Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"...the solutions being offered by the White House are a doubling down on the failures of the past. The unprecedented reckless spending that led to the first-ever downgrade of the nations credit rating has been met not with introspection and a new approach, but with calls for more spending."
I happened to come across an article by a political analyst Derek Hunter which reflects my views 100%. I don't recall reading his other articles, but I am looking forward to it. Perhaps you might find his article as interesting as I did. The following is his link:
It's Mourning in America - Derek Hunter - Townhall Conservative
The snag is of course is McCain would have done much of the same things, presidents run the economy from the same playbook, regardless of party affiliation. And presidents may only implement the policies Congress will allow.
The author makes the same mistake as most partisan conservatives in that presidents have little short-term impact on the economy we often dont see the result of a given presidents policies until years, perhaps decades, after those policies are implemented.
Given the severe and comprehensive damage the economy sustained after the December 2007 recession, theres little or nothing Obama could have done to further damage the economy: one cant make a disaster out of a disaster. And any effort to fix such a devastated economy by Obama, McCain, Bush, or Reagan, for that matter - would be utterly futile.
The snag is of course is McCain would have done much of the same things, presidents run the economy from the same playbook, regardless of party affiliation. And presidents may only implement the policies Congress will allow.
The author makes the same mistake as most partisan conservatives in that presidents have little short-term impact on the economy we often dont see the result of a given presidents policies until years, perhaps decades, after those policies are implemented.
Given the severe and comprehensive damage the economy sustained after the December 2007 recession, theres little or nothing Obama could have done to further damage the economy: one cant make a disaster out of a disaster. And any effort to fix such a devastated economy by Obama, McCain, Bush, or Reagan, for that matter - would be utterly futile.
If McCain would have done the same thing why do you support Obama? I thought everyone who voted for him wanted change.
Presidential administrations actually have quite a bit impact on short term economic cycles. it is the long term ones they have difficulty managing. Reagan's policies had enough immediate impact on the economy that he was able to get reelected based on them, and the fact that everyone could see that things were getting better. Obama's, on the other hand, have failed miserably.
"...the solutions being offered by the White House are a doubling down on the failures of the past. The unprecedented reckless spending that led to the first-ever downgrade of the nations credit rating has been met not with introspection and a new approach, but with calls for more spending."
Do you ever think? There is no playbook solution to the fuck up that was George W. Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh.
The snag is of course is McCain would have done much of the same things, presidents run the economy from the same playbook, regardless of party affiliation. And presidents may only implement the policies Congress will allow.
The author makes the same mistake as most partisan conservatives in that presidents have little short-term impact on the economy we often dont see the result of a given presidents policies until years, perhaps decades, after those policies are implemented.
Given the severe and comprehensive damage the economy sustained after the December 2007 recession, theres little or nothing Obama could have done to further damage the economy: one cant make a disaster out of a disaster. And any effort to fix such a devastated economy by Obama, McCain, Bush, or Reagan, for that matter - would be utterly futile.
Most liberals are going to blame Bush and say the stimulus was too small. We need to a lot of research on the liberal gene and find a way to inform the future parents.
"...the solutions being offered by the White House are a doubling down on the failures of the past. The unprecedented reckless spending that led to the first-ever downgrade of the nations credit rating has been met not with introspection and a new approach, but with calls for more spending."
Do you ever think? There is no playbook solution to the fuck up that was George W. Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh.
So Obama had no plan when he ran?
Obama Slams McCain's Economic Policies - YouTube
"...the “solutions” being offered by the White House are a doubling down on the failures of the past. The unprecedented reckless spending that led to the first-ever downgrade of the nation’s credit rating has been met not with introspection and a new approach, but with calls for more spending."
Do you ever think? There is no playbook solution to the fuck up that was George W. Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh.
Wow are you fucking stupid.Do you ever think? There is no playbook solution to the fuck up that was George W. Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh.
So Obama had no plan when he ran?
Obama Slams McCain's Economic Policies - YouTube
Gotta love that revisionist history.
Yes, Obama had an economic plan when he campaigned. But, if you're being honest, you would also talk about how the Financial Crisis didn't hit until the last month of campaigning. Obama was not elected to fix the Financial Crisis, but that's the only thing you guys ever use as a bench mark. Kinda funny in a sad way.
The snag is of course is McCain would have done much of the same things, presidents run the economy from the same playbook, regardless of party affiliation. And presidents may only implement the policies Congress will allow.
The author makes the same mistake as most partisan conservatives in that presidents have little short-term impact on the economy we often dont see the result of a given presidents policies until years, perhaps decades, after those policies are implemented.
Given the severe and comprehensive damage the economy sustained after the December 2007 recession, theres little or nothing Obama could have done to further damage the economy: one cant make a disaster out of a disaster. And any effort to fix such a devastated economy by Obama, McCain, Bush, or Reagan, for that matter - would be utterly futile.
So Obama followed the playbook of Bush ... Got it ... And Clinton was only able to balance the budget because the Pub congress allowed it ... Alright, if you say so
