Indoctrination on Campus

You know, I went through undergrad and graduate school and I never once witnessed this alleged "liberal indoctrination." I am fully aware that academia is filled mostly with leftists and that there is certainly an element of professors who try to push their views on their students from time to time, but in my experience, it is nowhere near the level conservatives like to portray.

actually they push their views 100%!! You will never ever hear conservative or libertarian ideas supported on campus. So, the students don't get an educational at all. You can see how perfectly stupid the liberals are here. Not one is willing to step forward and say something substantive in support of liberalism although all are 100%positive liberalism is correct!! Only brainwashing could cause that.

What you say is nothing more than testimony to how brainwashed you were by them!!
 
Last edited:
LOL

On one hand, its certainly true that most people who work at universities and colleges are highly educated and very intelligent so of course, they're liberals.

OTOH, there is also an ignorant and very backward element at the same place.

Its pretty silly and very paranoid to believe that only liberals are pushing their agenda at universities and colleges.

Look at what is happening at the Air Force Academy ... Education is going by the way side while the crazy fundies are taking over.

Hopefully education and intelligence will win out over superstition and stupidity.
 
aa-Cultural-Marxism-indoctrination-center-ahead-sign-300x295.jpg
RTEmagicC_A-Fund-2-Obama.jpg.jpg


Fighting for Marxist Indoctrination on Campus

October 16, 2012 By Steven Plaut

There is a species of radical Leftist that believes that it is the main purpose of taxpayer-funded universities to engage in indoctrination of students into radical left-wing ideology. Such people believe that the only legitimate form of scholarly research and teaching is to force upon students the ideas and agendas of the radical Left, because only these represent correct thinking.

For such people, the highest form of academic inquiry is to engage in one-sided advocacy. They believe that faculty members at universities should be hired mainly, if not exclusively, on the basis of their devotion to radical leftist ideology. They believe that classrooms should be arenas in which students are immersed into leftist NewThink. They believe that student grades should reflect the extent to which the student toes the ideological line of the radical Left. They believe academic conferences and research forums should be restricted to those who advocate the Left’s political agenda, while non-leftist dissident thought should be suppressed and barred. Most importantly of all, they believe that those who dare to criticize the radical tenured Left should be silenced and demonized.

The totalitarian Left believes that taxpayers are morally obligated to fund the teaching of extremist ideology in the classroom, including by people advocating the demise of those same taxpayers and of their country. It is the job of citizens to sit back passively and pay for the far Left to operate propaganda centers, while the radicals collect their cushy salaries as payment for advocating their anti-Israel agenda. It is the job of universities to criticize (actually to demonize) the state of Israel, the tenured Left insists, just as long as no one is permitted to criticize those critics of Israel.

Nowhere is this ideological extremism so clearly on display as in the Department of Politics at Ben Gurion University (BGU), a pseudo-academic propaganda and indoctrination center disguised as an academic department. It is not the only such department in Israel nor at BGU, but it may well be the worst.

---
Fighting for Marxist Indoctrination on Campus

The most important book anyone can distribute to students on college campuses is Marx & Satan, by Richard Wurmbrand. Wurbrand is the founder of VOM - the greatest ministry in the world today for 3rd world nations inside 10/40 window - only ministry in the world that has christians willing to rescue North Koreans across border, etc.

I have bought these books in bulk before and handed them out. It is imperative our students learn the truth about Karl Marx and his involvment with satanism, the truth about his refusal to support his own family preferring to live off of the generosity of Engels, the truth about his own children commiting suicide along with their mates! The true story of his life, his poetry, his satanic writings is astounding. How the Russians managed to hide the truth about him is a matter of pride for them. Stalin boasted that no one knew the true Karl Marx - his real nature had hidden very well in order to present a completely false version of the man. He had not a drop of concern for the poor in reality. It was all a means to trick the people & enslave them with communism. That is the truth about Marx you'll never get in a liberal classroom unfortunately.

If someone had one million dollars to invest in our turning our nation around and wanted to know where it would be better spent - GOP donation or buy the Marx & Satan books by Wurmbrand with the one million I'd definitely advise the latter. I bought my own books in bulk and payed about 5 dollars a book for them. Once people have their eyes opened to exactly what Marx was up to ( dirt and madness according to his own friends ) they will understand how the communists have infiltrated both parties and how to drive them out. There is no book available today that will give a clearer picture of who Karl Marx was than Wurmbrands book, Marx & Satan. In fact, the book was so effective that it is said to this very day the communists claim no single man did them so much harm as Richard Wurmbrand did. He was a very effective researcher, writer, communicator. We need more Wurmbrands today! - Jeremiah

Wow.

