Iran Could Launch Pre-Emptive Israel Strike

So that means you're okay with it then? :D

Were you okay with the Bush Doctrine?



The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of former United States president George W. Bush. The phrase was first used by Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's "unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol".[1] After 9/11 the phrase described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Different pundits would attribute different meanings to "the Bush Doctrine", as it came to describe other elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests. Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.

The phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration. The expression was used at least once, though, by Vice President Dick Cheney, in a June 2003 speech in which he said, "If there is anyone in the world today who doubts the seriousness of the Bush Doctrine, I would urge that person to consider the fate of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq."



Which part? :D

Both..but most significantly acting unilaterally to conquer a nation that has not attacked us.
 
Were you okay with the Bush Doctrine?



The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of former United States president George W. Bush. The phrase was first used by Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's "unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol".[1] After 9/11 the phrase described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Different pundits would attribute different meanings to "the Bush Doctrine", as it came to describe other elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests. Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.

The phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration. The expression was used at least once, though, by Vice President Dick Cheney, in a June 2003 speech in which he said, "If there is anyone in the world today who doubts the seriousness of the Bush Doctrine, I would urge that person to consider the fate of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq."



Which part? :D

Both..but most significantly acting unilaterally to conquer a nation that has not attacked us.



Iraq was a mistake. As SunniMan would say...And? :cool:
 
The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of former United States president George W. Bush. The phrase was first used by Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's "unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol".[1] After 9/11 the phrase described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Different pundits would attribute different meanings to "the Bush Doctrine", as it came to describe other elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests. Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.

The phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration. The expression was used at least once, though, by Vice President Dick Cheney, in a June 2003 speech in which he said, "If there is anyone in the world today who doubts the seriousness of the Bush Doctrine, I would urge that person to consider the fate of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq."



Which part? :D

Both..but most significantly acting unilaterally to conquer a nation that has not attacked us.



Iraq was a mistake. As SunniMan would say...And? :cool:

It was a mistake with little or no contrition coming from the Republicans and Conservatives in general.

They have your attitude about it.

"And?"
 
Both..but most significantly acting unilaterally to conquer a nation that has not attacked us.



Iraq was a mistake. As SunniMan would say...And? :cool:

It was a mistake with little or no contrition coming from the Republicans and Conservatives in general.

They have your attitude about it.

"And?"



Congress Gives Bush Unilateral Power to Invade Iraq Without UN Approval Or Congress Notice: House Members Dennis Kucinich & Barbara Lee Try to Delay the Vote

http://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/iraq.us/


http://bluemassgroup.com/2007/01/how-the-democrats-voted-on-iraq-in-2002/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution


Just Republicans and Conservatives?

You're a useful idiot but I've had enough fun humiliating you for one morning. :eusa_hand:
 
Last edited:
Could they? Really? Only time will tell. I'm pretty sure that no matter what happens in Nov., a strike on Israel would bring about a massive response that would devastate Iran.
 
A preemptive strike by Iran isn't starting a war.

Only a preemptive strike by Israel is starting a war.
 
Iran is the jackass in the bar talking shit to "try" to scare people from kicking his ass when he really knows he will get beaten to a pulp in a fight.

Iran's best strategy is to wait for an attack on them, strke back and play the victim card in the UN with Russia and China pushing Obamination to punish Israel.

Iran's worse response would be to attack US forces in the region because "Israel" attacked them.
 
Doubt it...

... Iran doesn't yet have the nuclear arsenal to back it up...

... Israel does.
:eusa_shifty:

Your Oh, so right.

If Isreal wanted to they cold turn Iran into a parking lot.

Iran doesn't have the same capability.

Nlot yet anyway. They are working on it.
 
Doubt it...

... Iran doesn't yet have the nuclear arsenal to back it up...

... Israel does.
:eusa_shifty:

Your Oh, so right.

If Isreal wanted to they cold turn Iran into a parking lot.

Iran doesn't have the same capability.

Nlot yet anyway. They are working on it.



Iran will have it soon, if Obama has his way. :mad:

He helps radical extremists every chance he gets.
 

Forum List

Back
Top