In case you wanted to know what an entitled millennial looks like, watch this interview of one...

[HenryBHough]

Amazing.

I had not previously seen a still photograph let alone a video of a talking turd.

 

[BrokeLoser]

You sound pretty matter of fact...I’m curious...what percentage of the rich “take” their wealth and what percentage EARN their wealth?

First they earned their wealth, and then the system put in place allowed them to take more.

Sounds interesting...Explain that process in detail, would you?

Oh well that’s easy. They get plenty of tax credits the poor do not and if they own major corporations they even get subsidies to their business which of course leads to a higher salary.

Hold on a minute...so they get tax credits which allow them to keep more of the cash they created and earned?
How can the poor get tax credits when their effective tax rate is 0%?
These corp subsidies you speak of....explain these subsidies in detail...would you?

You can support the philosophy of “keeping one’s money”, but in comparison to the middle class or poor, you keep a higher percentage of you’re rich. Mortgage, charity, and capital gains tax advantages are at a higher percentage among the wealthy. So for instance, if a middle class/poor person donates $1000 to charity, they get back $100. If a rich person donates the same amount of money, they get $350 back. This is only made worse by these expenses having to be itemized. Lower income charitable donations per year are usually too small so they can’t be itemized. When it comes to a mortgage, a rich person again gets a bigger write off for the same amount of money given by a person in the middle class. Now as for poor people taking advantage of tax refunds, it’s completely stupid to say they get all the money back. What they get is a fraction of that. It’s not like a person making 20k per year gets 3k back in taxes. They get a couple hundred if that.

“According to a study by The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, mortgage interest deductions for households with incomes between $40,000 and $75,000 average just $523, while households with incomes above $250,000 enjoy an average write-off of $5,459, or more than 10 times as much.“



You catching on yet?

Wow...your understanding of tax code, percentages and ‘brackets’ is disturbing.

You catching on yet?

 

[Clementine]

Seeing that the rich have taken nearly all the wealth and making it next to impossible to afford to move out of the household. Well, I blame the fuckkng rich pigs for making this all too possible.

You sound pretty matter of fact...I’m curious...what percentage of the rich “take” their wealth and what percentage EARN their wealth?

Don't you know that liberals are the only ones entitled to their money, and other people's money.

Where did Al Gore get all his money? Global warming "solutions" scheme?

Government is the only thing that actually takes money against our will. Government also taxes the crap out of things we need and want.

Funny how so many congress members become wealthy while in office while constantly bitching that they should be paid more.

Liberals don't admit that people get wealthy because they come up with innovative ideas and start businesses.

The Federal Reserve banks are super wealthy but no liberal wants to take them down. George Soros "earned" his money in a sleazy way but they love him. Hollywood people are super wealthy but the liberals love most of them.

I want to know what wealthy people they hate and why. Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry and many other Dems are wealthy but they don't get bad mouthed. Clintons are incredibly wealthy and their charity gives so little.

Liberals are hypocrites.

 

[Billy000]

First they earned their wealth, and then the system put in place allowed them to take more.

Sounds interesting...Explain that process in detail, would you?

Oh well that’s easy. They get plenty of tax credits the poor do not and if they own major corporations they even get subsidies to their business which of course leads to a higher salary.

Hold on a minute...so they get tax credits which allow them to keep more of the cash they created and earned?
How can the poor get tax credits when their effective tax rate is 0%?
These corp subsidies you speak of....explain these subsidies in detail...would you?

You can support the philosophy of “keeping one’s money”, but in comparison to the middle class or poor, you keep a higher percentage of you’re rich. Mortgage, charity, and capital gains tax advantages are at a higher percentage among the wealthy. So for instance, if a middle class/poor person donates $1000 to charity, they get back $100. If a rich person donates the same amount of money, they get $350 back. This is only made worse by these expenses having to be itemized. Lower income charitable donations per year are usually too small so they can’t be itemized. When it comes to a mortgage, a rich person again gets a bigger write off for the same amount of money given by a person in the middle class. Now as for poor people taking advantage of tax refunds, it’s completely stupid to say they get all the money back. What they get is a fraction of that. It’s not like a person making 20k per year gets 3k back in taxes. They get a couple hundred if that.

“According to a study by The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, mortgage interest deductions for households with incomes between $40,000 and $75,000 average just $523, while households with incomes above $250,000 enjoy an average write-off of $5,459, or more than 10 times as much.“



You catching on yet?

