Intercontinental anti-nuclear missle war heads.

LilOlLady

Gold Member
Apr 20, 2009
10,017
1,312
190
Reno, NV
INTERCONTINENTAL ANTI-NUCLEAR MISSLE WAR HEADS.
I don’t know if that’s the correct terminology.

When are we gong to learn that developing a stockpile of nuclear weapons of mass destruction and attacking every country we believe to be a nuclear threat do not guarantee our safety of not being attacked or stopping countries from developing nuclear weapons. We have spent billions and sacrificed thousands of American lives and still not safe. Will Iran and Pakistan be next since they are a threat? Will we pay Iran to be our friend like we are paying Pakistan?
To guarantee our safety and make any nuclear weapon null and useless we need to put Americans to work building a stockpile of ant-nuclear weapons. Then countries like Iraq would not be a threat no matter how many nuclear weapons they have pointed at us.
But then there would always be a threat from biological weapons. Then we would have to develop a weapon the fight them. Where will all this fighting end? World annihilation? Maybe developing a stockpile of weapons of peace is the answer. I do know WMDs and fighting terrorism where ever it exist is not the answer. We just create more terrorist who are constantly trying to find ways to destroy us.
 
Biggest load of BULLSHIT I've read this morning. Tell Reagan that and the fall of the Iron Curtain.
 
Granny says dat Ammerjabberjob is a sneaky lil' Shiite...
:eusa_eh:
Iran's nuclear program alarms world powers
Wed November 9, 2011 - World powers express concern about a new report on Iran; The British foreign secretary says Iran's actions are counter to regional change; Iran's president says his nation "will not retreat an iota"; The International Atomic Energy Agency report says Iran may be developing a nuclear bomb
World powers expressed alarm Wednesday about a critical report documenting Iran's progress toward making a nuclear bomb, with the British foreign secretary warning that his nation would take strong measures if the Islamic republic did not change direction. In its most detailed report to date on the military dimensions of Iran's nuclear program, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found no evidence that Iran has decided to actually build a bomb. But its nuclear program is more ambitious and structured, and more progress has been made than previously known, the report said.

"The agency has serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program," the report said. "After assessing carefully and critically the extensive information available to it, the agency finds the information to be, overall, credible. The information indicates that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device." British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Britain has extended a hand of reconciliation to Iran again and again. It is time, he said, for Iran to accept. "We are prepared to have further talks, but only if Iran is prepared to engage in serious negotiations about its nuclear program without preconditions," Hague said. "If not, we must continue to increase the pressure and we are considering with our partners a range of additional measures to that effect."

Hague said Iran's actions run counter to the gains made by the Arab Spring, if not worse. "They may threaten to undermine it, bringing about a nuclear arms race in the Middle East or the risk of conflict," he said. According to the report, Iran is believed to have continued weapons research and technology development after 2003, when the intelligence community thought it had stopped. Instead of halting, it seems Iran took a hiatus, although the program has progressed at a more modest pace since then, the report said. Iran has always said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

More Iran's nuclear program alarms world powers - CNN.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top