Between this claptrap and American Jihad's stupidity, this thread needs to be moved to the Froot Loop forum. And, you can take dingbat Edward with you.

Seriously, guys, do you really believe all this shit? You must be checking behind every bush for boogey mans. Actually, I guess we should be proud of you for being able to come out from under your bed to sit at your mommy's computer.
 
What is really funny about this terror the rw's have of

THE GREAT LIBERAL INDOCTRINATION CONSPIRACY

is their obvious fear that they are too weak minded to resist our terrible powers.
 
Cultural Warfare

By Jeffrey T. Brown
5/11/13

...


Opponents of the closed culture, however, are portrayed as dim-witted and slow-thinking, motivated by malice rather than wisdom or experience. Those who presume to profess a different faith have earned the privilege of being slandered and defamed by the culture. In this culture, religion and law are hopelessly blurred, so that the tenets of the culture's religion become policy. There are core beliefs which cannot be challenged or limited. Nonbelievers are infidels, and those who convert to conflicting beliefs are apostates.

The dishonest beliefs of the culture are forced into the minds of its children from the earliest age. Indoctrination motivates the educational system as well, which encourages prejudice against those who think differently while encouraging self-congratulation for one's own prejudices and false beliefs. The culture has decided it owns the children and will form them as they should be.

Those who do not adapt themselves to the closed culture are shunned, ostracized, publicly humiliated. They are treated as unworthy of existence alongside the virtuous practitioners of the closed culture. They are labeled the cult's "enemy".

...


When truth is punished, and honesty is condemned, all members of a society are obliged to look clear-eyed at those whom the cult protects, and question why any of us would permit such people to rule us. It is long past time to protect our honorable nation from the soulless culture that seeks its destruction from within. God bless those whose courage is on display in these hearings, both the elected representatives and the witnesses who understand the evil that has been done, and which will be done to them for telling the truth. The dishonesty and vitriol of their detractors could not more clearly illustrate the differences between the cult and the rest of us.

Those who have testified, and who will endure the gauntlet to come, remind us that we can defeat the cult, and that at our core, we are still a nation in which integrity and virtue matter.

Read more: Articles: Cultural Warfare

 
Last edited by a moderator:
AJ is a hoot? I am going to take his argument to Sunday School and use it as part of today's lesson, pointing many social traditionalists, like AJ, do not preach Christ but instead His opposite disguised as Him. Paul had to deal with the AJ's of this time.
 
AJ is a hoot? I am going to take his argument to Sunday School and use it as part of today's lesson, pointing many social traditionalists, like AJ, do not preach Christ but instead His opposite disguised as Him. Paul had to deal with the AJ's of this time.

Snarkey, so Paul is here now? You make sure you show this to the kiddies so they'll know how to deal with the liberal swill...:eusa_pray:
 
Last edited:
Defending Indoctrination as ‘Academic Freedom’

May 13, 2013
By Sara Dogan

:piss2:
Dekmejian.jpg


University administrators are supposed to be the guardians of academic freedom at our institutions of higher education. They are charged with ensuring that faculty are granted the right to teach and students the right to learn. But the response of USC’s provost who defended a professor caught on tape ranting about his radical and extreme views in class shows how school officials can misinterpret and misuse this essential doctrine to allow indoctrinators free reign.

The professor in question, Dr. Richard Dekmejian, is a professor of political science at USC who specializes in national security issues, Middle East studies, terrorism and other related topics. The twenty-minute classroom recording was made in Fall 2012 by USC student Tyler Talgo, who may face consequences for his actions since USC’s Student Code of Conduct strictly prohibits making such recordings—a fact that USC’s provost was sure to note in her statement on the incident.

Even at a leftist bastion such as USC, Professor Dekmejian can be considered an extremist. In a mere twenty minutes of recorded classroom footage, Dekmejian repeatedly hurls insults at every Republican president since Reagan, claiming that they were “lazy” and that they “lied to the American people,” while praising Jimmy Carter for “still going around doing good things.” He also blames Israel for the radicalization of Hamas and claims that Islam deserves praise for its treatment of Jews and Christians.

...

The Dekmejian incident makes the second time in recent months that a USC faculty member has been caught on tape abusing his position to indoctrinate students with leftist diatribes. Rather than concerning themselves with the students who violate school policy to record these indoctrinators, Provost Garrett and USC’s administration would do better to spend their efforts reigning in their out-of-control faculty and re-familiarizing themselves with the true meaning of academic freedom.

