International 9/11 poll

Toro

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2005
106,654
41,434
2,250
Surfing the Oceans of Liquidity
22% of the world believes either the US or Israel was behind 9/11. Fortunately, 46% said it was al-Qaeda. If you remove the "don't knows," its 61%.

WPO_911_Sep08_graph.jpg


http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/535.php?nid=&id=&pnt=535&lb=
 
Lt. Col. Jochen Scholz, German Air Force (ret) (Oberstleutnant der Bundesluftwaffe) – Retired German Air Force and NATO officer. Represented Germany in various NATO committees and multi-national organizations. 38-year Air Force career, of which 12 years were in NATO service, and the final 6 years were with the German Federal Ministry of Defense.
Video documentary Unter Falscher Flagge (Under False Flag) 12/07
:

Regarding 9/11: "Ultimate responsibility for the so-called "air policing" and for alarming the interceptor pilots, in NATO terminology an "Alpha Scramble" when the planes go up, lies with the North American Air Defense Command NORAD. It is the largest air defense center in the world watching for external as well as internal threats. It has every single mouse on its radar screen.

Among the NATO nations, it is the general rule that within 10 to 15 minutes of the sounding of an alarm, planes have to be in the air. It was exactly this which did not occur for over two hours. Not one single interceptor plane made the attempt to force the [hijacked] planes down or even to investigate or anything else. A story is told that prior to September 11th, 2001, in the same year more than 60 similar operations [air intercepts] were executed without a hitch.

And the smokescreens which have been put up by the official inquiry committee of the Congress that on this day an unbelievable number of exercises by the Air Force had taken place and so everyone had been confused and not able to tell the difference between real life and exercise. That is simply incomprehensible for someone with a background in air defense. Because exercises, with regard to air traffic control and air defense, are always separated from real life in air traffic."
English subtitled version: nuoviso
Original in German: Nuoviso WebTV

Session of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense of the House of Councilors 1/10/08: In a 40-minute presentation on the floor of the House of Councillors (the upper house of the legislature), Yukihisa Fujita directly questioned the official version of 9/11. Present in the session and responding to Mr. Fujita's questions were Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda and members of his Cabinet.

Mr. Fujita stated that no official police investigation had been conducted into the deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.

He also said that many people worldwide doubt the official account of 9/11 and much evidence has been collected that contradicts the government's version of 9/11, evidence which can be seen on many websites.

During Mr. Fujita's speech, several large photos were sequentially displayed of:
- the alleged path of Flight 77 to the Pentagon
- the Pentagon entry and exit holes and a correctly scaled
overlay of a Boeing 757
- the WTC Twin Towers exploding
- New York firefighter Capt. Dennis Tardio discussing
detonators at the WTC
- the collapse of WTC Building 7


Mr. Fujita demanded further investigation of the events of 9/11.

Video of Mr. Fujita's presentation, including Prime Minister Fukuda's and his Cabinet members' responses, can be seen in three segments at Part 1, Part 2, Part 3

Analysis of the collapse of WTC Building 7, 11/18/05:

"Conclusion: The observed collapse time of WTC 7 was 6.5 seconds. That is only half a second longer than it would have taken for the top of the building to fall to the ground in a vacuum, and half a second shorter than the falling time of an apple when air resistance is taken into account. ... The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition." S A U N A L A H T I › Jää rahaa muuhunkin


Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"WTC Tower 1, 2 and 7 could not have collapsed by fires the way we saw without extra auxiliaries, as for example, explosives. NIST could not have explained the collapses at all and it has left the 'official' explanations to private persons who have failed, too. The last attempt was done by Dr. Seffen from Cambridge University (UK) (9/11 - Dr Keith Seffen's paper - "Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Centre: a Simple Analysis"), but his paper can be debunked to be false." AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 400 Architects and Engineers:
John J. Farmer, Jr., Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission – Former Attorney General of the State of New Jersey. Former Chief Counsel to former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman. Former Commissioner of the State Commission of Investigations. Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey.


Washington Post Article 8/2/06 - "Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate. ...

"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described," John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview. "The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. ... This is not spin. This is not true." http://www.washingtonpost


Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11 Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


Bio: http://www.klng.com/professionals/detail







Peter Rundlet

Peter Rundlet, Counsel for the 9/11 Commission – Former Associate Counsel to President Clinton. Former White House Fellow, serving in the Office of the Chief of Staff to President Clinton. Former Vice President for National Security and International Affairs, Center for American Progress.
Currently Director of Policy and Government Relations for Humanity United, an independent grantmaking organization committed to building a world where modern-day slavery and mass atrocities are no longer possible.
Essay 9/30/06: "A mixture of shock, anger, and sadness overcame me when I read about revelations in Bob Woodward’s new book about a special surprise visit that George Tenet and his counterterrorism chief Cofer Black made to Condi Rice, also on July 10, 2001 ...

