Indisputable Facts 9/11: Quite disturbing information

[x0Maximilian0x]

Please someone who doesn't derail threads discuss this indisputable information anyone can verify with their own research........


9/11 Disturbing and Indisputable Facts:

While learning the indisputable and disturbing facts below...ask yourself if you are experiencing any of the common thought process reactions explained here by Sigmund Freud...

Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.

The subject may use:
simple denial: deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether
minimisation: admit the fact but deny its seriousness (a combination of denial and rationalization)
projection: admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility
Denial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

-------

The "official story" was spoonfed to mass media before either tower even fell. That in istself shows the "official investigation" was done before 9/11 even bagan.

Only 33 minutes after the second tower got hit, and before either tower even fell, was the elaborately written "official story" being aired on who's responsible...was this elaborately written news cast "official story" prewritten before the attacks...

How about the "official investigation" before the elaborately written "official story"...was the "official investigation" done before 9/11 even occured...

I think the answer is quite clear.

-------

Remember the Anthrax attacks which just happen to occur right after 9/11 and targeted Media and Senate...

The white house staff began taking the anti-biotic for anthrax BEFORE the first anthrax attack even occured...

-------

This documentary shows Jerome Hauer being interviewed on 9/11...just happened to be interviewed...let's see who he really is...

It was Jerome Hauer who advised the White House staff to start taking CIPRO, the anti-biotic effective against Anthrax, BEFORE the first anthrax attack even occured...

Jerome Hauer was Commissioner for Office of Emergency Management located in Building 7 or World Trade Center 7...

Jerome Hauer was Bush Administration Insider...

The Office of Emergency Management was located on the 23rd floor of Building 7, or World Trade Center 7 and was also where the Office of Counter Terrorism was...

World Trade Center 7 or Building 7 underwent strange and odd construction renovations just before 9/11...

Some of the strange and odd construction renovations in Building 7 consisted of where only the 23rd floor was reinforced with its floors, walls, windows all being strengthened making it some type of tree fort or sky bunker within sight of the World Trade Center twin towers...

Just before 9/11 it was slipped into the news that a Boeing Passenger Plane was successfully tested, flown with remote control...

This remote control technology of Boeing Passenger Planes was developed for someone in Office of Counter Terrorism to be able to take over a Boeing Passenger Plane, by remote control flying, if it was to be hijacked by terrorists...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVFZu97fWbU&feature=related]9 11 THE BIG CLUE EVERYONE MISSED - YouTube[/ame]

-------

Both the Twin Towers or World Trade Centers 1 & 2 underwent many months of construction renovations before 9/11 and up to the very day of 9/11...

Some of the construction renovations in WTC 1, WTC 2 were in and around the elevator shafts... where all the vertical support columns were located that ran from bedrock to the top floor...

The World Trade Centers even underwent construction renovations directly on the vertical support columns that happened to fail on 9/11...

The construction company that did the many months of construction renovations on the WTC Buildings, some of which were on the vertical support columns that ran from bedrock to the top floor, just happen to of had its CEO appointed by President Bush to the Commission White House Fellows...

The Pentagon too underwent construction renovations before 9/11 and up to the very day of 9/11...

The construction renovations on the Pentagon happened to be exactly on the section of the building involved on 9/11...

The part of the Pentagon involved on 9/11 also just happened to be the only part of the building reinforced for a possible impact...

-------

The many vertical support columns in the World Trade Center buildings, that ran from bedrock to the top floor, were fastened and welded together all the way up...

Not going to get into exactly what type of wireless technology may have been used or exactly whay type of developed explosives may have been used...but...

All these VERTICAL support columns somehow removed themselves fast enough ALL THE WAY DOWN so that if a bowling ball were dropped right beside the top floor at the same time...the top floor still hit the ground almost as fast as the bowling ball would even though the top floor had to work its way ALL THE WAY DOWN through these many VERTICAL support columns that ran from bedrock to the top floor...

-------

There were Israeli Mossad proven to be working in and around the World Trade Center buildings...

There were many Israeli Mossad spies arrested during 9/11 time frame...

Some of the Israeli Mossad spies were proven to be active in the Israeli military and explosive experts...

