Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Sunni Man, Oct 13, 2010.
We were all black in Africa, then in the blink of an eye, as soon as we migrated north of Sicily humans all turned white! the when we migrated to Asia, we turned yellow! and the red in America (Does this make sense to anyone?)
Adaptation to the environment is not evolution.
God made us different colors so that we would kill and enslave eachother based upon skin pigment for thousands of years.
What a clever God.
Ever hear of Vitamin D?
With a time period of 4 billion years in which to evolve, incredible complexity is a given.
Old Rocks used to worship this chart. It is nothing more than just a cartoon.
They said the same thing about the eye, but that's been shown to be false. I'm sure that this process is not irreducible and, if it is, it only proves that God created bacteria, while evolution provided the means to further complexity. None of this happened "suddenly" despite what some may say.
Don't expect to change anyone's mind. faith in evolution is just as much a religious belief as faith in intelligent creation.
Astrology is scientific theory, courtroom told
Astrology would be considered a scientific theory if judged by the same criteria used by a well-known advocate of Intelligent Design to justify his claim that ID is science, a landmark US trial heard on Tuesday.
Under cross examination, ID proponent Michael Behe, a biochemist at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, admitted his definition of "theory" was so broad it would also include astrology.
Astrology is scientific theory, courtroom told - science-in-society - 19 October 2005 - New Scientist
Because ID has been rejected by virtually every scientist and science organisation, and has never once passed the muster of a peer-reviewed journal paper, Behe admitted that the controversial theory would not be included in the NAS definition. "I can't point to an external community that would agree that this was well substantiated," he said.
Behe said he had come up with his own "broader" definition of a theory, claiming that this more accurately describes the way theories are actually used by scientists. "The word is used a lot more loosely than the NAS defined it," he says.
WHAT'S YOUR SIGN????
Separate names with a comma.