Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is a scare tactic and placing warships off the coast of America, though it would be a huge attaboy from their fellow jihadist, is very likely outside of the realm of possibility.
If they took all their combat ships and tenders, I wouldn't bet half of them would make the trip back home to be appluaded
Great pussy too. Don't fuck with the Latins with this brainwashing bullshit.Tell ya what, those Latinas won't put up with any of their misogynistic bullshit either... they'll wake to her standing over him with a knife in one hand and his fun stick in the other!
What are you crazy? Both those places have a thriving prostitution sector.
Fuck Wally, Geeziss, Bootsa and all the rest.
We have fucking to do.
Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
"Millions for defense but not one cent for welfare!"
I'm sure you know the history of that statement, "counselor" <snort>.
Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
"Millions for defense but not one cent for welfare!"
I'm sure you know the history of that statement, "counselor" <snort>.
Honestly I would consider defense spending a kind of welfare of security.
im pretty sure if back in those days a Country that was considered hostile moved a war ship off our shores.....they would have reacted in some manner....Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
"Millions for defense but not one cent for welfare!"
I'm sure you know the history of that statement, "counselor" <snort>.
Honestly I would consider defense spending a kind of welfare of security.
Surely you know the origin of the phrase
Honestly I would consider defense spending a kind of welfare of security.
Surely you know the origin of the phrase
It's a replacement for the word charity originally.
Language evolves over time though.
Surely you know the origin of the phrase
It's a replacement for the word charity originally.
Language evolves over time though.
My bad. It was:
Millions for defense, but not cent for tribute.
im pretty sure if back in those days a Country that was considered hostile moved a war ship off our shores.....they would have reacted in some manner....Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
"Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to American marine borders," the head of the Navy, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said, according to the official IRNA news agency.
Speaking at a ceremony marking the 31st anniversary of the start of the 1980-1988 war with Iraq, Sayyari gave no details of when such a deployment could happen or the number or type of vessels to be used.
NATO would blow them out of the water if they tried to sink a cruise ship.....looks like Turkey would call an Article 5 before they US had a chance....NATO's fleet is likely bigger than ours is.The declaration comes just weeks after Turkey said it would host a NATO early warning radar system which will help spot missile threats from outside Europe, including potentially from Iran. The decision has angered Tehran which had enjoyed close relations with Ankara.
Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
"Millions for defense but not one cent for welfare!"
I'm sure you know the history of that statement, "counselor" <snort>.
American delegate Charles Pinckney actually responded, "No, no, not a sixpence, sir!" The quote, "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute," was actually made by Robert Goodloe Harper as a toast at a dinner shortly after the American delegation returned home. The next day a newspaper printed the toast from the night before and soon people began using it as a rallying cry.
"Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to American marine borders," the head of the Navy, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said, according to the official IRNA news agency.
A powerful presence? That is what they call a powerful presence? They must still live in the dark ages and not realize what the US fleet actually looks like?
Speaking at a ceremony marking the 31st anniversary of the start of the 1980-1988 war with Iraq, Sayyari gave no details of when such a deployment could happen or the number or type of vessels to be used.
If they used every ship and sub in their fleet what would the total be? They have just over 200 total including their subs...they only have 13 submarines total, they mostly have patrol boats meant for coastal duties, they have about 100 of them....and about 100 missle boats...they have 5 frigates, 3 Corvettes, and 24 FAC's...they have nothing basically...we have on the other hand...286 ships, 11 Aircraft carriers, 9 amphibeous assault ships, 8 amphibious landing ships, 22 Cruisers, 60 destroyers, 27 frigates, and 75 subs, if they want to show a threatening presence they need to spend a hell of a lot of money to do so....our ship crews would laugh their tails off.
NATO would blow them out of the water if they tried to sink a cruise ship.....looks like Turkey would call an Article 5 before they US had a chance....NATO's fleet is likely bigger than ours is.The declaration comes just weeks after Turkey said it would host a NATO early warning radar system which will help spot missile threats from outside Europe, including potentially from Iran. The decision has angered Tehran which had enjoyed close relations with Ankara.
It's a replacement for the word charity originally.
Language evolves over time though.
My bad. It was:
Millions for defense, but not cent for tribute.
Tribute to what exactly?
Tell ya what, those Latinas won't put up with any of their misogynistic bullshit either... they'll wake to her standing over him with a knife in one hand and his fun stick in the other!
Cuba, Venezuela, may very well embrace them.
Those Iranians just want to take some shore leave I'm tellin you, everytime theres a TDY here in the States for the Gulf Arab countries those guys are tripping over themselves to volunteer just to get away for a while and drink in peace and visit a strip club.
Yeah. That's what the founding fathers want...citizens who cheer "bring it on, bitches!" and who smile at the prospect of war.
"Millions for defense but not one cent for welfare!"
I'm sure you know the history of that statement, "counselor" <snort>.
Seems you don't.
Millions for defense. But not one cent for tribute. This was the American reaction to whom
American delegate Charles Pinckney actually responded, "No, no, not a sixpence, sir!" The quote, "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute," was actually made by Robert Goodloe Harper as a toast at a dinner shortly after the American delegation returned home. The next day a newspaper printed the toast from the night before and soon people began using it as a rallying cry.