There were Israeli Mossad even arrested on the very day of 9/11 with evidence of explosives, etc that were held in jail, only to be released by the top of the pyramid scheme...

There were even Israeli Mossad dressed like and posing as Muslims, dancing and taking pictures, that were arrested on 9/11, only to be released by the top of the pyramid scheme...

-------

If you did not experience any of the symptoms of Denial explained by Sigmund Freud at the top of this page, then ask yourself if this fits you at the bottom of this page...

-------

Israel Hires Internet Soldiers to Penetrate American Forums, Chatrooms : Deadline Live With Jack Blood

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A&feature=player_embedded]provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Liability]

All of MaxiPad's contentions are either refutable or laughably dubious.

"Facts" are not mere unsupported (and unsupportable) "claims," 0x MaxiPad x0

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Many people say if 9/11 was an inside job then someone would have come forward by now out the many that must have been involved.

I say not if our government can do things like they do below.

The investigations go like this in American government...here is a perfect example on how investigations get manipulated in U.S. government.

Below are a couple paragraphs from a long article recently in Asian Times.

Senators trapped forever into silence and organized group
http://www.usmessageboard.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=4995194

Asia Times Online :: Asian news and current affairs
"The San Francisco Chronicle newspaper reported that the SEC took the unprecedented step to deputize hundreds, if not even thousands of key stakeholders in the private sector for their investigation. In a statement that was sent to almost all listed companies in the US, the SEC asked the addressed companies to assign senior staff for the investigation, who would be aware of "the sensitive nature" of the case and could be relied on to "exercise appropriate discretion".

In essence, it was about controlling information, not about provision and disclosure of facts. Such a course of action involves compromising consequences. Ruppert: What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown into jail without a hearing if they talk publicly. I have seen this implied threat time after time with federal investigators, intelligence agents, and even members of United States Congress who are bound so tightly by secrecy oaths and agreements that they are not even able to disclose criminal activities inside the government for fear of incarceration."

 

[daws101]

Please someone who doesn't derail threads discuss this indisputable information anyone can verify with their own research........


------------------------------------------------EDITED FOR UNNECESSARY REPETITION ON TWO SEPARATE THREADS!

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

EDITED

You keep lurking behind me while I search for intellectuals to discuss these indisputable facts with...

 

[daws101]

YOU'VE NOT PRESENTED ANY FACTS AT ALL..

WHAT YOU HAVE PRESENTED IS SPECIOUS SPECULATION AND IT IS FAR FROM BEING: Definition of INDISPUTABLE
: not disputable : unquestionable <indisputable proof>
— in·dis·put·able·ness noun
— in·dis·put·ably \-bl&#275;\ adverb
See indisputable defined for English-language learners »
See indisputable defined for kids »
Examples of INDISPUTABLE
<an indisputable fact that is not subject to interpretation
you have no evidence linking the events of your speculation to 911.
in other words there is no proof of cause and effect.

 

[daws101]

EDITED

You keep lurking behind me while I search for intellectuals to discuss these indisputable facts with...

YOU'VE NOT PRESENTED ANY FACTS AT ALL..

WHAT YOU HAVE PRESENTED IS SPECIOUS SPECULATION AND IT IS FAR FROM BEING: Definition of INDISPUTABLE
: not disputable : unquestionable <indisputable proof>
— in·dis·put·able·ness noun
— in·dis·put·ably \-bl&#275;\ adverb
See indisputable defined for English-language learners »
See indisputable defined for kids »
Examples of INDISPUTABLE
<an indisputable fact that is not subject to interpretation
you have no evidence linking the events of your speculation to 911.
in other words there is no proof of cause and effect.

 

[daws101]

EDITED

You keep lurking behind me while I search for intellectuals to discuss these indisputable facts with...

LURKING? AN IMPOSSIBILITY AS I'm LIGHT YEARS AHEAD OF YOU..

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

YOU'VE NOT PRESENTED ANY FACTS AT ALL..

Most of the world knows...except you and a couple others...that these are verifyable facts that anyone with half a brain could research and discover on indisputable sources.

You chose to take the route explained well by Sigmund Freud above...

