who has targeted environmental rules in his drive to ease the way for business, said Thursday that enforcement of the law had slowed federal approval of projects. “America’s most critical infrastructure projects have been tied up and bogged down by an outrageously slow and burdensome federal approval process,″ he said. “The builders are not happy. Nobody’s happy.″

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs
By Rebecca Beitsch and Rachel Frazin - 02/10/20 02:18 PM EST

Trump’s budget would eliminate 50 EPA programs and impose massive cuts to research and development, while also nixing money for the Energy Star rating system. The Energy Star program, which measures the efficiency of electronics and appliances, would instead rely on businesses to pay a fee to participate in the program.



At the EPA, the Trump budget would cut the Superfund program, tasked with cleaning up hazardous waste sites, by 10 percent, despite data showing the agency has the largest backlog of toxic waste cleanups in 15 years.

The proposal would cut funding for a number of waterway protection projects in blue states like Maryland, New York and Washington. Projects in swing states like the Great Lakes region and Florida's Everglades would be fully funded.

The EPA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Among the 50 programs targeted by the administration are ones that help fight pollution, radon, lead, as well as those that give clean water grants to small and disadvantaged communities.

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs

 

[playtime]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Dims support unlimited immigration. Republicans don't.

fake news.

Not at all.

Name one Dim proposal what would actually reduce immigration.

any reforms that were bipartisan have been shelved by the (R) majority in the past.

 

[bripat9643]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

tell that to donny who wants to build his wall where wildlife will be harmed, across private property & how he's rolling EPA regs back to pre nixon days.

Yeah, I'm sure harming wildlife is your primary concern about building the law. <snicker>

Who do you think your fooling? Trump is rolling back regulations to the Obama days.

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight
By ELLEN KNICKMEYERJanuary 9, 2020 GMT
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a dramatic rollback of environmental oversight, President Donald Trump took action Thursday to clear the way and speed up development of a wide range of commercial projects by cutting back federal review of their impact on the environment.

“The United States can’t compete and prosper if a bureaucratic system holds us back from building what we need,” Trump said at the White House in announcing the proposed regulatory rollback, surrounded by Cabinet secretaries, industry leaders and workers in hard hats.

Trump’s proposal calls for greatly narrowing the scope of the half-century-old National Environmental Policy Act, signed by Republican President Richard Nixon in 1970. It was one of the first of that era’s fundamental environmental laws, along with the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, that spelled out the country’s principal protections.

That National Environmental Policy Act required federal agencies to consider whether a project would harm the air, land, water or wildlife. It also gave the public, including people living in the neighborhood around a proposed dam, pipeline or other big project, the right of review and input. Congress said at the time that the nation was moving to “fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations.″

Trump, who has targeted environmental rules in his drive to ease the way for business, said Thursday that enforcement of the law had slowed federal approval of projects. “America’s most critical infrastructure projects have been tied up and bogged down by an outrageously slow and burdensome federal approval process,″ he said. “The builders are not happy. Nobody’s happy.″

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs
By Rebecca Beitsch and Rachel Frazin - 02/10/20 02:18 PM EST

Trump’s budget would eliminate 50 EPA programs and impose massive cuts to research and development, while also nixing money for the Energy Star rating system. The Energy Star program, which measures the efficiency of electronics and appliances, would instead rely on businesses to pay a fee to participate in the program.



At the EPA, the Trump budget would cut the Superfund program, tasked with cleaning up hazardous waste sites, by 10 percent, despite data showing the agency has the largest backlog of toxic waste cleanups in 15 years.

The proposal would cut funding for a number of waterway protection projects in blue states like Maryland, New York and Washington. Projects in swing states like the Great Lakes region and Florida's Everglades would be fully funded.

The EPA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Among the 50 programs targeted by the administration are ones that help fight pollution, radon, lead, as well as those that give clean water grants to small and disadvantaged communities.

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs

Blah blah blah. You failed to prove he is rolling back regulations to be the same as they were during the Nixon era. Any time any regulations are rolled back, a flock of TDS morons start bleating that it's the end of the world. It never is.

 

[bripat9643]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Dims support unlimited immigration. Republicans don't.

fake news.

Not at all.

Name one Dim proposal what would actually reduce immigration.

any reforms that were bipartisan have been shelved by the (R) majority in the past.

Whenever anything is described by politicians and the press as "bipartisan," it means Americans are getting it up the ass in the worst way possible.

 

[playtime]

(D)s are in favor of mandated health ins coverage for birth control & (R)s are not.

(D)s are in favor of choosing whether to become a parent. (R)s are not.

easy answer.