Wow...your understanding of tax code, percentages and ‘brackets’ is disturbing.

You catching on yet?

Lol you are such an idiot. The official tax rate of 40% for a rich person means complete dick because of the variety of loopholes and write offs available to them in comparison to the middle class and poor. Apparently you didn’t even read my post. Capital gains write offs alone net rich people a lot more than what they paid in total for the year.

 

[jon_berzerk]

A sample of 1, you fail at analytics.

He self identifies as a conservative

some dudes "self identify" as a chick

doesn't make them one

 

[BrokeLoser]

Sounds interesting...Explain that process in detail, would you?

Oh well that’s easy. They get plenty of tax credits the poor do not and if they own major corporations they even get subsidies to their business which of course leads to a higher salary.

Hold on a minute...so they get tax credits which allow them to keep more of the cash they created and earned?
How can the poor get tax credits when their effective tax rate is 0%?
These corp subsidies you speak of....explain these subsidies in detail...would you?

You can support the philosophy of “keeping one’s money”, but in comparison to the middle class or poor, you keep a higher percentage of you’re rich. Mortgage, charity, and capital gains tax advantages are at a higher percentage among the wealthy. So for instance, if a middle class/poor person donates $1000 to charity, they get back $100. If a rich person donates the same amount of money, they get $350 back. This is only made worse by these expenses having to be itemized. Lower income charitable donations per year are usually too small so they can’t be itemized. When it comes to a mortgage, a rich person again gets a bigger write off for the same amount of money given by a person in the middle class. Now as for poor people taking advantage of tax refunds, it’s completely stupid to say they get all the money back. What they get is a fraction of that. It’s not like a person making 20k per year gets 3k back in taxes. They get a couple hundred if that.

“According to a study by The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, mortgage interest deductions for households with incomes between $40,000 and $75,000 average just $523, while households with incomes above $250,000 enjoy an average write-off of $5,459, or more than 10 times as much.“



You catching on yet?

Wow...your understanding of tax code, percentages and ‘brackets’ is disturbing.

You catching on yet?

Lol you are such an idiot. The official tax rate of 40% for a rich person means complete dick because of the variety of loopholes and write offs available to them in comparison to the middle class and poor. Apparently you didn’t even read my post. Capital gains write offs alone net rich people a lot more than what they paid in total for the year.

So you hate the parts of U.S. tax code that may encourage and or reward financial success, home ownership, business development...etc?
Why do always want to reward the undeserving and fuck over deserving achievers...you know, those paying your way and nearly all the taxes?

 

[Billy000]

Oh well that’s easy. They get plenty of tax credits the poor do not and if they own major corporations they even get subsidies to their business which of course leads to a higher salary.

Hold on a minute...so they get tax credits which allow them to keep more of the cash they created and earned?
How can the poor get tax credits when their effective tax rate is 0%?
These corp subsidies you speak of....explain these subsidies in detail...would you?

You can support the philosophy of “keeping one’s money”, but in comparison to the middle class or poor, you keep a higher percentage of you’re rich. Mortgage, charity, and capital gains tax advantages are at a higher percentage among the wealthy. So for instance, if a middle class/poor person donates $1000 to charity, they get back $100. If a rich person donates the same amount of money, they get $350 back. This is only made worse by these expenses having to be itemized. Lower income charitable donations per year are usually too small so they can’t be itemized. When it comes to a mortgage, a rich person again gets a bigger write off for the same amount of money given by a person in the middle class. Now as for poor people taking advantage of tax refunds, it’s completely stupid to say they get all the money back. What they get is a fraction of that. It’s not like a person making 20k per year gets 3k back in taxes. They get a couple hundred if that.

“According to a study by The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, mortgage interest deductions for households with incomes between $40,000 and $75,000 average just $523, while households with incomes above $250,000 enjoy an average write-off of $5,459, or more than 10 times as much.“



You catching on yet?

Wow...your understanding of tax code, percentages and ‘brackets’ is disturbing.

You catching on yet?

Lol you are such an idiot. The official tax rate of 40% for a rich person means complete dick because of the variety of loopholes and write offs available to them in comparison to the middle class and poor. Apparently you didn’t even read my post. Capital gains write offs alone net rich people a lot more than what they paid in total for the year.

