Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Annie, Jul 17, 2004.
If Bush Wins?
This must be why Clinton says N Korea is more dangerous.
LOL, they both strike me as very dangerous. To say the least!
I'm more inclined to be for a war in Iran than I was for a war in Iraq. The threat seems to be more in line with reality. However, if it is determined to be necessary to go to war with Iran, where exactly are we going to get the troops to do so?
We'll look forward to your posts on that then.
I read an article and post on this yesterday, but it also included the Iraeli "contribution" to this whole scenario. I will have to see if I can find it.
Anyway, my thoughts were and still are - if there is any truth to the rumored leak, I cannot imagine why the London Times would be the chosen outlet. However, if it was a diversionary leak or a fishing expedition, ok. The pther piece I am going to try and find had to do with Israel promising to attack if nuclear fuel rods are delivered by Russia. My thought on that is that is has to be a ploy. Israel usually does not talk out of school like that.
What you say makes sense to me, I'd love to see the link if you can locate.
Here is the source:
Thread was from another board.
Just so we are clear...
The primary reason we went to war with Iraq was Saddam's failure to comply with UN resolutions; which were designed to REMOVE him as a threat. Iran is under NO such resolutions.
And you will never get one fron the UN, they are useless...but I digress!
Separate names with a comma.