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

tell that to donny who wants to build his wall where wildlife will be harmed, across private property & how he's rolling EPA regs back to pre nixon days.

Yeah, I'm sure harming wildlife is your primary concern about building the law. <snicker>

Who do you think your fooling? Trump is rolling back regulations to the Obama days.

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight
By ELLEN KNICKMEYERJanuary 9, 2020 GMT
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a dramatic rollback of environmental oversight, President Donald Trump took action Thursday to clear the way and speed up development of a wide range of commercial projects by cutting back federal review of their impact on the environment.

“The United States can’t compete and prosper if a bureaucratic system holds us back from building what we need,” Trump said at the White House in announcing the proposed regulatory rollback, surrounded by Cabinet secretaries, industry leaders and workers in hard hats.

Trump’s proposal calls for greatly narrowing the scope of the half-century-old National Environmental Policy Act, signed by Republican President Richard Nixon in 1970. It was one of the first of that era’s fundamental environmental laws, along with the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, that spelled out the country’s principal protections.

That National Environmental Policy Act required federal agencies to consider whether a project would harm the air, land, water or wildlife. It also gave the public, including people living in the neighborhood around a proposed dam, pipeline or other big project, the right of review and input. Congress said at the time that the nation was moving to “fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations.″

Trump, who has targeted environmental rules in his drive to ease the way for business, said Thursday that enforcement of the law had slowed federal approval of projects. “America’s most critical infrastructure projects have been tied up and bogged down by an outrageously slow and burdensome federal approval process,″ he said. “The builders are not happy. Nobody’s happy.″

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs
By Rebecca Beitsch and Rachel Frazin - 02/10/20 02:18 PM EST

Trump’s budget would eliminate 50 EPA programs and impose massive cuts to research and development, while also nixing money for the Energy Star rating system. The Energy Star program, which measures the efficiency of electronics and appliances, would instead rely on businesses to pay a fee to participate in the program.



At the EPA, the Trump budget would cut the Superfund program, tasked with cleaning up hazardous waste sites, by 10 percent, despite data showing the agency has the largest backlog of toxic waste cleanups in 15 years.

The proposal would cut funding for a number of waterway protection projects in blue states like Maryland, New York and Washington. Projects in swing states like the Great Lakes region and Florida's Everglades would be fully funded.

The EPA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Among the 50 programs targeted by the administration are ones that help fight pollution, radon, lead, as well as those that give clean water grants to small and disadvantaged communities.

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs

Blah blah blah. You failed to prove he is rolling back regulations to be the same as they were during the Nixon era. Any time any regulations are rolled back, a flock of TDS morons start bleating that it's the end of the world. It never is.

apparently you don't have problems with slurry in the water or arsenic or mercury...

The latest target is the National Environmental Policy Act, a 1970 law that requires federal agencies to consider the environmental impact of projects. President Trump wants to impose new deadlines on such studies and also narrow the range of what could be considered. Supporters of his proposal say it would reduce unnecessary delay. Critics say he’s launched an all-out campaign against environmental regulation, targeting at least 50 significant rules.

Exactly 50 years later, that law – the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) – is under attack. The Trump administration last week announced proposed reforms to the act that would significantly reduce its scope. It’s the latest move in an unprecedented effort to roll back not only recent Obama-era environmental regulations but also some of the bedrock laws that have shaped federal environment policy since the 1970s.

Trump takes on 50 years of environmental regulations, one by one

 

[bripat9643]

Have you looked at the filthy Dem run garbage, pollution, sewage spewing cities where Dems pack em in like sardines? You people are a cancer tumor on the planet. You don't damage the environment, you obliterate it with concrete and blacktop. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw untreated sewage into public waterways.

tell that to donny who wants to build his wall where wildlife will be harmed, across private property & how he's rolling EPA regs back to pre nixon days.

Yeah, I'm sure harming wildlife is your primary concern about building the law. <snicker>

Who do you think your fooling? Trump is rolling back regulations to the Obama days.

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight
By ELLEN KNICKMEYERJanuary 9, 2020 GMT
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a dramatic rollback of environmental oversight, President Donald Trump took action Thursday to clear the way and speed up development of a wide range of commercial projects by cutting back federal review of their impact on the environment.

“The United States can’t compete and prosper if a bureaucratic system holds us back from building what we need,” Trump said at the White House in announcing the proposed regulatory rollback, surrounded by Cabinet secretaries, industry leaders and workers in hard hats.

Trump’s proposal calls for greatly narrowing the scope of the half-century-old National Environmental Policy Act, signed by Republican President Richard Nixon in 1970. It was one of the first of that era’s fundamental environmental laws, along with the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, that spelled out the country’s principal protections.