So you hate the parts of U.S. tax code that may encourage and or reward financial success, home ownership, business development...etc?
Why do always want to reward the undeserving and fuck over deserving achievers...you know, those paying your way and nearly all the taxes?

Well overall rich people pay dick in proportion to that of poor and middle class people and that’s the point. Why is it such an alien concept to you that if a person has a higher income, they pay more in taxes? It’s not a question of ethics as to why they pay more - it just economically makes more sense they have to pay more because of the enormous expense the government spends per year. Oh and a lot of that tax revenue goes to corporate subsidies. You cool with that, homie?

 

[Oldstyle]

Seeing that the rich have taken nearly all the wealth and making it next to impossible to afford to move out of the household. Well, I blame the fuckkng rich pigs for making this all too possible.

Let me guess...you're one of those silly people who think there is a finite amount of "wealth" and if someone else has some it means there isn't any for you? Off the rich pigs, Jessica? Isn't that the old rallying cry of the left?

 

[Oldstyle]

Hold on a minute...so they get tax credits which allow them to keep more of the cash they created and earned?
How can the poor get tax credits when their effective tax rate is 0%?
These corp subsidies you speak of....explain these subsidies in detail...would you?

You can support the philosophy of “keeping one’s money”, but in comparison to the middle class or poor, you keep a higher percentage of you’re rich. Mortgage, charity, and capital gains tax advantages are at a higher percentage among the wealthy. So for instance, if a middle class/poor person donates $1000 to charity, they get back $100. If a rich person donates the same amount of money, they get $350 back. This is only made worse by these expenses having to be itemized. Lower income charitable donations per year are usually too small so they can’t be itemized. When it comes to a mortgage, a rich person again gets a bigger write off for the same amount of money given by a person in the middle class. Now as for poor people taking advantage of tax refunds, it’s completely stupid to say they get all the money back. What they get is a fraction of that. It’s not like a person making 20k per year gets 3k back in taxes. They get a couple hundred if that.

“According to a study by The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, mortgage interest deductions for households with incomes between $40,000 and $75,000 average just $523, while households with incomes above $250,000 enjoy an average write-off of $5,459, or more than 10 times as much.“



You catching on yet?

Wow...your understanding of tax code, percentages and ‘brackets’ is disturbing.

You catching on yet?

Lol you are such an idiot. The official tax rate of 40% for a rich person means complete dick because of the variety of loopholes and write offs available to them in comparison to the middle class and poor. Apparently you didn’t even read my post. Capital gains write offs alone net rich people a lot more than what they paid in total for the year.

So you hate the parts of U.S. tax code that may encourage and or reward financial success, home ownership, business development...etc?
Why do always want to reward the undeserving and fuck over deserving achievers...you know, those paying your way and nearly all the taxes?

Well overall rich people pay dick in proportion to that of poor and middle class people and that’s the point. Why is it such an alien concept to you that if a person has a higher income, they pay more in taxes? It’s not a question of ethics as to why they pay more - it just economically makes more sense they have to pay more because of the enormous expense the government spends per year. Oh and a lot of that tax revenue goes to corporate subsidies. You cool with that, homie?

Rich people pay less in taxes than poor people? You honestly believe that?

 

[Coyote]

I self identify as The Emperor of the Western Hemisphere.

Ok...but do you wear clothes?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Hold on a minute...so they get tax credits which allow them to keep more of the cash they created and earned?
How can the poor get tax credits when their effective tax rate is 0%?
These corp subsidies you speak of....explain these subsidies in detail...would you?

You can support the philosophy of “keeping one’s money”, but in comparison to the middle class or poor, you keep a higher percentage of you’re rich. Mortgage, charity, and capital gains tax advantages are at a higher percentage among the wealthy. So for instance, if a middle class/poor person donates $1000 to charity, they get back $100. If a rich person donates the same amount of money, they get $350 back. This is only made worse by these expenses having to be itemized. Lower income charitable donations per year are usually too small so they can’t be itemized. When it comes to a mortgage, a rich person again gets a bigger write off for the same amount of money given by a person in the middle class. Now as for poor people taking advantage of tax refunds, it’s completely stupid to say they get all the money back. What they get is a fraction of that. It’s not like a person making 20k per year gets 3k back in taxes. They get a couple hundred if that.

“According to a study by The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, mortgage interest deductions for households with incomes between $40,000 and $75,000 average just $523, while households with incomes above $250,000 enjoy an average write-off of $5,459, or more than 10 times as much.“



You catching on yet?

