Iraqi WMD's Finally Found? In Syria?

BlackFlag10

College Conservative
Jun 1, 2012
121
41
46
READ THE FULL STORY HERE Cameron Harris: Iraqi WMD's Finally Found?




In 2003, American forces entered Iraq on the pretense that Saddam Hussein was harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction. Since that invasion, George W. Bush has faced harsh criticism from many for starting a war that was “unjustified.” While it is true that American forces never found evidence of such WMD’s, it was never entirely proven that these weapons did not exist. There was never any concrete indication of where these weapons may be…until now.

Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria is currently in conflict with a group of Syrian rebels who call themselves the Free Syrian Army. The country is in full civil war, and the leader is beginning to panic. It is a common assumption that he will soon give the order to begin using chemicals weapons against the rebels and even civilians. The United States and Israel know that he has such weapons, but it is unclear where exactly these weapons came from.

However, the number two general in Saddam Hussein’s air force says that these chemical weapons are the WMD’s that we did not find in Iraq.

In 2006, Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force under Hussein before he defected, wrote a detailed narrative called “Saddam’s Secrets.” In this book, Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.
 
Last edited:
Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

rather than using them ... whats your point?

and they were well documented by their use against the Curds a decade earlier with no response from the US.

they found nothing (new) they claimed existed as reason for their unprovoked and unfunded invasion of a sovereign nation.
 
Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

rather than using them ... whats your point?

and they were well documented by their use against the Curds a decade earlier with no response from the US.

they found nothing (new) they claimed existed as reason for their unprovoked and unfunded invasion of a sovereign nation.


My point is that they did not find them because they were moved to Syria. Is that so hard to grasp?
 
READ THE FULL STORY HERE Cameron Harris: Iraqi WMD's Finally Found?




In 2003, American forces entered Iraq on the pretense that Saddam Hussein was harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction. Since that invasion, George W. Bush has faced harsh criticism from many for starting a war that was “unjustified.” While it is true that American forces never found evidence of such WMD’s, it was never entirely proven that these weapons did not exist. There was never any concrete indication of where these weapons may be…until now.

Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria is currently in conflict with a group of Syrian rebels who call themselves the Free Syrian Army. The country is in full civil war, and the leader is beginning to panic. It is a common assumption that he will soon give the order to begin using chemicals weapons against the rebels and even civilians. The United States and Israel know that he has such weapons, but it is unclear where exactly these weapons came from.

However, the number two general in Saddam Hussein’s air force says that these chemical weapons are the WMD’s that we did not find in Iraq.

In 2006, Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force under Hussein before he defected, wrote a detailed narrative called “Saddam’s Secrets.” In this book, Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

I realize you righties are really reaching right now, but if Saddam was willing to fight with conventional weapons, why would he have sent his WMDs off to Syria?
 
READ THE FULL STORY HERE Cameron Harris: Iraqi WMD's Finally Found?




In 2003, American forces entered Iraq on the pretense that Saddam Hussein was harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction. Since that invasion, George W. Bush has faced harsh criticism from many for starting a war that was “unjustified.” While it is true that American forces never found evidence of such WMD’s, it was never entirely proven that these weapons did not exist. There was never any concrete indication of where these weapons may be…until now.

Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria is currently in conflict with a group of Syrian rebels who call themselves the Free Syrian Army. The country is in full civil war, and the leader is beginning to panic. It is a common assumption that he will soon give the order to begin using chemicals weapons against the rebels and even civilians. The United States and Israel know that he has such weapons, but it is unclear where exactly these weapons came from.

However, the number two general in Saddam Hussein’s air force says that these chemical weapons are the WMD’s that we did not find in Iraq.

In 2006, Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force under Hussein before he defected, wrote a detailed narrative called “Saddam’s Secrets.” In this book, Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

I realize you righties are really reaching right now, but if Saddam was willing to fight with conventional weapons, why would he have sent his WMDs off to Syria?

Because he knew that he was not going to use them against us. That would have been idiotic for him to do so.
 
READ THE FULL STORY HERE Cameron Harris: Iraqi WMD's Finally Found?




In 2003, American forces entered Iraq on the pretense that Saddam Hussein was harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction. Since that invasion, George W. Bush has faced harsh criticism from many for starting a war that was “unjustified.” While it is true that American forces never found evidence of such WMD’s, it was never entirely proven that these weapons did not exist. There was never any concrete indication of where these weapons may be…until now.

Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria is currently in conflict with a group of Syrian rebels who call themselves the Free Syrian Army. The country is in full civil war, and the leader is beginning to panic. It is a common assumption that he will soon give the order to begin using chemicals weapons against the rebels and even civilians. The United States and Israel know that he has such weapons, but it is unclear where exactly these weapons came from.

However, the number two general in Saddam Hussein’s air force says that these chemical weapons are the WMD’s that we did not find in Iraq.

In 2006, Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force under Hussein before he defected, wrote a detailed narrative called “Saddam’s Secrets.” In this book, Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

I realize you righties are really reaching right now, but if Saddam was willing to fight with conventional weapons, why would he have sent his WMDs off to Syria?