If true, it is shocking that the administration failed to heed such an overwhelming alert from the two officials in the best position to know. Many, many questions need to be asked and answered about this revelation — questions that the 9/11 Commission would have asked, had the Commission been told about this significant meeting. Suspiciously, the Commissioners and the staff investigating the administration’s actions prior to 9/11 were never informed of the meeting.

The Commission interviewed Condoleezza Rice privately and during public testimony; it interviewed George Tenet three times privately and during public testimony; and Cofer Black was also interviewed privately and publicly. All of them were obligated to tell the truth. Apparently, none of them described this meeting, the purpose of which clearly was central to the Commission’s investigation. Moreover, document requests to both the White House and to the CIA should have revealed the fact that this meeting took place. Now, more than two years after the release of the Commission’s report, we learn of this meeting from Bob Woodward.

Was it covered up? It is hard to come to a different conclusion. ... At a minimum, the withholding of information about this meeting is an outrage. Very possibly, someone committed a crime. And worst of all, they failed to stop the plot." http://think


Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11 Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


Bio: Changemakers | Open Sourcing Social Solutions
 
Last edited:
Only 22%? I would have actually thought the number of people internationally who felt the US or Israel was behind it would be higher actually.
 
Only 22%? I would have actually thought the number of people internationally who felt the US or Israel was behind it would be higher actually.
but i do wonder who the 7% that think "other" did it

the don't knows are a bit high too
 
NATO, UN ...
almost all the worlds countries we invovled in it.

It hasn't happened again, they really are poor terrorist then if they are not putting terror on us.

If it was a terrorist organization we would have had more attacks. . .

So contrived, yes.
 
japan is a country moron..who engaged in a act of war... not a supposed small group of terrorist from a variety of country's that are our trusted allies
sorry, it is you that is the moron, Al Qaeda is the group that commited an act of war
same as the japanese
:rolleyes:


btw, the only "justice" for 9/11, is the destruction of Al Qaeda and the similar terrorist gruops
 
sorry, it is you that is the moron, Al Qaeda is the group that commited an act of war
same as the japanese
:rolleyes:


btw, the only "justice" for 9/11, is the destruction of Al Qaeda and the similar terrorist gruops

We bring them to trial, we just took over their country and dropped a nuclear bomb on them, so I feel they got what they deserved. But was it really right for us to drop the bomb? That I don't know?
 
We bring them to trial, we just took over their country and dropped a nuclear bomb on them, so I feel they got what they deserved. But was it really right for us to drop the bomb? That I don't know?
exactly, the Japanese got what they deserved, WAR
same thing Al Qaeda is getting
 
yes thats right ..we are all delusional

Peter Rundlet, Counsel for the 9/11 Commission – Former Associate Counsel to President Clinton. Former White House Fellow, serving in the Office of the Chief of Staff to President Clinton. Former Vice President for National Security and International Affairs, Center for American Progress.
Currently Director of Policy and Government Relations for Humanity United, an independent grantmaking organization committed to building a world where modern-day slavery and mass atrocities are no longer possible.
Essay 9/30/06: "A mixture of shock, anger, and sadness overcame me when I read about revelations in Bob Woodward’s new book about a special surprise visit that George Tenet and his counterterrorism chief Cofer Black made to Condi Rice, also on July 10, 2001 ...

If true, it is shocking that the administration failed to heed such an overwhelming alert from the two officials in the best position to know. Many, many questions need to be asked and answered about this revelation — questions that the 9/11 Commission would have asked, had the Commission been told about this significant meeting. Suspiciously, the Commissioners and the staff investigating the administration’s actions prior to 9/11 were never informed of the meeting.

The Commission interviewed Condoleezza Rice privately and during public testimony; it interviewed George Tenet three times privately and during public testimony; and Cofer Black was also interviewed privately and publicly. All of them were obligated to tell the truth. Apparently, none of them described this meeting, the purpose of which clearly was central to the Commission’s investigation. Moreover, document requests to both the White House and to the CIA should have revealed the fact that this meeting took place. Now, more than two years after the release of the Commission’s report, we learn of this meeting from Bob Woodward.

