Iran has refused IAEA inspections

Discussion in 'Iran' started by rhodescholar, Jul 26, 2009.

  1. rhodescholar
    Offline

    rhodescholar Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,399
    Thanks Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Strafing Iranian RGs with my .50 Cal
    Ratings:
    +1,733
    To address the question of the IRI's cooperation with the IAEA, I have assembled a list of instances showing that the IRI has continuously refused to allow the UNSC-mandated inspections:

    Diplomats: Iran has means to test bomb in 6 months - Salon.com

    "With the U.N. nuclear agency strictly limited in its nuclear monitoring of Iran, the existence of a hidden enrichment site that could supply the weapons-grade uranium needed for a nuclear weapons test is also possible.

    International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed Elbaradei has repeatedly warned that his agency cannot guarantee that Iran is not hiding nuclear activities. Iranian nuclear expert David Albright on Friday put the chances that such a secret site exists at "50-50."

    Iran, Syria violate UN sanctions banning arms transfer, members say : Middle East World

    "Sawers said Iran had "no plausible civilian use" for most of the centrifuges. "Iran has also refused access to IAEA inspectors to the heavy water reactor at Arak, for the second time in a row," Sawers said. "This is of particular concern because the reactor's design at Arak is ideally suited to producing plutonium, which could be used for nuclear weapons.""

    Iran's Denials of Design Information and Verification: More Cause for International Concern - U.S. Mission to International Organizations in Vienna

    "Iran’s refusal to provide early design information for new nuclear facilities and its denial of inspections at a key facility are cause for international concern for three reasons. First, they continue a trend of Iran increasingly withholding cooperation from the IAEA. Second, they raise further questions about the nature of Iran’s activities and intentions of its leadership. Third, they constitute further violations of Iran’s international obligations.
    New Instances of Iran Withholding Information and Cooperation.

    Iran’s leaders have taken steps that have increasingly limited the effectiveness of IAEA inspections. Iran’s leaders have:

    - stopped implementing the IAEA’s Additional Protocol, a protocol accepted by 112 other countries which provides inspectors enhanced access to information and facilities;
    - denied entrance to Iran for some fifty IAEA inspectors, including senior inspectors with valuable experience and knowledge related to Iran’s nuclear program;
    - refused to permit IAEA interviews of key individuals associated with Iran’s nuclear activities;
    - refused to provide key information about Iran’s relationship to the A.Q. Khan network, an illicit market in nuclear technology;
    - refused to turn over or provide a copy of a fifteen-page document, obtained from the A.Q. Khan network, related to the manufacture of nuclear weapons components; and,
    - refused to address connections between studies on uranium conversion to high explosives testing (an important step in nuclear weapons design) and the design of a missile re-entry vehicle."

    -----------------

    To those with any intelligence whatsoever, these are just a few of the hundreds of sites listing the IRI's refusal to allow the legally required IAEA inspections, which would then preclude their ability to obtain evidence that they are, as most of the World suspects, building nuclear weapons.
     
  2. rhodescholar
    Offline

    rhodescholar Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,399
    Thanks Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Strafing Iranian RGs with my .50 Cal
    Ratings:
    +1,733
    No surprise that all of the trash trying to protect the scum running iran, including the House Idiot in my sig, have avoided this thread like the plague...
     
  3. Mr. Jones
    Offline

    Mr. Jones Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,501
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +161
    Why should Iran be prevented from having nuclear capabilities when Israel has it?
     
  4. rhodescholar
    Offline

    rhodescholar Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,399
    Thanks Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Strafing Iranian RGs with my .50 Cal
    Ratings:
    +1,733
    Since Al Capone robbed people, why can't I?

    What the flying fuck does israel have to do with iran?
     
  5. blu
    Offline

    blu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,836
    Thanks Received:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +774
    both are countries that use their power irresponsibly?
     
  6. rhodescholar
    Offline

    rhodescholar Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,399
    Thanks Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Strafing Iranian RGs with my .50 Cal
    Ratings:
    +1,733
    Is israel directing large terrorist proxy armies that are de-stabilizing FOUR other middle eastern nations?

    Is israel threatening to wipe iran off the map?

    Is israel a democracy accountable to its voters, whereas iran is a military dictatorship with a totally unaccountable government?

    Is israel training, supporting and aiding rocket fire into iran?

    Only a fool could begin to try and compare the 2...
     
  7. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Because Iran signed a treaty - you know, gave their word, made a promise, entered into a treaty.
     
  8. Mr. Jones
    Offline

    Mr. Jones Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,501
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +161
    Israel and their bootlickers are the ones complaining about Irans nuclear capability while neglecting the fact that Israel has nuclear power and weapons. Why should that be?
     
  9. Mr. Jones
    Offline

    Mr. Jones Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,501
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +161
    Which treaty are you referring to?
     
  10. Mr. Jones
    Offline

    Mr. Jones Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,501
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +161
    They should both be allowed to point WMDs at each other. Nothing wrong with that.
     

Share This Page