In exposing this travesty, Tyler Talgo acted with great courage and performed an important public service.


Defending Indoctrination as ?Academic Freedom? | FrontPage Magazine
 
You know, I went through undergrad and graduate school and I never once witnessed this alleged "liberal indoctrination." I am fully aware that academia is filled mostly with leftists and that there is certainly an element of professors who try to push their views on their students from time to time, but in my experience, it is nowhere near the level conservatives like to portray.

I suspect most of the TROLLS posting about the many problems in education never really had much of an education. (especially in the social sciences and humanities)

Much of their venom against the educated is pretty obviously envy-based.

The quality of their writing suggests their inability to think rationally, or at minimum, their inability to get their thoughts down on paper coherently leads, me to think that communication via text is something that they never had to do make a living.

They are out of the element and it shows to all of us for whom communicating was part of our education AND probably our careers, too.

LOL. It shows even to we knuckledraggers on the factory floor.

I have only take on Poliscience course, and the profesor was rather right wing. And, being a science major, I had no interest in how he thought things ought to be, but looked at policies that were put into effect, how they worked and for whom they worked.

Actually what I do is a good school for judging the political ideas. You change the parameters on a machine, and it works less well, there are no excuse about how things 'oughta be', just someone stating, "hey, you fucked up, put it back to where it was!". Apply the same kind of judgement to our 'Conservative' buddies ideas, and it is pretty obvious how their ideas fare. The changes from 2001 to 2009, compared to the changes from 1993 to 2001, or 2009 to present.

And that is the basis of the 'Conservatives' hatred of higher education and rational thought.
 
Defending Indoctrination as ‘Academic Freedom’

May 13, 2013
By Sara Dogan

:piss2:
Dekmejian.jpg


University administrators are supposed to be the guardians of academic freedom at our institutions of higher education. They are charged with ensuring that faculty are granted the right to teach and students the right to learn. But the response of USC’s provost who defended a professor caught on tape ranting about his radical and extreme views in class shows how school officials can misinterpret and misuse this essential doctrine to allow indoctrinators free reign.

The professor in question, Dr. Richard Dekmejian, is a professor of political science at USC who specializes in national security issues, Middle East studies, terrorism and other related topics. The twenty-minute classroom recording was made in Fall 2012 by USC student Tyler Talgo, who may face consequences for his actions since USC’s Student Code of Conduct strictly prohibits making such recordings—a fact that USC’s provost was sure to note in her statement on the incident.

Even at a leftist bastion such as USC, Professor Dekmejian can be considered an extremist. In a mere twenty minutes of recorded classroom footage, Dekmejian repeatedly hurls insults at every Republican president since Reagan, claiming that they were “lazy” and that they “lied to the American people,” while praising Jimmy Carter for “still going around doing good things.” He also blames Israel for the radicalization of Hamas and claims that Islam deserves praise for its treatment of Jews and Christians.

...

The Dekmejian incident makes the second time in recent months that a USC faculty member has been caught on tape abusing his position to indoctrinate students with leftist diatribes. Rather than concerning themselves with the students who violate school policy to record these indoctrinators, Provost Garrett and USC’s administration would do better to spend their efforts reigning in their out-of-control faculty and re-familiarizing themselves with the true meaning of academic freedom.

In exposing this travesty, Tyler Talgo acted with great courage and performed an important public service.


Defending Indoctrination as ?Academic Freedom? | FrontPage Magazine

I see. Then to you, true academic freedom is the right to shut down anyone whose ideas you don't like. We understand you quite well.
 
Of course, were these people so strenously objecting to people with differant viewpoints than they have really serious, they would get an education, then teach their viewpoint. As I see it, their real problem is that they are far to lazy even to consider such a course.
 
You know, I went through undergrad and graduate school and I never once witnessed this alleged "liberal indoctrination." I am fully aware that academia is filled mostly with leftists and that there is certainly an element of professors who try to push their views on their students from time to time, but in my experience, it is nowhere near the level conservatives like to portray.

actually they push their views 100%!! You will never ever hear conservative or libertarian ideas supported on campus. So, the students don't get an educational at all. You can see how perfectly stupid the liberals are here. Not one is willing to step forward and say something substantive in support of liberalism although all are 100%positive liberalism is correct!! Only brainwashing could cause that.

What you say is nothing more than testimony to how brainwashed you were by them!!

