Iraqi ambassador slams Obama, praises Bush

[U2Edge]

Kosh what was it Iraq did to us that caused us to invade?

And don't give me that bullshit about what a "bad" mad Saddam was. And how the "world is a better place with out him".

That is bullshit. There are bad men all over the world. We aren't invading them.

SO go ahead with your pea brain and tell me why the invasion of Iraq was justified. No one else has ever been able to do that. Even if you make shit up or you are going to point out how so many Dems hated Saddam.

Saddam had created many reasons to hate him. But not done a damn thing to us to cause us to invade.

What was it that caused us to invade Germany?

Did Germany attack the US?

Why was the Germany Invasion justified by killing millions of Germans in bombing campaigns?

The far left does not understand the false argument on Iraq as they believe Iraq had no history before 2003.

Far left propaganda is used to justify their stance on Iraq and not facts.

The far left wants Iraq to be a failure just like they did Vietnam even though it was the (D)'s JFK and JBJ that got the ball rolling.

Germany declared war on the US.

Yes.

2003 Iraq was not 1941 Germany.

The Vietnam war was started at the end of WWII when France decided it wanted it's colony back.

Iraq didn't have to be 1941 Germany in 2003, plus the United States and Iraq were already technically at war and had been since the 1991 Gulf War, with the United States bombing Iraq every year in between 1991 and 2003 for Saddam's continued violations of the 1991 Gulf War ceacefire agreement.

 

[U2Edge]

9-11 gave the Bush Administration a catastrophe that they then exploited to invade an oil rich Arab Nation that was not a threat to our national security and had not been involved in the attacks that day. It is exactly what bin Laden wanted to propel and expand al Qaeda's influence. Both Rice and Powell had stated earlier in 2001 that Saddam was no longer a threat and that he had not been able to rebuild either his army or his WMD programs.

No matter how many times liberals say that the war was over oil it has been shown to be not true. Oil was suppose to pay for the war, never did. The liberals said we were going to take their oil, never did. Yes, invading Iran and Kuwait is a threat to our national security whether or not you wish to admit that fact.

As for Powell an Rice. I assuming that once again that the liberal left doesn't think blacks can think for themselves. Here is the conclusion of Powell's address to the UN in 2003.

CNN.com - Transcript of Powell's U.N. presentation - Feb. 6, 2003

Our entire foreign policy in the ME is about one thing. Oil and keeping the spigot open. We were buying Iraq oil before and after the war. It's not about the citizens or consumers, it's about which multinational company has the contracts to do business.

There are clips of both Powell and Rice making those very statements in 2001. Race has nothing to do with it.

Powell made statements in early 2001 that had been true in the early 1990s but were no longer technically true by 2001. In addition, Powell never said that Iraq was no longer a threat in any capacity at all and that the United States no longer needed to continue its annual limited military action against Iraq as well as try to maintain sanctions and embargo against Saddam which by that time were crumbling.

Ultimately, it was the crumbling of the key means of containment of Saddam, sanctions and the embargo, which made regime change a necessity. Waiting longer to remove Saddam when only lead to a more costly invasion and occupation. The United States did the right thing and removed Saddam at the right time.