Iranian Forces Crossed Iraqi Border

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by red states rule, Jun 27, 2007.

  1. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
    I thought libs said Iran was not a problem.........


    Iranian forces crossed Iraqi border: report

    Jun 25 07:23 PM US/Eastern


    Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces have been spotted by British troops crossing the border into southern Iraq, The Sun tabloid reported on Tuesday.
    Britain's defence ministry would not confirm or deny the report, with a spokesman declining to comment on "intelligence matters".

    An unidentified intelligence source told the tabloid: "It is an extremely alarming development and raises the stakes considerably. In effect, it means we are in a full on war with Iran -- but nobody has officially declared it."

    "We have hard proof that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps have crossed the border to attack us. It is very hard for us to strike back. All we can do is try to defend ourselves. We are badly on the back foot."

    The Sun said that radar sightings of Iranian helicopters crossing into the Iraqi desert were confirmed to it by very senior military sources.

    In response to the report, a British defence ministry spokesman said: "There is evidence that explosive devices used against our troops in southern Iraq originated in Iran."

    "Any Iranian link to armed militias in Iraq either through weapons supply, training or funding are unacceptable."

    Britain has about 7,100 soldiers in Iraq, most of whom are based in the southern city of Basra and surrounding areas, though the government has pledged to reduce that to between 5,000 and 5,500 this year.

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070625232254.etwt6z5u&show_article=1
     
  2. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
    I know - libs will say its Bush's fault
     
  3. maineman
    Offline

    maineman BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    13,003
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    guess
    Ratings:
    +572
    I have never said that Iran would not be a problem.

    When you re-empower the shi'ite majority in Iraq, it is inevitable that they will align themselves with their shiite brethren to the east.

    We ought not to be surprised that Iran is now asserting greater influence on Iraq.
     
  4. mattskramer
    Offline

    mattskramer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    5,852
    Thanks Received:
    359
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +359
    First of all, the Iraq invasion and occupation was not necessary. Secondly, Bush clearly blundered. He probably did not plan ahead for the civil war and insurgency. When the war started he did not supply nearly enough men and weapons. It is a mess but we did enough. Bush’s old nemesis, Saddam, is dead. Iraq has a new government. (These two events took more death than was necessary.) Now it is time for us to pick up our stuff and reposition our troops elsewhere. To do so would not be to surrender to anything. It would be to end our participation in a mess that we never should have gotten involved in to begin with. We would simply leave the Iraqi’s to settle their own problems while we redirect our resources to intelligence and border security.
     
  5. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    You are correct in that assumption Maine Man about the influence Iran would have with other Shia's in the region.:thup: :eusa_clap:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    So what we crossed Iraq's border too.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    I believe intended point here is to point out the religious issue that will become more of a issue between Shias and Sunnis. If the US had never gone into Iraq and Saddam either died or was killed somehow this very situation would have happened due to religious tension in that part of the world.
     
  8. actsnoblemartin
    Offline

    actsnoblemartin I love Andrea & April

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,039
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    La Mesa, CA
    Ratings:
    +407
    The question i have for you is. Will the persian shiites, align themselves with arab shiites?

    Just a question?.

    if a civil war breaks out, I mean worse then now, what should we do ?

     
  9. actsnoblemartin
    Offline

    actsnoblemartin I love Andrea & April

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,039
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    La Mesa, CA
    Ratings:
    +407
    maineman, are you aware, millions of cambodians were murdered after we left vietnam?. 3 million to be exact, but nobody brings that up.

    any comment?
     
  10. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
    Do you think libs care about the people of Iraq? To libs they do not give a nshit how many people die if they get their surrender bill passes

    All they care about is their political power
     

Share This Page