Incremental dirt bags

Discussion in 'History' started by Flanders, Mar 19, 2012.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    It occurs to me the American people do not vote against a president because he is a dirt bag. Clinton proved it. The man raped a woman and he was reelected. The thing that troubles me is that Clinton won both terms with a plurality; Hussein won with a majority.

    NOTE: "All the world loves a lover." Ralph Waldo Emerson. One of America’s greatest tragedies was letting the media protect Clinton when he erased the line separating lover from pervert.

    I’m not implying Hussein is a sex pervert à la Bill Clinton. Still, Hussein has been so secretive the public knows very little about his personal history. Bottom line: He alone is responsible for speculation about any perversions he might have been into before he got to the White House; especially during his years of being mentored by known homosexual Frank Marshall Davis. No matter. Republicans would be crazy to use it against him because Clinton demonstrated that sexual deviancy is NOT a roadblock to the presidency. Oddly enough, congressmen, senators, and state officials, are punished whenever they are outed.

    All things considered, I concluded that incrementalism works for dirt bags at the presidential level as well as it works for socialism’s policies. Here’s the thing that is so troubling. Voters went from Clinton to Hussein in less than one generation. Question: How filthy will the next dirt bag be?

    Beating Hussein

    The Republican candidate will not defeat Hussein if he confines his campaign to talking about the economy, unemployment, jobs, and gas prices. As powerful as those topics are, Hussein’s disloyalty must play a prominent role in his list of weaknesses. Remember that Clinton’s loyalty to this country was not challenged in ‘92 or ‘96 although it should have been because he and Hussein are the same when it comes to their loyalty. Both betrayed this country to the International community, but Hussein’s betrayals were more aggressive in foreign and domestic policies.

    Assuming top Republicans do not agree with Hussein’s worldview (a dangerous assumption to be sure), the RNC should be preparing a chronological list of the things Hussein did since he took office. A list comprised of uncomplicated declarative sentences —— no lies, no spin, no speculation, and no rhetoric. Concentrate on the things he did; the bills and executive orders he signed; the regulations he ordered bureaucracies like the EPA to implement. Every foul thing he did should be preceded by the date he did it —— including bowing and scrapping before foreign leaders who hate this country.

    Don’t waste time telling voters the things Hussein said. That crap is easily dismissed as standard campaign rhetoric; Republicans do it, too. Besides, the parasite class has been swallowing Hussein’s garbage since 2008. There is no reason to think they will upchuck this year.

    An accurate list of Hussein’s weaknesses must be widely distributed in order to be effective. Naturally, an accurate list would include items Democrats support. The healthcare bill for one, environmental crapola for another.

    An accurate list would also include items congressional Republicans went along with. Most notably, raising the debt ceiling, stimulus packages, and bailouts. Whoever the Republican candidate happens to be he should have no trouble distancing himself from the things congressional Republicans did —— no trouble if he is a true conservative.

    My point: Don’t detail Hussein’s disasters with an eye towards winning over his hardcore base.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2012
  2. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,432
    Thanks Received:
    12,698
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,887
    Scary MUSLIM Black Man!!!
     
  3. Dragon
    Offline

    Dragon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    5,481
    Thanks Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +579
    Rule of thumb: when someone exhibits a complete disconnect with reality, ignore.
     
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    To Ravi: Clinton was black but he was not a Muslim!

    To Dragon: I should take your advice and ignore you. Nevertheless, anyone who reads this thread can view the video and decide for themself who is disconnected from reality:

    HILLARY THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK 2 WEEKS AFTER RAPE - YouTube
     
  5. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Clinton never raped anyone.
     
  6. Dragon
    Offline

    Dragon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    5,481
    Thanks Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +579
    Exactly. Or at least, there is no evidence that he did.
     
  7. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    To Sallow: Yeah, right! And Hillary, who now speaks for the women of the world, was never in charge of bimbo eruptions.

    To Dragon: Other than the fact Juanita Broaddrick never lied while Clinton is an admitted liar.

    Incidentally, Clinton raped her twice. The sound quality in the following video is not the best, but the message is clear:


    Shays Shocker: Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice - YouTube
     
  8. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    started right off with a lie didnt you OP
     
  9. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    To Truthmatters: Be precise if you can.

    And do you really want to defend Clinton or Hussein by calling somebody else a liar? Clinton’s lies are well-documented, but minor compared to the lies Hussein tells:


    The Lies of Obama
    Posted by John Ellis on Jan 21st, 2010

    The Lies of Obama | FrontPage Magazine

    Read the entire article to see a long list of lies Hussein told during the campaign and in his first year in office. The scary part is that he added two more years of lies since January 2010.

    Surely, Hussein’s supporters know that the man is an unrepentant liar. It does not matter to them just as the lies the Clintons told did not matter to their supporters. So let me repeat: “Don’t waste time telling voters the things Hussein said.” His lies make satisfying reading, but they will not dissuade one Democrat from voting for him.
     
  10. NLT
    Offline

    NLT Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    25,345
    Thanks Received:
    5,748
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +21,101
    Not being convicted of rape, does not mean said rape did not happen. just saying.
     

Share This Page