Is Global warming a Hoax?

[amrchaos]

I am looking for information regarding the scientists that collect data on Global climate temperatures. Is it true? Did they "FIX" the data? Why would they do something as stupid as that? Or is this an attack by the Right wing due to the undesirable effects of rampant regulations would cause to economic growth?

Is it real--Or is it fake?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o83XMMl9Yzc&feature=channel[/ame]

 

[VaYank5150]

I am looking for information regarding the scientists that collect data on Global climate temperatures. Is it true? Did they "FIX" the data? Why would they do something as stupid as that? Or is this an attack by the Right wing due to the undesirable effects of rampant regulations would cause to economic growth?

Is it real--Or is it fake?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o83XMMl9Yzc&feature=channel

Answer: D) All of the above.

 

[Truthmatters]

The emails were stolen.

The investigation has just begun.

In the end I think you will see some people go to jail for stealing private information and the data will hold firm.

 

[Zander]

It is a scam. A hoax perpetrated for money and for power.

People need to 'believe in' something. For secular humanists who have rejected religiosity, the new religion of today is "Earth" and "global warming". Ironically, they've returned to paganism!

The facts are out now, the data was faked. The AGW debate relied upon a shaky correlation argument to begin with and now that myth has now been destroyed. There is no correlation and there never was any causation! Yet sadly, those who stand to profit from the hoax along with and their fervent minions, continue to defend AGW in the face of reality.

In the end, the truth will win. The data was faked. It was a hoax.

 

[Claudette]

You wish.

If the e-mails are to be believed they fudged it all to go along with their GW ideas. They also purged all the real data so now there is no way to study anything. You have half the scientists who say GW is real and the other half who don't and with no TRUE data to study, how the hell do you draw any conclusions???

 

[PoliticalChic]

The emails were stolen.

The investigation has just begun.

In the end I think you will see some people go to jail for stealing private information and the data will hold firm.

Dear Diary,

I'm so happy to be in the midst of global warming, but some folks will have some

adjusting to do!

I feel that I have to do something to help, so I’m sending a contribution to

“Air Conditioners for Inuits,” and I hope everyone’ll do the same.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am looking for information regarding the scientists that collect data on Global climate temperatures. Is it true? Did they "FIX" the data? Why would they do something as stupid as that? Or is this an attack by the Right wing due to the undesirable effects of rampant regulations would cause to economic growth?

Is it real--Or is it fake?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o83XMMl9Yzc&feature=channel

• A series of emails shows how Professor Philip Jones, head of the CRU, and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws; scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offence.

• Other emails show how the scientists manipulate data through their tortuous computer programs, always to point in only the one desired direction -- to lower past temperatures and to "adjust" recent temperatures upwards, in order to convey the impression of an accelerated warming.

• Lastly, the emails demonstrate the ruthless way in which these academics have been determined to silence any expert questioning of the findings they have arrived at by such dubious methods -- not just by refusing to disclose their basic data but by discrediting and freezing out any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics' work.

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation - Telegraph

 

[Zoom-boing]

It is a scam. A hoax perpetrated for money and for power.

People need to 'believe in' something. For secular humanists who have rejected religiosity, the new religion of today is "Earth" and "global warming". Ironically, they've returned to paganism!

The facts are out now, the data was faked. The AGW debate relied upon a shaky correlation argument to begin with and now that myth has now been destroyed. There is no correlation and there never was any causation! Yet sadly, those who stand to profit from the hoax along with and their fervent minions, continue to defend AGW in the face of reality.

In the end, the truth will win. The data was faked. It was a hoax.

Yup, that's it in a nutshell. Well said.

 

[Ravi]

It is a scam. A hoax perpetrated for money and for power.

People need to 'believe in' something. For secular humanists who have rejected religiosity, the new religion of today is "Earth" and "global warming". Ironically, they've returned to paganism!

The facts are out now, the data was faked. The AGW debate relied upon a shaky correlation argument to begin with and now that myth has now been destroyed. There is no correlation and there never was any causation! Yet sadly, those who stand to profit from the hoax along with and their fervent minions, continue to defend AGW in the face of reality.

In the end, the truth will win. The data was faked. It was a hoax.

None of what you've posted is fact. You are just as bad as those you accuse.

