Irony: CAIR Refusing to Cooperate in Hearings On Why Muslims Don't Cooperate

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TheSeeker, Mar 10, 2011.

  1. TheSeeker
    Offline

    TheSeeker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    353
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +48
    Much like union leadership lives on another planet far removed from reality, the leadership of the Muslim community are equally removed, stonewalling authorities in the US who are simply trying to keep American safe from Islamic extremists. CAIR is part of the leadership - a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood - and has itself been implicated in terrorism. Said organization was tagged as an unindicted co-conspirator in raising money to fund Hamas terrorism. Hamas murders people.

    So it's quite the irony that as the US House hearing on Islamic extremism, its threat to the US, and why the leadership of the Muslim community refuses to cooperate, CAIR... refuses to cooperate!? Doesn't this prove why the hearings are necessary? Thanks for making Rep. King's point for him! :

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 19, 2014
  2. bodecea
    Online

    bodecea Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    89,148
    Thanks Received:
    10,377
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    #HasNoClothes
    Ratings:
    +23,672
    You heard it here first, folks....Unions will now be compared to radical Mooooslims. :clap2::clap2::clap2: Look for more of the same.
     
  3. TheSeeker
    Offline

    TheSeeker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    353
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +48
    If the shoe fits as they say.

    PS: Nice attempt at diversion...but you got caught.
     
  4. 8537
    Offline

    8537 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,754
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New England's West Coast
    Ratings:
    +729
    Why would you expect CAIR to participate in kangaroo court where they will be hoisted by their own petard?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. TheSeeker
    Offline

    TheSeeker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    353
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +48

    Well, let's see.....

    It's not a COURT at all and no one will be convicted or found guilty of anything for starters.

    Secondly, they simply make Peter King's point for the hearings for him by refusing to cooperate.
     
  6. 8537
    Offline

    8537 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,754
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New England's West Coast
    Ratings:
    +729
    Kangaroo court....kangaroo court...

    no, by appearing they would simply pay credit to Mr King's absurd witch hunt. If Mr King is so anxious to talk to them, perhaps he should issue a legislative subpoena.
     
  7. TheSeeker
    Offline

    TheSeeker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    353
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +48

    Yes, I definitely took note of that terminology.

    My statement still stands.

    A "kangaroo court" is one that implies they are going to be tried and the outcome is predetermined.

    Hearings such as what is happening today have no such premise. It's a fact-finding hearing where no judgments will be determined and therefore no predetermined outcome will be pronounced.

    I'm not sure fact-finding hearing have that power. If so, perhaps he should.

    That still doesn't change the fact that by refusing to appear when asked to, they prove the necessity for the hearings for him.

    I don't know why you call them absurd since even Napolitano and Holder have said that their biggest fear is homegrown terrorism spawned by the radicalization of Muslims living in the USA. Does it not make perfect sense to explore the causes and prevalence of that?
     
  8. 8537
    Offline

    8537 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,754
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New England's West Coast
    Ratings:
    +729
    He has that power. Just ask Mark McGwire.

    No, by refusing to appear they don't give Mr King more than the 1/4 ounce of respect he deserves for creating such a stupid waste of taxpayer dollars in order to prove his own ignorance.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2011
  9. TheSeeker
    Offline

    TheSeeker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    353
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +48
    It isn't a legal proceeding, but a fact finding hearing. There will be no guilt or innocence determined.

    Definition of KANGAROO COURT
    1
    : a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted
    2
    : a court characterized by irresponsible, unauthorized, or irregular status or procedures
    3
    : judgment or punishment given outside of legal procedure




    So I take it you are not worried like Holder and Napolitano about domestic radicalized Muslim terrorism happening in the USA?

    You are fine with that?

    Maybe the problem is that you don't know what "irony" is???
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2011
  10. TheSeeker
    Offline

    TheSeeker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    353
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +48

    So you think Holder and Napolitano are "ignorant" people for saying that they worry about homegrown radicalized Muslim terrorism ?
     

Share This Page