Iraq per capita GDP growth rate 71% a year..

That's good for the Iraqis. Too bad it isn't benefiting the US at all. $2 trillion down the drain for reconstruction that was supposed to pay for itself and a new ally for Iran.
 
Iraq prosperous? That's impossible! Why?

Because of their Constitution, which states:

Every citizen has the right to health care. The state takes care of public health and provide the means of prevention and treatment by building different types of hospitals and medical institutions.

No nation can be prosperous with socialized medicine...

...so I've been told...
 
Ask the Sunni's or Christian's how great the "new" Iraq is. Better yet, ask the man on the street how much of that "per captia" GDP is making its way down to him.

ps: I suspect a lot of that increase is driven by construction to rebuild the shit we blew up.
 
Ask the Sunni's or Christian's how great the "new" Iraq is. Better yet, ask the man on the street how much of that "per captia" GDP is making its way down to him.

ps: I suspect a lot of that increase is driven by construction to rebuild the shit we blew up.

You are sour grapes because JFK and LBJ failed in the liberation war you participated in.
 
Ask the Sunni's or Christian's how great the "new" Iraq is. Better yet, ask the man on the street how much of that "per captia" GDP is making its way down to him.

ps: I suspect a lot of that increase is driven by construction to rebuild the shit we blew up.

You are sour grapes because JFK and LBJ failed in the liberation war you participated in.

(Shrugs) At least I went hunting commies instead of coons.
 
That's good for the Iraqis. Too bad it isn't benefiting the US at all. $2 trillion down the drain for reconstruction that was supposed to pay for itself and a new ally for Iran.

HEY are you paying any mortgages or credit card or car payments??

Why don't you stop? What keeps you paying for them? Are you an idiot?? YOU don't need to spend one more dime on any of those loans!

IN FACT why does the USA sign ANY treaties, agreements, etc.??? That's garbage and a real waste.

For example... WHY did we ever sign the 1991 CEASE FIRE with Saddam?

I mean we didn't keep the agreement's terms that if EITHER party broke the agreement the "CEASE FIRE " STOPPED!!
THAT WAS the agreement right?

Some point some adult had to stand up to Saddam and say "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"!

And these 32 DEMOCRAT QUOTES WERE SAYING THAT!!

SO TELL ME AGAIN... why are you making any payments, KEEPING ANY AGREEMENTS when YOU make your stupid idiotic comments about
"1991 CEASE FIRE" resumed.......In response to 500 documented violations by 1993, including one combat violation, the ..

32 democrat quotes indicate even before GWB that Saddam was a threat!
"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.
 
That's good for the Iraqis. Too bad it isn't benefiting the US at all. $2 trillion down the drain for reconstruction that was supposed to pay for itself and a new ally for Iran.

HEY are you paying any mortgages or credit card or car payments??

Why don't you stop? What keeps you paying for them? Are you an idiot?? YOU don't need to spend one more dime on any of those loans!

IN FACT why does the USA sign ANY treaties, agreements, etc.??? That's garbage and a real waste.

For example... WHY did we ever sign the 1991 CEASE FIRE with Saddam?

I mean we didn't keep the agreement's terms that if EITHER party broke the agreement the "CEASE FIRE " STOPPED!!
THAT WAS the agreement right?

Some point some adult had to stand up to Saddam and say "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"!

And these 32 DEMOCRAT QUOTES WERE SAYING THAT!!

SO TELL ME AGAIN... why are you making any payments, KEEPING ANY AGREEMENTS when YOU make your stupid idiotic comments about
"1991 CEASE FIRE" resumed.......In response to 500 documented violations by 1993, including one combat violation, the ..

32 democrat quotes indicate even before GWB that Saddam was a threat!
"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger Clinton Ntl. Secur. Advr 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"..give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs..threat our security"..Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003.

He's just pissed that we didn't let Sadaam take over all the mideast oil fields and have us be paying $11 a gallon in gas right now.
 
This is what the warmonger right has been reduced to...


...to the parents of a soldier who died in Iraq:

...sorry for your loss, but cheer up! Think of all the young people in Baghdad who now have cell phones! and cable!
 
Last edited:
Was it worth 4000+ American lives so the Iraqis can make more money?

How many American lives are you willing to spend to bring 21st century pleasantries to the North Koreans?

Yes. Much better payoff than the failed Democrat effort in Vietnam, for example!

You were supposed to learn from that mistake. Bush didn't. No surprises there...


Of course he didn't learn anything from Vietnam. Neither did Dick Cheney. Know why?

BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T GO! They used their connections to avoid the war like good little Chickenhawk's.
 
Iraq prosperous? That's impossible! Why?

Because of their Constitution, which states:

Every citizen has the right to health care. The state takes care of public health and provide the means of prevention and treatment by building different types of hospitals and medical institutions.

No nation can be prosperous with socialized medicine...

...so I've been told...

:lol:

Actually, no nation can be prosperous with socialized anything.
 
Kinda like Bubba CLinton?

Yup, exactly. The only difference is that Clinton didn't have enough sense to deny he was a coward or try to hide what he was doing behind student deferments or service in the National Guard.

And, before it gets started, everyone alive back then knows the Guard of the 1960's is NOT the same Guard of the 21st century. It was a haven for people avoiding Vietnam and it generally took influence to get in because the waiting list was so long.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top