 

[Jay Canuck]

of course there is a mass conspiracy among the vast majority of the worlds scientists to deceive the public at large...... and the proof of this is the implications of less than 15 people?

 

[Zander]

of course there is a mass conspiracy among the vast majority of the worlds scientists to deceive the public at large...... and the proof of this is the implications of less than 15 people?

It is a religion and a business.

 

[nodoginnafight]

The best scientific evidence very strongly suggests (but cannot prove without any shadow of a doubt) that climate change is real and that human activity is contributing.
In spite of an attempt to create the illusion of a lack of consensus among the scientific community - an overwhelming consensus (in fact NO peer-reviewed work has refuted the premise of Anthropogenic climate change) has emerged.

Does it mean that it is impossible that they are all wrong? Nope - it is possible they are wrong.

As to a vast conspiracy among the world's scientific community to perpetuate a hoax - absurd. WAAAY TOO MANY people would have to be involved with not a single one EVER "coming clean." Also, when have people from all over the globe ever been able to agree to secretly participate in something like this. Too absurd for serious consideration.

AND the profit motive would support denying climate change far more than it would support accepting it.

The absolute best information available and the overwhelming consensus of the scientific community supports the premise that our climate is changing and that human activity is contributing to that change (although the extent to which human activity is contributing is certainly not agreed upon).

So there are the simple facts. Twist, spin, hurl faux science as your political ideology and your commitment to your rhetorical heros demand - but the facts don't change.

 

[Borat]

yes anthropogenic global warming is a scam.

global warming is caused by cycles in sun spot activity.

sun spots affect solar radiation which affects cloud seeding.

clouds in term drive the temperature on earth.

carbon dioxide is indeed linked to global temperature. however carbon dioxide level is DRIVEN by earth's temperature. it is the passenger - not the driver.

you could find 100 different factors which track global temperature and claim that they are the CAUSE of global warming ( if you were Al Gore that is ).

you could say that its the tree rings that cause global warming. let's cut down all the trees then global warming will go away. etc.

anthropogenic global warming is simply a fairy tale used to introduce the carbon tax.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Yes and No. Obviously Climate on earth changes and at times the Planet does go through warming trends but at other times the Planet goes through Cooling trends as well. So Global Warming is real but so is Global Cooling. It's the Global Warming fanatics who have turned this issue into a hysterical fear mongering Hoax. They have created a Doomsday Cult full of Sky is Falling Loons who have been absolutely shameful and irresponsible with all their hysterical fear mongering. These Loons also have an obvious political agenda as well. Just take a closer look at who is behind this scam and that is where you will find all your answers. For the most part they are all wild-eyed hysterical Leftists/Socialists. The Global Warming fanatics have simply tried to silence all dissent and declare the case closed. There is much more research that has to be done on Climate Change and the case is definitely not closed. So as far as all the Leftist/Socialist over-dramatic Fear Mongering goes,yes Global Warming is a Hoax.

 

[Zander]

It is a scam. A hoax perpetrated for money and for power.

People need to 'believe in' something. For secular humanists who have rejected religiosity, the new religion of today is "Earth" and "global warming". Ironically, they've returned to paganism!

The facts are out now, the data was faked. The AGW debate relied upon a shaky correlation argument to begin with and now that myth has now been destroyed. There is no correlation and there never was any causation! Yet sadly, those who stand to profit from the hoax along with and their fervent minions, continue to defend AGW in the face of reality.

In the end, the truth will win. The data was faked. It was a hoax.

None of what you've posted is fact. You are just as bad as those you accuse.

I am not a scientist who is paid to lie. I am merely posting my OPINION. Now, if I gathered a bunch of people who were paid to agree with me, called my "opinion" science, and deemed said "science" as SETTLED, then faked data to "prove" my "science" was real, then stifled any debate about my dubious "science", you'd have a point. But I have not done any of that. I merely stated my opinion based upon the information we have readily available.

However, since AGW is nothing more than an unproven opinion you are partially right.

 

[Borat]

The best scientific evidence very strongly suggests (but cannot prove without any shadow of a doubt) that climate change is real and that human activity is contributing.
In spite of an attempt to create the illusion of a lack of consensus among the scientific community - an overwhelming consensus (in fact NO peer-reviewed work has refuted the premise of Anthropogenic climate change) has emerged.