Because he knew that he was not going to use them against us. That would have been idiotic for him to do so.

Really? Explain that logic, please.
 
I realize you righties are really reaching right now, but if Saddam was willing to fight with conventional weapons, why would he have sent his WMDs off to Syria?

Because he knew that he was not going to use them against us. That would have been idiotic for him to do so.

Really? Explain that logic, please.

If you were a dictator who knew that he could hide his WMD's and maybe escape some punishment that was coming, wouldn't you do that? Instead of using chemical weapons on American troops? Who is really going to use chemical weapons on American troops?
 
Because he knew that he was not going to use them against us. That would have been idiotic for him to do so.

Really? Explain that logic, please.

If you were a dictator who knew that he could hide his WMD's and maybe escape some punishment that was coming, wouldn't you do that? Instead of using chemical weapons on American troops? Who is really going to use chemical weapons on American troops?

Knowing that the US would never use any of it's nuclear weapons again, what would Saddam have to lose? He already knew he was facing the largest, most powerful military our tax dollars could buy, and had ZERO chance of being victorious against it. Saddam's stand in the sand, was nothing but a suicide mission and he knew it. Why NOT use the chemical weapons he supposedly had?
 
The GOP thugs told us they had "WMD's and we know where they are", and were already found for the reason for the Iraq war. Does this now confirm W and the GOP were lying to us?
 
I have been saying it for years that Saddam had enough time to get the weapons out of his country. He did not let the inspectors in for years before we attacked them. He had plenty of time to get them to Syria and it seems like that is just what he did
 
Anyone with a brain knows the WMDs went to Syria. Saddam was a Bathist and so is Assad. Duh!!
 
Last edited:
Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

rather than using them ... whats your point?

and they were well documented by their use against the Curds a decade earlier with no response from the US.

they found nothing (new) they claimed existed as reason for their unprovoked and unfunded invasion of a sovereign nation.

The Curds.... he gassed the Curds? Yummy.
 
READ THE FULL STORY HERE Cameron Harris: Iraqi WMD's Finally Found?




In 2003, American forces entered Iraq on the pretense that Saddam Hussein was harboring Weapons of Mass Destruction. Since that invasion, George W. Bush has faced harsh criticism from many for starting a war that was “unjustified.” While it is true that American forces never found evidence of such WMD’s, it was never entirely proven that these weapons did not exist. There was never any concrete indication of where these weapons may be…until now.

Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria is currently in conflict with a group of Syrian rebels who call themselves the Free Syrian Army. The country is in full civil war, and the leader is beginning to panic. It is a common assumption that he will soon give the order to begin using chemicals weapons against the rebels and even civilians. The United States and Israel know that he has such weapons, but it is unclear where exactly these weapons came from.

However, the number two general in Saddam Hussein’s air force says that these chemical weapons are the WMD’s that we did not find in Iraq.

In 2006, Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force under Hussein before he defected, wrote a detailed narrative called “Saddam’s Secrets.” In this book, Sada details how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria in the weeks leading up to the US-led operation to eliminated Hussein’s weapons threat.

I realize you righties are really reaching right now, but if Saddam was willing to fight with conventional weapons, why would he have sent his WMDs off to Syria?

Are you really that shallow with your thinking?
 
The GOP thugs told us they had "WMD's and we know where they are", and were already found for the reason for the Iraq war. Does this now confirm W and the GOP were lying to us?

Hey, asshat, many prominent Dems including Clinton told us back in the nineties they had WMD's.

They had WMD's.
 
Because he knew that he was not going to use them against us. That would have been idiotic for him to do so.

Really? Explain that logic, please.

If you were a dictator who knew that he could hide his WMD's and maybe escape some punishment that was coming, wouldn't you do that? Instead of using chemical weapons on American troops? Who is really going to use chemical weapons on American troops?

So ... your theory is that Saddam, knowing we were about to invade, smuggled all his WMDs to Syria without any country seeing it or stopping it ... but he chose NOT to smuggle himself, but rather, try to escape later, maybe, or not at all, and possibly try to avoid punishment, while hiding in a hole.

Wow dude. Are you a Hollywood script writer?
 
Really? Explain that logic, please.

If you were a dictator who knew that he could hide his WMD's and maybe escape some punishment that was coming, wouldn't you do that? Instead of using chemical weapons on American troops? Who is really going to use chemical weapons on American troops?

Knowing that the US would never use any of it's nuclear weapons again, what would Saddam have to lose? He already knew he was facing the largest, most powerful military our tax dollars could buy, and had ZERO chance of being victorious against it. Saddam's stand in the sand, was nothing but a suicide mission and he knew it. Why NOT use the chemical weapons he supposedly had?

In all fairness if Saddam used his chemical weapons the gloves would have come off, Iraq would have been pounded into submission with everything we had. It would have been Armaggadon for them and he knew that, which is why he didn't use chemical weapons against us in the Gulf War either.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top