That National Environmental Policy Act required federal agencies to consider whether a project would harm the air, land, water or wildlife. It also gave the public, including people living in the neighborhood around a proposed dam, pipeline or other big project, the right of review and input. Congress said at the time that the nation was moving to “fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations.″

Trump, who has targeted environmental rules in his drive to ease the way for business, said Thursday that enforcement of the law had slowed federal approval of projects. “America’s most critical infrastructure projects have been tied up and bogged down by an outrageously slow and burdensome federal approval process,″ he said. “The builders are not happy. Nobody’s happy.″

Trump proposes sweeping rollback of environmental oversight

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs
By Rebecca Beitsch and Rachel Frazin - 02/10/20 02:18 PM EST

Trump’s budget would eliminate 50 EPA programs and impose massive cuts to research and development, while also nixing money for the Energy Star rating system. The Energy Star program, which measures the efficiency of electronics and appliances, would instead rely on businesses to pay a fee to participate in the program.



At the EPA, the Trump budget would cut the Superfund program, tasked with cleaning up hazardous waste sites, by 10 percent, despite data showing the agency has the largest backlog of toxic waste cleanups in 15 years.

The proposal would cut funding for a number of waterway protection projects in blue states like Maryland, New York and Washington. Projects in swing states like the Great Lakes region and Florida's Everglades would be fully funded.

The EPA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Among the 50 programs targeted by the administration are ones that help fight pollution, radon, lead, as well as those that give clean water grants to small and disadvantaged communities.

Trump budget slashes EPA funding, environmental programs

Blah blah blah. You failed to prove he is rolling back regulations to be the same as they were during the Nixon era. Any time any regulations are rolled back, a flock of TDS morons start bleating that it's the end of the world. It never is.

apparently you don't have problems with slurry in the water or arsenic or mercury...

The latest target is the National Environmental Policy Act, a 1970 law that requires federal agencies to consider the environmental impact of projects. President Trump wants to impose new deadlines on such studies and also narrow the range of what could be considered. Supporters of his proposal say it would reduce unnecessary delay. Critics say he’s launched an all-out campaign against environmental regulation, targeting at least 50 significant rules.

Exactly 50 years later, that law – the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) – is under attack. The Trump administration last week announced proposed reforms to the act that would significantly reduce its scope. It’s the latest move in an unprecedented effort to roll back not only recent Obama-era environmental regulations but also some of the bedrock laws that have shaped federal environment policy since the 1970s.

Trump takes on 50 years of environmental regulations, one by one

That policy drastically lengthens the time required to get projects approved and costs the economy hundreds of billions of dollars every year. it needs to be reformed. It needs to be reigned in. Anyone who claims otherwise is simply a leftist douchebag.

 

[Unkotare]

Now, dangers of a population implosion

 

[Rye Catcher]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

I suppose you need to define who are "good, real Americans".

I will offer my opinion on what defines a "good, real American" below:

• S/He judges people by their character, not their color / ethnicity or sexual orientation
• S/He respects the laws and the American Tradition of Jurisprudence - no one is above the law and no one should be judged guilty until a trier of facts finds evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
• S/He who supports and defends the Constitution in total, including the vision left to us by the framers as outlined in the Preamble
• S/He support aid and comfort for the needy: the aged, infirm and children
• S/He who supports Public Schools whether they have students enrolled or not, for they are the future
• All those who support equal rights and equal opportunities for every citizen
• None of those who are liars, cheats and violent criminals, those who do not support the traditional values, mores and ethics Americans have always articulated and too many ignore.

 

[konradv]

for good, real Americans? Who benefits from population expansion?

Population expansion? Weren't Dems/Libs being accused of wanting the population to decrease to save the environment? Which is it or is this just part of an argument salad to see what sticks?

 

[bripat9643]

for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?

I suppose you need to define who are "good, real Americans".

I will offer my opinion on what defines a "good, real American" below:

• S/He judges people by their character, not their color / ethnicity or sexual orientation
• S/He respects the laws and the American Tradition of Jurisprudence - no one is above the law and no one should be judged guilty until a trier of facts finds evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
• S/He who supports and defends the Constitution in total, including the vision left to us by the framers as outlined in the Preamble
• S/He support aid and comfort for the needy: the aged, infirm and children
• S/He who supports Public Schools whether they have students enrolled or not, for they are the future
• All those who support equal rights and equal opportunities for every citizen
• None of those who are liars, cheats and violent criminals, those who do not support the traditional values, mores and ethics Americans have always articulated and too many ignore.

It's hilarious that you believe you have described a typical liberal or a "real American."

I'll be more plain: How does any American benefit from immigration?