Much has been made of human "destruction" of the environment, but it seems to me that this begs the question of whether or not human development is simply part of a natural evolutionary process. If it is, why should humans be blamed for environmental changes more that any other life forms or geological disturbances?
If not, doesn't this presuppose that humans possess some supernatural traits that confer a special responsibility for Earth stewardship that is not shared by anyone or anything else? If they do, how were they assigned this special responsibility?
My point is that placing moral blame on humans for their actions is a tacit admission that they were created for some moral purpose. Isn't it inconsistent to claim that humans are simply the result of random genetic mutations but then claim that their development is not part of the natural order?
If not, doesn't this presuppose that humans possess some supernatural traits that confer a special responsibility for Earth stewardship that is not shared by anyone or anything else? If they do, how were they assigned this special responsibility?
My point is that placing moral blame on humans for their actions is a tacit admission that they were created for some moral purpose. Isn't it inconsistent to claim that humans are simply the result of random genetic mutations but then claim that their development is not part of the natural order?