IMPOSSIBLE this and INDISPUTABLE that....

[Fizz]

Twoofers have a problem. i am calling them Twoofers because labeling them as "Truthers" implies that they seek the truth. The truth is that what they seek has nothing to do with the truth. What they seek is to blame the government.

why is it that Twoofers try to provide evidence "unquestionable" instead of asking for honest opinions and investigation into their evidence? anyone with a truly open mind and seeking answers would welcome more information on the evidence they have.

instead we get "its impossible for the plane to be hijacked" without even doing the simplest task of checking to see if the door was actually monitored. we get "indesputable evidence" of thermite rockets (i'm not joking, unfortunately).

why dont the people actually seeking the truth in the Twoofer movement ever think critically about the evidence presented to them by EVERYONE instead of only evidence from the government? as long as the evidence they receive is somehow anti-government they swallow the evidence hook, line and sinker.

stupid sheep.......

 

[Trojan]

This is very true, in the Jesse Ventura crap, they do a superthermite test, paint some on a steel beam and then ohhh and aww over the pyrotechnics -- the person doing the tests ask the question does the fire get hot enough to affect the steel -- rather than answer that question, Ventura goes on this ominous rant of how this paint could be on any building in Chicago, NY or Detroit, etc --- why not answer the important question first --- how powerful is this stuff and what does it do to steel when you apply a layer

the question was ignored for the rest of the show

 

[Terral]

Hi Mr. Fizz:

Twoofers have a problem. i am calling them Twoofers because labeling them as "Truthers" implies that they seek the truth.

No. Mr. Fizz refers to Truthers as Twoofers, because he has no Official Cover Story Case! Period! Let us review the 'evidence:'

1. Empty Shanksville Hole (my Topic):

Yes. That is right! The Empty Hole is still EMPTY and Mr. Fizz has no evidence whatsoever that a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed here.

Mr. Fizz attacks my 'person,' because he cannot even begin to place a real 100-ton Jetliner in this very small EMPTY HOLE. What is his reply to this same EMPTY HOLE being present in the U.S. Geological Survey Photographs?

Click Here

All of the supposed Jetliner Crash workers are looking 'away' from the little EMPTY HOLE, because there is nothing in the EMPTY HOLE even resembling a real 100-ton Jetliner.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s"]Mr. Fizz Has No Evidence To Support The Official Cover Story LIE[/ame]

Well?

Well nothing. Mr. Fizz is here to push Official Cover Story LIES, when 'the' 911Truth is looking him right in the face! But he 'can' call people names ...

The truth is that what they seek has nothing to do with the truth. What they seek is to blame the government.

Explain the EMPTY HOLE!!!!!

why is it that Twoofers try to provide evidence "unquestionable" instead of asking for honest opinions and investigation into their evidence?

Go right ahead and give us Mr. Fizz's Official Govt Explanation for the EMPTY HOLE!!!!

anyone with a truly open mind and seeking answers would welcome more information on the evidence they have.

No sir. Mr. Fizz will continue to defend Loyal Bushie/Obama LIES no matter what anybody says. Period.

My Pentagon Topic:

Here is perhaps the best pre-collapse picture of the Wedge One E-Ring Pentagon outer wall. Note the tall cable spools standing directly in the flight path, but the windows to the left and above the little hole are not even broken!!!!

Here we see Navy and Army Personnel standing in front of the E-ring Wall, but how many are running to save victims of the 100-ton Jetliner Crash? NONE!!! The distance from the outer E-ring Wall to the inner C-Ring Wall is 220 feet ...

... and the 100-ton Jetliner supposedly crashed at a 45-degree angle from the lower right to the upper left. The Official Cover Story LIE says AA77 crashed into this wall going 530 miles per hour, which allows just .39 seconds before the 60-ton Titanium Frame 'and' Two 6-ton Rolls-Royce Engines exited the C-ring Wall:

Okay, Mr. Fizz: Go ahead and explain why we are looking at one little hole??? Where did your 100-ton Jetliner go in less than 4/10ths of one second and going some 530 miles per cotton-picking hour????

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTJehfQkuyE"]These Experts Say No 100-Ton Jetliner Crashed At The Pentagon[/ame]

A real 100-ton Jetliner crashing into the ground floor of the Pentagon would have torn up the pristine Pentagon lawn at 530 miles per hour.