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

EDITED

You keep lurking behind me while I search for intellectuals to discuss these indisputable facts with...

LURKING? AN IMPOSSIBILITY AS I'm LIGHT YEARS AHEAD OF YOU..

Earth to daws...come back daws....I repeat....Earth to daws COME BACK daws!!!!!

 

[Liability]

YOU'VE NOT PRESENTED ANY FACTS AT ALL..

Most of the world knows...except you and a couple others...that these are verifyable facts that anyone with half a brain could research and discover on indisputable sources.

You chose to take the route explained well by Sigmund Freud above...

No verifiable "facts" were presented by MaxiPad.

End of story.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Lets ask a couple questions shall we?

Assuming one believes the Government planned and carried out the 4 hijackings and the Anthrax attacks the following are questions to ask...

Who did the Government get to hijack the planes and commit suicide for the Government?

It would take longer then 8 months to plan and prepare such attacks, so are you telling us Democrats and Republicans worked together for these attacks? That Clinton AND Bush knew and approved of this plan?

How did the Government get local State and Federal agencies in 3 different locations to lie about the investigations into the plane attacks?

How did the Government get civilian, Local, County, State and federal investigators in 4 locations to lie about the attacks, the identity of the hijackers and the previous history on the hijackers?

As to the History part, how did the Government get Federal, State and local authorities to lie about the known training done before the attacks?

How did the Government get German Government and Civilian authorities to participate in the lies associated with the terrorists that the Government claimed did the attacks?

How did the Government get the passengers on the Pennsylvania flight to attack and cause the crash of their aircraft? You realize they called family and talked to them about the plan right up to the attack, right?

Assuming you will claim the Air Force shot that flight down.... Where are the tapes of the commands given to the pilots to fire? How many air traffic controllers were in on the attack to cover up for this attack? Why has no one noticed any missing air to air missiles from that period of time or were the ground crews in on the attack too?

I have more depending on your answers.

 

[jillian]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

 

[Liability]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

It warrants an instant replay:

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

It kind of hurts to point out the glaringly obvious to another 9/11 twoofer.

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Lets ask a couple questions shall we?

Assuming one believes the Government planned and carried out the 4 hijackings and the Anthrax attacks the following are questions to ask...

Who did the Government get to hijack the planes and commit suicide for the Government?

It would take longer then 8 months to plan and prepare such attacks, so are you telling us Democrats and Republicans worked together for these attacks? That Clinton AND Bush knew and approved of this plan?

How did the Government get local State and Federal agencies in 3 different locations to lie about the investigations into the plane attacks?

How did the Government get civilian, Local, County, State and federal investigators in 4 locations to lie about the attacks, the identity of the hijackers and the previous history on the hijackers?

As to the History part, how did the Government get Federal, State and local authorities to lie about the known training done before the attacks?



I have more depending on your answers.

I have more too for the rest but for now...

Yes the willing terrorists do exist and easy to recruit and perfect scapegoats for bigger plans...

It was proven fact that Israeli Mossad were among the same 9/11 terrorists before 9/11....given that position could easily have set the terrorists up to get on the planes...not saying the Mossad got on the planes with them but guided them to the act of getting on the planes is a very real posibility given their position among the 9/11 terrorists

As for some of the rest...

The investigation example below was actually one aspect of the actual 9/11 investigation which was reported in Asian Times quite recently and was manipulated to keep many people silent...

This shows how it could be easily be done

Many people say if 9/11 was an inside job then someone would have come forward by now out the many that must have been involved.

I say not if our government can do things like they do below.

The investigations go like this in American government...here is a perfect example on how investigations get manipulated in U.S. government.

Below are a couple paragraphs from a long article recently in Asian Times.

Senators trapped forever into silence and organized group
http://www.usmessageboard.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=4995194

Asia Times Online :: Asian news and current affairs
"The San Francisco Chronicle newspaper reported that the SEC took the unprecedented step to deputize hundreds, if not even thousands of key stakeholders in the private sector for their investigation. In a statement that was sent to almost all listed companies in the US, the SEC asked the addressed companies to assign senior staff for the investigation, who would be aware of "the sensitive nature" of the case and could be relied on to "exercise appropriate discretion".