Wow...your understanding of tax code, percentages and ‘brackets’ is disturbing.

You catching on yet?

Lol you are such an idiot. The official tax rate of 40% for a rich person means complete dick because of the variety of loopholes and write offs available to them in comparison to the middle class and poor. Apparently you didn’t even read my post. Capital gains write offs alone net rich people a lot more than what they paid in total for the year.

So you hate the parts of U.S. tax code that may encourage and or reward financial success, home ownership, business development...etc?
Why do always want to reward the undeserving and fuck over deserving achievers...you know, those paying your way and nearly all the taxes?

Well overall rich people pay dick in proportion to that of poor and middle class people and that’s the point. Why is it such an alien concept to you that if a person has a higher income, they pay more in taxes? It’s not a question of ethics as to why they pay more - it just economically makes more sense they have to pay more because of the enormous expense the government spends per year. Oh and a lot of that tax revenue goes to corporate subsidies. You cool with that, homie?

Why is it such an alien concept to you that deductions taken by wealthy people amount to more than those deductions taken by the poor?
Again, explain these corp subsidies you keep throwing around.
OMB: Top 20% pay 95% of taxes, middle class 'single digits'

 

[Coyote]

I heard about this guy in another article...and laughed like hell...he has the makings of a good con man

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Seeing that the rich have taken nearly all the wealth and making it next to impossible to afford to move out of the household. Well, I blame the fuckkng rich pigs for making this all too possible.

You sound pretty matter of fact...I’m curious...what percentage of the rich “take” their wealth and what percentage EARN their wealth?

First they earned their wealth, and then the system put in place allowed them to take more.

How is your mother's basement ? I think she might need to turn up the heat to unfreeze your malfunctioning brain.

 

[blackhawk]

SSDD.

 

[MisterBeale]

Seeing that the rich have taken nearly all the wealth and making it next to impossible to afford to move out of the household. Well, I blame the fuckkng rich pigs for making this all too possible.

I get what you are saying.

The Baby Boomers don't really understand how they screwed over Gen X and the millennials, they are all sort of ignorant.

They have pretty big investment portfolio's, and houses paid off from when there were no real global competitors to the US. Then they used the wealth of the nation and squandered it and mismanaged it, leaving the nation with a crushing debt and a mismanaged economy.

Yet they sit there on their high horses, enjoying their retirement while the younger generations struggle to survive. They don't have any clue how easy they had it, and how different the nation really was in their youth and prime working years.

It really is sad.



You must never forgot though, things are worse in other nations. Don't ever believe the propaganda that more government will solve the problem. That is how this nation got into the problem in the first place.

If you have a job, never stop looking for a better one. Always continue to update your skills. Pay off all your debts, and never, ever use a credit card.

7 ways life is harder for millennials than it was for their parents

5 Ways Baby Boomers Had Big Advantages Over Millennials

Millennials wish they had grown up in baby boomers' times – survey

4 Economic Facts to Shut Up any Baby Boomer Saying Millennials Are Lazy | Inverse

How the baby boomers — not millennials — screwed America

 

[buckeye45_73]

He self identifies as a conservative and also doesn’t really understand what being a millennial is. Hmm.

Now granted this is mere anecdotal evidence, but I think it’s safe to say many of the entitled millennials we think of are actually conservative - not liberal. These stereotypical people generally aren’t very bright and have very little past work history. Liberals are basically smarter than this really. They have the self-awareness to not want to be like this guy.

Walking Definition Of An Entitled Millennial Swears He's Not An Entitled Millennial

How is he conservative, because he didn't force his girl to get an abortion?

He is conservative in the sense that he limits his spending ... by letting his parents pay the bills.

LOL, I love it when liberals are so disgusted of their own people or positions, they try and project them on to us.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Seeing that the rich have taken nearly all the wealth and making it next to impossible to afford to move out of the household. Well, I blame the fuckkng rich pigs for making this all too possible.

To get rich, one needs to provide a service for a profit, obtaining that profit through voluntary exchange. By definition, that's not taking, it's exchanging or earning.

Of course, your beloved government circumvents this by stealing our money and redistributing it against our will. That, of course, is actual taking, actual thievery. Do you approve of taxes?

 

[Pete7469]

I self identify as The Emperor of the Western Hemisphere.

Ok...but do you wear clothes?

I'll leave it up for your imagination...