We have a green SUV standing untouched in front of Column Line #8 and ...

... temporary construction trailers standing in the path of the starboard wing and engine on the 45-degree angle flight path. Mr. Fizz pushes the Official Cover Story LIES, because that is exactly what he was sent here to do. Period. Then he has the audacity to call me a 'Twoofer,' which only makes him look more like an Official Cover Story Govt Stooge cool ...

Who is more guilty? The original inside-job murderers like Bush, Rove, Cheney and Rumsfeld, OR those among us helping run diversion for Official Cover Story LIES? Everything will be laid wide open at the Judgment, and everyone helping the inside-job murderers will get their just rewards ...

GL,

Terral

 

[slackjawed]

I say we invest in a box of slinkys. We give them out to people like the above poster, and we won't hear from them for 2 or 3 days.

 

[Fizz]

how many times can they post a picture of a hole with visible airplane parts in and claim it is empty?

if you keep saying it over and over and over again does it then magically become true and you get a happy meal or something?

if you have any "proof" that you think will hold up to scrutiny then tart a new thread and we can discuss it. throwing a dozen pics all in the same thread just makes everything unorganized and confusing as to who is talking about what. so start a thread with one piece of evidence and tell us why you think its evidence and we can tell you why its all bullshit... because everything i have seen from you is absolute bullshit including what you posted above.

 

[Terral]

Hi Mr. Fizz:

how many times can they post a picture of a hole with visible airplane parts in and claim it is empty?

Show us your pictures of Flight 93 crashed ANYWHERE and stop trying to push 'lame' Loyal Bushie/Obama LIES ...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgfzqulvhlQ]The U.S. Govt is LYING and so are you ...[/ame]

GL,

Terral

 

[Fizz]

you already showed us pictures of where it crashed.

 

[Terral]

Hi Mr. Fizz:

Mr. Fizz has no pictures of Flight 93 crashed anywhere like he has no pictures of AA77 crashed anywhere, because nothing like that ever happened on 9/11!!!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm_cnFoMHjA"]This CNN Report Was Made On 9/11!!![/ame]

Now compare the 'little pieces that you can pick up with your hands' testimony to what you hear in this Shanksville News Video Story:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc"]Tiny, Tiny Pieces Of Debris[/ame]

There is nothing there but, "An Empty Hole In The Ground." Here is Mr. Fizz's reply to all of the 'evidence' in my post above ...

you already showed us pictures of where it crashed.

That's it! And for this reason, everyone is supposed to believe George Bush, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft and the other 9/11 Inside-job murderers of innocent Americans!!!!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcfL2jaAVcM"]Video Footage Of The EMPTY HOLE[/ame]

Mr. Fizz has no reply and no answer for the April 20, 1994 U.S. Geological Survey Photographs ...

Click Here Again << Do it!!!

... showing the same EMPTY HOLE. Why? That is easy ...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2THs3oNooM"]Mr. Fizz Is A Govt Cover Story Stooge ...[/ame]

And yes, the Official Govt Evidence still shows the same EMPTY HOLE ...

GL,

Terral

 

[Fizz]

dude, i already showed you it isnt the same "empty" hole in another thread. your "empty" hole has airplane parts in it that are visible in your picture.

95% of the plane were recovered from your "empty" hole and the surrounding area. thats enough evidence right there.


...but there is more. the flight data recorders were recovered from flight 93 and from 77.

...but there is even more!!

DNA from the passengers was recovered at the crash site.

but there is more.

the personal items were recovered from the site.

......but there is still even more.....

the stupid fucking hijacker (relative of yours?) tried to give a message over the public address system but instead announced it over the air traffic control frequency.

so what evidence do you have that the picture you are showing are not of flight 93's crash site?

 

[Terral]

Hi Mr. Fizz:

dude, i already showed you it isnt the same "empty" hole in another thread. your "empty" hole has airplane parts in it that are visible in your picture.

Bullony!!! Mr. Fizz has no pictures of Flight 93 nor Flight 77 crashed ANYWHERE. Period. If anybody wants to believe your idiotic nonsense cuckoo, then good for them (#7-#10).

Terral

 

[Fizz]

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200060-11.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200057-11.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200059-11.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200061-11.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200062-11.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200063-11.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200064-11.jpg