In their own words....

[westwall]

I love this particular interplay. Also please note that one of their own states there has been NO WARMING SINCE 1998.

Read it and weep old fraud, toober, konrad et all

Also for those who would like to read what was actually released (not stolen) from the CRU the website below has all of the emails in question in a searchable format. Very interesting reading.


http://www.eastangliaemails.com/index.php




From: Kevin Trenberth <[email protected]>
To: Michael Mann <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: BBC U-turn on climate
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:57:37 -0600
Cc: Stephen H Schneider <[email protected]>, Myles Allen <[email protected]>, peter stott <[email protected]>, "Philip D. Jones" <[email protected]>, Benjamin Santer <[email protected]>, Tom Wigley <[email protected]>, Thomas R Karl <[email protected]>, Gavin Schmidt <[email protected]>, James Hansen <[email protected]>, Michael Oppenheimer <[email protected]>

Hi all
Well I have my own article on where the heck is global warming? We are asking that here in
Boulder where we have broken records the past two days for the coldest days on record. We
had 4 inches of snow. The high the last 2 days was below 30F and the normal is 69F, and it
smashed the previous records for these days by 10F. The low was about 18F and also a
record low, well below the previous record low. This is January weather (see the Rockies
baseball playoff game was canceled on saturday and then played last night in below freezing
weather).
Trenberth, K. E., 2009: An imperative for climate change planning: tracking Earth's global
energy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 19-27,
doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2009.06.001. [1][PDF] (A PDF of the published version can be obtained
from the author.)
The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a
travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008
shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing
system is inadequate.
That said there is a LOT of nonsense about the PDO. People like CPC are tracking PDO on a
monthly basis but it is highly correlated with ENSO. Most of what they are seeing is the
change in ENSO not real PDO. It surely isn't decadal. The PDO is already reversing with
the switch to El Nino. The PDO index became positive in September for first time since
Sept 2007. see
[2]http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/GODAS/ocean_briefing_gif/global_ocean_monitoring_c
urrent.ppt
Kevin
Michael Mann wrote:

extremely disappointing to see something like this appear on BBC. its particularly odd,
since climate is usually Richard Black's beat at BBC (and he does a great job). from
what I can tell, this guy was formerly a weather person at the Met Office.

We may do something about this on RealClimate, but meanwhile it might be appropriate for
the Met Office to have a say about this, I might ask Richard Black what's up here?

mike

On Oct 12, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Stephen H Schneider wrote:

Hi all. Any of you want to explain decadal natural variability and signal to noise and
sampling errors to this new "IPCC Lead Author" from the BBC? As we enter an El Nino year
and as soon, as the sunspots get over their temporary--presumed--vacation worth a few
tenths of a Watt per meter squared reduced forcing, there will likely be another dramatic
upward spike like 1992-2000. I heard someone--Mike Schlesinger maybe??--was willing to bet
alot of money on it happening in next 5 years?? Meanwhile the past 10 years of global mean
temperature trend stasis still saw what, 9 of the warmest in reconstructed 1000 year record
and Greenland and the sea ice of the North in big retreat?? Some of you observational folks
probably do need to straighten this out as my student suggests below. Such "fun", Cheers,
Steve
Stephen H. Schneider
Melvin and Joan Lane Professor for Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies,
Professor, Department of Biology and
Senior Fellow, Woods Institute for the Environment
Mailing address:
Yang & Yamazaki Environment & Energy Building - MC 4205
473 Via Ortega
Ph: 650 725 9978
F: 650 725 4387
Websites: climatechange.net
patientfromhell.org
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Narasimha D. Rao" <[3][email protected]>
To: "Stephen H Schneider" <[4][email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:25:53 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: BBC U-turn on climate
Steve,
You may be aware of this already. Paul Hudson, BBC's reporter on climate change, on Friday
wrote that there's been no warming since 1998, and that pacific oscillations will force
cooling for the next 20-30 years. It is not outrageously biased in presentation as are
other skeptics' views.


[5]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8299079.stm
[6]http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100013173/the-bbcs-amazing-u-turn-on-cl
imate-change/


BBC has significant influence on public opinion outside the US.


Do you think this merits an op-ed response in the BBC from a scientist?


Narasimha


-------------------------------
PhD Candidate,
Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources (E-IPER)
Stanford University
Tel: 415-812-7560


--
Michael E. Mann
Professor
Director, Earth System Science Center (ESSC)
Department of Meteorology Phone: (814) 863-4075
503 Walker Building FAX: (814) 865-3663
The Pennsylvania State University email: [7][email protected]
University Park, PA 16802-5013
website: [8]http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/Mann/index.html
"Dire Predictions" book site:
[9]http://www.essc.psu.edu/essc_web/news/DirePredictions/index.html

--
****************
Kevin E. Trenberth e-mail: [10][email protected]
Climate Analysis Section, [11]www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/trenbert.html
NCAR
P. O. Box 3000, (303) 497 1318
Boulder, CO 80307 (303) 497 1333 (fax)

Street address: 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305

References

1. http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/trenberth.papers/EnergyDiagnostics09final.pdf
2. http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/GODAS/ocean_briefing_gif/global_ocean_monitoring_current.ppt
3. mailto:[email protected]
4. mailto:[email protected]
5. BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | What happened to global warming?
6. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/d...73/the-bbcs-amazing-u-turn-on-climate-change/
7. mailto:[email protected]
8. Michael E. Mann
9. ESSC: Earth System Science Center - News and Events
10. mailto:[email protected]
11. CGD's Climate Analysis Section (CAS)

 

[Oddball]

Yeah...Been posted already.

Apparently, our warmist moonbat chorus needs to 'splain to Trenberth that there's a difference between climate and weather.

 

[westwall]

Yeah Dude,

I know but old fraud likes to repost things so I figured we might as well too!

Yeah...Been posted already.

Apparently, our warmist moonbat chorus needs to 'splain to Trenberth that there's a difference between climate and weather.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yep, and all of the above have been exonerated on all charges.

And all of the Scientific Societies, all of the National Academies of Science, and all of the major Universities state that AGW is real.

But we must believe that kooks on a Conservative message board are so much smarter.

 

[elvis]

Yep, and all of the above have been exonerated on all charges.

And all of the Scientific Societies, all of the National Academies of Science, and all of the major Universities state that AGW is real.

But we must believe that kooks on a Conservative message board are so much smarter.

so was OJ.

 

[gslack]

Yep, and all of the above have been exonerated on all charges.

And all of the Scientific Societies, all of the National Academies of Science, and all of the major Universities state that AGW is real.

But we must believe that kooks on a Conservative message board are so much smarter.

Still trying to sell that lie huh? Want me to go and dig up the thread where you claimed this before? Got made a fool of as I recall.....

So tell us who exonerated them? LOL

 

[westwall]

Yep, and all of the above have been exonerated on all charges.

And all of the Scientific Societies, all of the National Academies of Science, and all of the major Universities state that AGW is real.

But we must believe that kooks on a Conservative message board are so much smarter.[/QUOTE]




Welllllll.......not exactly. If you actually read the NAS report they find Mann's work to be fraudulent....they just used soft language to do so. And the british hearing was mocked by a AGW proponent who realises that by whitewashing the matter they bring more attention to the perpetrator Jones and further destroy whatever credibility that they may have had.

Then there's the Harvard scientist who is reeeeeaallly pissed at the fraud that these guy's are pulling.....yep they've been exonerated allright.


Maintenance