interesting dr phil show

actsnoblemartin

I love Andrea & April
Mar 7, 2007
4,042
414
98
San Diego, CA
please direct your comments to the show, not my personal views on gay marriage and please refrain from personal attacks

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WGb4eQRg3Y]YouTube - Dr. Phil - Same-Sex Marriage: Right Or Wrong? - Proposition 8 - Pt 1/4[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-TVGaRgOZo[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srhn0ppaAcw&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srhn0ppaAcw&feature=related[/ame]
 
Last edited:
'never met an ex-black person'

michael-jackson.jpg


:lol:
 
2:40 (video 2)

'Corresponding with 5000 years of history'


The moron needs to go back to school and take a few history classes

So, we've established that the pro-8 crowd on this show consists of delusional, uneducated, bigots...
 
Last edited:
4:10 (video 2)

She's arguing that a people who could not change something about themselves were discriminated against because of that aspect of their personhood- then says that the same argument can't be applied to persons she doesn't like? :eusa_eh:
 
my problem with you is, nobody is allowed to disagree with you, without being called names.

I find that sad

2:40 (video 2)

'Corresponding with 5000 years of history'


The moron needs to go basck to school and take a few history classes

So, we've established that the pro-8 crowd on this show consists of delusional, uneducated, bigots...
 
my problem with you is, nobody is allowed to disagree with you, without being called names.

I find that sad

2:40 (video 2)

'Corresponding with 5000 years of history'


The moron needs to go basck to school and take a few history classes

So, we've established that the pro-8 crowd on this show consists of delusional, uneducated, bigots...

there is no room for disagreement on established historical facts. He is either lying or uninformed. There is no way around that. In either scenario, he should have checked the facts before using false information to argue his case, when dealing with common knowledge matters like historical forms of marriage in Western society and the Middle East.
 
1:30 (video 3)

'you are not born gay'

Is she a psychiatrist? neurologist? psychologist? evolutionary biologist?

What are her qualifications to make that assertion?
 
I cant really argue with you, you believe marriage is a civil right i dont, but since we cant disagree without you calling me names, fuck you too :lol:

j/k, have a good night

2:50 (second video)

Would he have said that to Blacks who lost their rights is bona fide elections when the Jim Crow laws went into effect?
 
well if you have any links for me, ill check them out

my problem with you is, nobody is allowed to disagree with you, without being called names.

I find that sad

2:40 (video 2)

'Corresponding with 5000 years of history'


The moron needs to go basck to school and take a few history classes

So, we've established that the pro-8 crowd on this show consists of delusional, uneducated, bigots...

there is no room for disagreement on established historical facts. He is either lying or uninformed. There is no way around that. In either scenario, he should have checked the facts before using false information to argue his case, when dealing with common knowledge matters like historical forms of marriage in Western society and the Middle East.
 
again, i dont think equating, not having the right to change the definition of marriage with jim crowe.

gays were never slaves, gays never had different drinking fountains, or seperate schools.

2:50 (second video)

Would he have said that to Blacks who lost their rights is bona fide elections when the Jim Crow laws went into effect?
 

Forum List

Back
Top