Interesting

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Grace, May 20, 2011.

  1. Grace
    Offline

    Grace BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    5,174
    Thanks Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +742
    Watergate Deaths - Midnight 7/12/76 - StumbleUpon

     
  2. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    R.I.P. Grace :eusa_shhh:
     
  3. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    This is, of course, very interesting

    But...

    One wonders, what standards Grace used to indentify people that she thought were either directly or indirectly involved in the WATERGATE affair?

    Just how large IS that set?

    Is it 1,000 people, 10,000? 100,000? 1,000,000?

    I mean that is sort of the issue, isn't it?

    If one is making a conspiratorial claim based on STATISTICAL inference then one needs to identify total set size , right?
     
  4. Douger
    Offline

    Douger BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,323
    Thanks Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not fucking there !
    Ratings:
    +915
    They're all the same.
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIfbCcsgeUw&feature=related]YouTube - ‪Clinton's Dead Friends‬‏[/ame]
     

Share This Page