LOL. Well, yes you do see some of those ideas on campus. However, it seems that there are not enough 'Conservatives' or Libertarians ambitious enough to get the education neccessary to teach. Or, more than likely, when they learn logic and rational though, they cease to be 'Conservatives' and Libertarians.
 
AJ is a hoot? I am going to take his argument to Sunday School and use it as part of today's lesson, pointing many social traditionalists, like AJ, do not preach Christ but instead His opposite disguised as Him. Paul had to deal with the AJ's of this time.

You make sure you show this to the kiddies so they'll know how to deal with the liberal swill...
The AJs in our congregations are the enemies of Him who suffered and rose for us all.
 
Defending Indoctrination as ‘Academic Freedom’

May 13, 2013
By Sara Dogan

:piss2:
Dekmejian.jpg


University administrators are supposed to be the guardians of academic freedom at our institutions of higher education. They are charged with ensuring that faculty are granted the right to teach and students the right to learn. But the response of USC’s provost who defended a professor caught on tape ranting about his radical and extreme views in class shows how school officials can misinterpret and misuse this essential doctrine to allow indoctrinators free reign.

The professor in question, Dr. Richard Dekmejian, is a professor of political science at USC who specializes in national security issues, Middle East studies, terrorism and other related topics. The twenty-minute classroom recording was made in Fall 2012 by USC student Tyler Talgo, who may face consequences for his actions since USC’s Student Code of Conduct strictly prohibits making such recordings—a fact that USC’s provost was sure to note in her statement on the incident.

Even at a leftist bastion such as USC, Professor Dekmejian can be considered an extremist. In a mere twenty minutes of recorded classroom footage, Dekmejian repeatedly hurls insults at every Republican president since Reagan, claiming that they were “lazy” and that they “lied to the American people,” while praising Jimmy Carter for “still going around doing good things.” He also blames Israel for the radicalization of Hamas and claims that Islam deserves praise for its treatment of Jews and Christians.

...

The Dekmejian incident makes the second time in recent months that a USC faculty member has been caught on tape abusing his position to indoctrinate students with leftist diatribes. Rather than concerning themselves with the students who violate school policy to record these indoctrinators, Provost Garrett and USC’s administration would do better to spend their efforts reigning in their out-of-control faculty and re-familiarizing themselves with the true meaning of academic freedom.

In exposing this travesty, Tyler Talgo acted with great courage and performed an important public service.


Defending Indoctrination as ?Academic Freedom? | FrontPage Magazine

I see. Then to you, true academic freedom is the right to shut down anyone whose ideas you don't like. We understand you quite well.

Then snarky and you must be looking in a mirror or something because that's what the leftist ilk has done for decades, so fuck off morons...

another 2 4 1...:razz:
 
LOL. It shows even to we knuckledraggers on the factory floor.

I have only take on Poliscience course, and the profesor was rather right wing. And, being a science major, I had no interest in how he thought things ought to be, but looked at policies that were put into effect, how they worked and for whom they worked.

Actually what I do is a good school for judging the political ideas. You change the parameters on a machine, and it works less well, there are no excuse about how things 'oughta be', just someone stating, "hey, you fucked up, put it back to where it was!". Apply the same kind of judgement to our 'Conservative' buddies ideas, and it is pretty obvious how their ideas fare. The changes from 2001 to 2009, compared to the changes from 1993 to 2001, or 2009 to present.

And that is the basis of the 'Conservatives' hatred of higher education and rational thought.

Society isn't a machine where you can change one variable while keeping the others constant. That's why your theory is shit. All your post shows is that you don't understand the slightest thing about science.
 
LOL. Well, yes you do see some of those ideas on campus. However, it seems that there are not enough 'Conservatives' or Libertarians ambitious enough to get the education neccessary to teach. Or, more than likely, when they learn logic and rational though, they cease to be 'Conservatives' and Libertarians.

Precisely the opposite is the case. No conservative or libertarian would ever be granted tenure in a modern university. All the people who have control over the decision are Marxists and communists.

Your claim that you had a right-wing political science professor doesn't pass the laugh test. Such a creature is as plausible as a triangle with four corners or an honest politician.
 
Of course, were these people so strenously objecting to people with differant viewpoints than they have really serious, they would get an education, then teach their viewpoint. As I see it, their real problem is that they are far to lazy even to consider such a course.

They couldn't possibly get tenure if they don't endorse the left-wing orthodoxy, so your claim is obvious horseshit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top