Was it covered up? It is hard to come to a different conclusion. ... At a minimum, the withholding of information about this meeting is an outrage. Very possibly, someone committed a crime. And worst of all, they failed to stop the plot." http://think


Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11 Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


Bio: Changemakers | Open Sourcing Social Solutionsare
 
No one deserves to die. Brain washing caused all those wars and for you to sticking up for them proves that you have been brain washed also.

The entire planet has, war is only designed to limit the population, strike fear in people, take freedoms away and to drain the tax money out of the economy.

It is all a story that you have bought in to. Understand that you have the power to change this. You gave your power to allow this. Stop thinking like programmed robot and start thinking like a person with a brain. Your program tells you to be angry and offended at my statement and call me crazy, a logical thinking person will consider what if it is true. They will figure out by doing nothing they have no power.

EOTS is the only one thinking outside the box but again he is in another box that was designed for him. His efforts are falling blind eyes that rather continue with business as usually instead of using logical thought and using your own power to do something about.

You take the easy road out because it is to hard. When did men stop being a man?
 
DiveCon said:
were the Japanese brought to trial for Pearl Harbor?

japan is a country moron..who engaged in a act of war... not a supposed small group of terrorist from a variety of country's that are our trusted allies

Uh, hello? Is there anybody in there?


International Military Tribunal for the Far East - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia said:
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trial, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal or simply as the Tribunal, was convened to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three types of crimes: "Class A" (crimes against peace), "Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity), committed during World War II. The first refers to their joint conspiracy to start and wage the war, and the latter two refer to atrocities including the Nanking Massacre. War crimes charges against more junior personnel were dealt with separately, in other cities throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
The tribunal convened on May 3, 1946, and was adjourned on November 12, 1948.
Twenty-five Japanese military and political leaders were charged with Class A crimes, and more than 5,700 Japanese nationals were charged with Class B and C crimes, mostly over prisoner abuse. The crimes perpetrated by Japanese troops and authorities in the occupation of Korea and China, particularly Manchuria (Manchukuo), were not part of the proceeding. China held 13 tribunals of its own, resulting in 504 convictions and 149 executions.
 
yes thats right ..we are all delusional

Peter Rundlet, Counsel for the 9/11 Commission – Former Associate Counsel to President Clinton. Former White House Fellow, serving in the Office of the Chief of Staff to President Clinton. Former Vice President for National Security and International Affairs, Center for American Progress.
Currently Director of Policy and Government Relations for Humanity United, an independent grantmaking organization committed to building a world where modern-day slavery and mass atrocities are no longer possible.
Essay 9/30/06: "A mixture of shock, anger, and sadness overcame me when I read about revelations in Bob Woodward’s new book about a special surprise visit that George Tenet and his counterterrorism chief Cofer Black made to Condi Rice, also on July 10, 2001 ...

If true, it is shocking that the administration failed to heed such an overwhelming alert from the two officials in the best position to know. Many, many questions need to be asked and answered about this revelation — questions that the 9/11 Commission would have asked, had the Commission been told about this significant meeting. Suspiciously, the Commissioners and the staff investigating the administration’s actions prior to 9/11 were never informed of the meeting.

The Commission interviewed Condoleezza Rice privately and during public testimony; it interviewed George Tenet three times privately and during public testimony; and Cofer Black was also interviewed privately and publicly. All of them were obligated to tell the truth. Apparently, none of them described this meeting, the purpose of which clearly was central to the Commission’s investigation. Moreover, document requests to both the White House and to the CIA should have revealed the fact that this meeting took place. Now, more than two years after the release of the Commission’s report, we learn of this meeting from Bob Woodward.

Was it covered up? It is hard to come to a different conclusion. ... At a minimum, the withholding of information about this meeting is an outrage. Very possibly, someone committed a crime. And worst of all, they failed to stop the plot." http://think


Editor's note: Despite the many public statements by 9/11 Commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded for lying to the 9/11 Commission.


Bio: Changemakers | Open Sourcing Social Solutionsare
ya know what, i agree that the 9/11 commision was a total waste

of money and time

we already knew what happened, there was nothing to investigate
 
So, what is Al Qaeda... Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan or some of them or all of them, none of them?

What country lays claim to the Taliban?
havent they pretty much been dealt with?
last i knew the Taliban didnt control much of anything anymore
and its leaders have been either killed or captured or they are hiding in caves
 

Forum List

Back
Top