Iran Could Launch Pre-Emptive Israel Strike

[beretta304]

"Iran will not start any war but it could launch a pre-emptive attack if it was sure that the enemies are putting the final touches to attack it," Al-Alam said, paraphrasing the military commander.

Iran could launch pre-emptive Israel strike-commander | Reuters

"Strike on Iran would trigger 'World War III': Guards."


Strike on Iran would trigger 'World War III': Guards - FRANCE 24

 

[Sallow]

The mouse that roared.

 

[Lakhota]

Nutanyahoo is an asshole bully.

ISRAELI POLITICAL INSANITY. THE SAMSON OPTION: Israeli Letter-poem to Grass: If We Go, Everyone Goes | Global Research

 

[NYcarbineer]

So Iran is adopting the Bush doctrine?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The mouse that roared.

If you're talking about the op you are spot on. Never ending deer in the headlights

 

[beretta304]

So Iran is adopting the Bush doctrine?

So that means you're okay with it then?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If Obama wins reelection and Iran ATTACKS Israel he won't have ANY choice in the matter. He is against Israel but if Iran attacks first the US is in no matter who is President or who controls Congress.

 

[Dissent]

That's what Israel and the US have been trying to do...get Iran to attack Israel or US interests in the ME and then destroy them and claim you had nothing to do with them attacking you first...not everyone is a blind sheep...the sanctions and tariffs,playing economic war against Iran already..its just a game and I hope Iran won't fall for it.

 

[waltky]

Doubt it...

... Iran doesn't yet have the nuclear arsenal to back it up...

... Israel does.

 

[RoadVirus]

Amuckyjihad better think carefully before he decides to attack Israel.

 

[Sallow]

Doubt it...

... Iran doesn't yet have the nuclear arsenal to back it up...

... Israel does.

Which is basically the fact..Jack.

 

[Sallow]

Amuckyjihad better think carefully before he decides to attack Israel.

Yup.

It would also put an end to Iran's doctrine of not attacking any one..that's been in place for about a century.

 

[JWBooth]

The odds are greater for Israel to act precipitously.

 

[Sallow]

So Iran is adopting the Bush doctrine?

So that means you're okay with it then?

Were you okay with the Bush Doctrine?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

So Iran is adopting the Bush doctrine?

So that means you're okay with it then?

If its O's policy, he's down with it.

 

[beretta304]

So Iran is adopting the Bush doctrine?

So that means you're okay with it then?

Were you okay with the Bush Doctrine?

The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of former United States president George W. Bush. The phrase was first used by Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's "unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol".[1] After 9/11 the phrase described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Different pundits would attribute different meanings to "the Bush Doctrine", as it came to describe other elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests. Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.

The phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration. The expression was used at least once, though, by Vice President Dick Cheney, in a June 2003 speech in which he said, "If there is anyone in the world today who doubts the seriousness of the Bush Doctrine, I would urge that person to consider the fate of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq."



Which part?

 

[Roudy]

"Iran will not start any war but it could launch a pre-emptive attack if it was sure that the enemies are putting the final touches to attack it," Al-Alam said, paraphrasing the military commander.

Iran could launch pre-emptive Israel strike-commander | Reuters

"Strike on Iran would trigger 'World War III': Guards."


Strike on Iran would trigger 'World War III': Guards - FRANCE 24

If only the Iranians would be stupid enough to do such a thing. It would spell suicide for the Islamic republic of Iran as we know it.

 

[beretta304]

Isreal can take care of Iran by itself. There's an armada massed in the ME. Obiedopey doesn't talk about that becuase it won't sit well with his constituency.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So that means you're okay with it then?

Were you okay with the Bush Doctrine?

The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of former United States president George W. Bush. The phrase was first used by Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's "unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol".[1] After 9/11 the phrase described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Different pundits would attribute different meanings to "the Bush Doctrine", as it came to describe other elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests. Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.

The phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration. The expression was used at least once, though, by Vice President Dick Cheney, in a June 2003 speech in which he said, "If there is anyone in the world today who doubts the seriousness of the Bush Doctrine, I would urge that person to consider the fate of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq."



Which part?

Bush justified the attack on on Iraq on the grounds that Iraq had WMD's that represented a current and future threat to the US. Those who supported him supported the same justification.

Iran by that same justification could attack Israel at any time on the grounds that Israel has WMD's that represent a current and future threat to Iran.

The question for those who thought Bush's actions were justified is,

why couldn't Iran's actions be justified on the same grounds?

 

[beretta304]

Were you okay with the Bush Doctrine?

The Bush Doctrine is a phrase used to describe various related foreign policy principles of former United States president George W. Bush. The phrase was first used by Charles Krauthammer in June 2001 to describe the Bush Administration's "unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol".[1] After 9/11 the phrase described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself against countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.

Different pundits would attribute different meanings to "the Bush Doctrine", as it came to describe other elements, including the controversial policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate; a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism; and a willingness to unilaterally pursue U.S. military interests. Some of these policies were codified in a National Security Council text entitled the National Security Strategy of the United States published on September 20, 2002.

The phrase "Bush Doctrine" was rarely used by members of the Bush administration. The expression was used at least once, though, by Vice President Dick Cheney, in a June 2003 speech in which he said, "If there is anyone in the world today who doubts the seriousness of the Bush Doctrine, I would urge that person to consider the fate of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq."



Which part?

Bush justified the attack on on Iraq on the grounds that Iraq had WMD's that represented a current and future threat to the US. Those who supported him supported the same justification.

Iran by that same justification could attack Israel at any time on the grounds that Israel has WMD's that represent a current and future threat to Iran.

The question for those who thought Bush's actions were justified is,

why couldn't Iran's actions be justified on the same grounds?

And who said they couldn't? They may learn a valuable lesson about biting off more than one can chew. Isreal knows what they're dealing with.