Does it mean that it is impossible that they are all wrong? Nope - it is possible they are wrong.

As to a vast conspiracy among the world's scientific community to perpetuate a hoax - absurd. WAAAY TOO MANY people would have to be involved with not a single one EVER "coming clean." Also, when have people from all over the globe ever been able to agree to secretly participate in something like this. Too absurd for serious consideration.

AND the profit motive would support denying climate change far more than it would support accepting it.

The absolute best information available and the overwhelming consensus of the scientific community supports the premise that our climate is changing and that human activity is contributing to that change (although the extent to which human activity is contributing is certainly not agreed upon).

So there are the simple facts. Twist, spin, hurl faux science as your political ideology and your commitment to your rhetorical heros demand - but the facts don't change.

you're some kind of a fucking idiot aren't you ?

you stupid bitch keep repeating the talking points from Al Gore movie but did you ever actually pass the science class in your kindergarden ?

could you explain what the science is and the evidence instead of writing that Al Gore has already proven everything while he was inventing the internet ?

 

[Truthmatters]

So is evolution

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Global Warming is as real as Global Cooling is. The Hoax is how the Leftists/Socialists have gone out and fear mongered and tried to silence all dissent. So Global Warming is and isn't a Hoax in the end. The Earth's Climate does change obviously and does go through both Warming and Cooling trends. The Leftists/Socialists have simply created a Global Warming Doomsday Cult and are using it to advance a political agenda. Much more research on Climate has to be done so the case is definitely not closed. The Leftists/Socialists have tried by any means to silence anyone who dares to disagree with their hysterical Doomsday scenarios. There is very little Science in all this and rather an awful lot of politics. Global Warming may very well be the biggest Crime & Hoax ever perpetrated against Mankind.

 

[nodoginnafight]

The best scientific evidence very strongly suggests (but cannot prove without any shadow of a doubt) that climate change is real and that human activity is contributing.
In spite of an attempt to create the illusion of a lack of consensus among the scientific community - an overwhelming consensus (in fact NO peer-reviewed work has refuted the premise of Anthropogenic climate change) has emerged.

Does it mean that it is impossible that they are all wrong? Nope - it is possible they are wrong.

As to a vast conspiracy among the world's scientific community to perpetuate a hoax - absurd. WAAAY TOO MANY people would have to be involved with not a single one EVER "coming clean." Also, when have people from all over the globe ever been able to agree to secretly participate in something like this. Too absurd for serious consideration.

AND the profit motive would support denying climate change far more than it would support accepting it.

The absolute best information available and the overwhelming consensus of the scientific community supports the premise that our climate is changing and that human activity is contributing to that change (although the extent to which human activity is contributing is certainly not agreed upon).

So there are the simple facts. Twist, spin, hurl faux science as your political ideology and your commitment to your rhetorical heros demand - but the facts don't change.

you're some kind of a fucking idiot aren't you ?

you stupid bitch keep repeating the talking points from Al Gore movie but did you ever actually pass the science class in your kindergarden ?

could you explain what the science is and the evidence instead of writing that Al Gore has already proven everything while he was inventing the internet ?

ahhh that elevated Borat IQ on display once more. I'm having such a hard time understanding some of your bigger words ....

google beyond the ivory tower.

It clearly puts to rest any nonesense about a lack of consensus in the scientific community.

 

[Dr.Traveler]

I am looking for information regarding the scientists that collect data on Global climate temperatures.

There is sufficient evidence that the climate here on Earth has been trending upwards. There is a lack of evidence showing that actions on the part of humans are behind the warming.

Correlation doesn't mean causation. Most of the arguments for man made global warming seem to fall into that logical trap. My favorite example of correlation vs causation is....

Hemline/Skirt Length Indicator

This theory suggests that the direction of the economy can be predicted based upon the average length of hems in that year’s new fashion lines. If skirts are short, markets are on the rise. Conversely, if skirts are long, markets are heading down.

It is worth following the trends in climate as civilization is surprisngly dependent on climate. If you have time, research the "Little Ice Age". It helped bring on a situation in Europe where people literally thought God's Wrath had fallen on mankind.