Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The fact is this, Samson, the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa disagrees with you.
The case is over, and I personally agree with the finding.
I bet the Iowa SCOTUS did not ask your opinion. They did not ask mine.
*shrugs* Means nothing.She wasn't fired for being female. She was fired because her boss was attracted to her in an unhealthy fashion.She was fired for being female. She has a case. Its gender discrimination, because we know for a fact that she wouldn't have been fired if she were male.
Key word is "her."
Since boss would not be attracted to a male, then he discriminated against an employee based on their gender.
Immaterial because if his wife told him "no, choose", and the assistant was a male, he would have acted the same way.
Key word is "her."
Since boss would not be attracted to a male, then he discriminated against an employee based on their gender.
Sadly we won't know.
What we know are facts:
He is attracted to FEMALES.
He Fired A FEMALE because SHE was FEMALE.
The fact is this, Samson, the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa disagrees with you.
The case is over, and I personally agree with the finding.
I bet the Iowa SCOTUS did not ask your opinion. They did not ask mine.
The Federal case will be interesting.
....like Prop 8.
The fact is this, Samson, the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa disagrees with you.
The case is over, and I personally agree with the finding.
I bet the Iowa SCOTUS did not ask your opinion. They did not ask mine.
The Federal case will be interesting.
....like Prop 8.
There will bo no federal case.
Immaterial because if his wife told him "no, choose", and the assistant was a male, he would have acted the same way.
Sadly we won't know.
What we know are facts:
He is attracted to FEMALES.
He Fired A FEMALE because SHE was FEMALE.
You point out a great case for discrimination if he fired all the females. He didn't so you don't.
Sex discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because of that persons sex.
The fact is this, Samson, the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa disagrees with you.
The case is over, and I personally agree with the finding.
I bet the Iowa SCOTUS did not ask your opinion. They did not ask mine.
The Federal case will be interesting.
....like Prop 8.
There will bo no federal case.
An employer should be able to terminate an employee's employment at any time for any reason they choose.
Yes, I agree. Just as an employee can leave their jobs any time and for any reason they wish.
I have found, however, that being fired for being considered too *hawt* ( a threat ) to be around a male employer, happens frequently, when an insecure wife of said employer meets you.
Better doors often open, though. One often chooses self-employment.
The Federal case will be interesting.
....like Prop 8.
There will bo no federal case.
No?
Why because the EEOC has never sued in Iowa before?
EEOC Sues City of Boone, Iowa* For Age Discrimination