In essence, it was about controlling information, not about provision and disclosure of facts. Such a course of action involves compromising consequences. Ruppert: What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown into jail without a hearing if they talk publicly. I have seen this implied threat time after time with federal investigators, intelligence agents, and even members of United States Congress who are bound so tightly by secrecy oaths and agreements that they are not even able to disclose criminal activities inside the government for fear of incarceration."

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

Didn't people treat Galileo a little bit like that?

The perception of viewing someone as wacky can be related to the theory of relativity except on a human psyche level...

But thanks for your concern.

On the flip side of relativity...poor baby does it hurt so much to experience the common symptoms of denial?

 

[daws101]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

Didn't people treat Gallileo a little bit like that?

The perception of viewing someone as wacky can be related to the theory of relativity except on a human psyche level...

But thanks for your concern.

On the flip side of relativity...poor baby does it hurt so much to experience the common symptoms of denial?

the difference is Galileo had indisputable facts you on the other hand do not, no matter how many times you click the heels of your ruby slippers together..
comparing yourself to Galileo is a common delusion among twoofers !

YOU'VE NOT PRESENTED ANY FACTS AT ALL..

WHAT YOU HAVE PRESENTED IS SPECIOUS SPECULATION AND IT IS FAR FROM BEING: Definition of INDISPUTABLE
: not disputable : unquestionable <indisputable proof>
— in·dis·put·able·ness noun
— in·dis·put·ably \-bl&#275;\ adverb
See indisputable defined for English-language learners »
See indisputable defined for kids »
Examples of INDISPUTABLE
<an indisputable fact that is not subject to interpretation
you have no evidence linking the events of your speculation to 911.
in other words there is no proof of cause and effect.

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

Didn't people treat Gallileo a little bit like that?

The perception of viewing someone as wacky can be related to the theory of relativity except on a human psyche level...

But thanks for your concern.

On the flip side of relativity...poor baby does it hurt so much to experience the common symptoms of denial?

the difference is Galileo had indisputable facts you on the other hand do not, no matter how many times you click the heels of your ruby slippers together..
comparing yourself to Galileo is a common delusion among twoofers !

YOU'VE NOT PRESENTED ANY FACTS AT ALL..

WHAT YOU HAVE PRESENTED IS SPECIOUS SPECULATION AND IT IS FAR FROM BEING: Definition of INDISPUTABLE
: not disputable : unquestionable <indisputable proof>
— in·dis·put·able·ness noun
— in·dis·put·ably \-bl&#275;\ adverb
See indisputable defined for English-language learners »
See indisputable defined for kids »
Examples of INDISPUTABLE
<an indisputable fact that is not subject to interpretation
you have no evidence linking the events of your speculation to 911.
in other words there is no proof of cause and effect.

You are too much in denial to even try and research to verify the facts listed...

Ignorance is also another common thought process you may also have symptoms of...

Ignorance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ignorance can stifle learning, in that a person who falsely believes he or she is knowledgeable will not seek out clarification of his or her beliefs, but rather rely on his or her ignorant position. He or she may also reject valid but contrary information, neither realizing its importance nor understanding it.

 

[candycorn]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

Didn't people treat Galileo a little bit like that?

The perception of viewing someone as wacky can be related to the theory of relativity except on a human psyche level...

But thanks for your concern.

On the flip side of relativity...poor baby does it hurt so much to experience the common symptoms of denial?

You posted the same shit 2 years ago loser boy:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/108380-seriously-cannot-get-over-this-disturbing-9-11-issue-2.html#post2077092

Some people get smarter as they get older. I guess you're the exception.

 

[jillian]

"indisputable" facts have to be "indisputable"

conspiracy theories are eminently disputable.

poor baby. does it hurt much to be so wacky?

Didn't people treat Galileo a little bit like that?

The perception of viewing someone as wacky can be related to the theory of relativity except on a human psyche level...

But thanks for your concern.

On the flip side of relativity...poor baby does it hurt so much to experience the common symptoms of denial?

don't confuse yourself with galileo. what he found was based on evidence. not on surmise, exaggeration and paranoia.

and most definitely do not confuse yourself with einstein, einstein... again, his work was based on scientific method... not neurosis.