Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are quite right, impeachment can be anything that the Congress deems impeachable. Problem for idiots like you, is that once the impeachment is processed it goes to the Senate where sane people are in charge, and put down all the crazy shit that the left presented....You are a dumbass.The title speaks for itself. Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. trumps impeachment is constitutionally correct.
Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw
Impeachment does not require a crime and Hamilton said as much.
See: Op-Ed: Alexander Hamilton would have led the charge to oust Donald Trump
‘Trumpers will get their way and Trump will be exonerated.
‘But when the next president debases the constitution and abuses his office like Trump, they can look back today who they supported.
Unlike Trumpers if the next president is a democrat and acts like Trump and debases the constitution and abuses his office just like Trump, I will not be a good cultist like the Trumpist, but will stand up for what is right.
Going on the definition of high crimes and misdemeanors:
’The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. Some of these charges were crimes. Others were not. The one common denominator in all these accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office and was unfit to serve.“
https://www.crf-usa.org/impeachment/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors.htm
Abuse of power , among other offense, were considered as impeachable.
The Trumpers puts Trump before the constitution like Putin is above his constitution. Two peas in a pod.
The title speaks for itself. Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. trumps impeachment is constitutionally correct.
Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw
Then, you will have no problem with impeachment proceedings against the next Democrat to hold the office starting within hours of his inauguration?
I agree with the OP ... the House can impeach, and Senate remove from office, for any reason they want to ... it's one of the "checks and balances" built into our constitution ...
My reasoning is that this is a strictly political process, not a judicial one ... to my knowledge, there has never be a case of removal from office accepted by the Federal District Courts ... however, my knowledge is quite limited, so if someone has a reference to an actual court case accepted, I'd be more than happy to read it; and if true, rescind my claims in this post ...
No evidence, no proof, no nothing ... just 2/3's the Senate is all ...
Impeachment does not require a crime and Hamilton said as much.
See: Op-Ed: Alexander Hamilton would have led the charge to oust Donald Trump
‘Trumpers will get their way and Trump will be exonerated.
‘But when the next president debases the constitution and abuses his office like Trump, they can look back today who they supported.
Unlike Trumpers if the next president is a democrat and acts like Trump and debases the constitution and abuses his office just like Trump, I will not be a good cultist like the Trumpist, but will stand up for what is right.
Going on the definition of high crimes and misdemeanors:
’The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. Some of these charges were crimes. Others were not. The one common denominator in all these accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office and was unfit to serve.“
https://www.crf-usa.org/impeachment/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors.htm
Abuse of power , among other offense, were considered as impeachable.
The Trumpers puts Trump before the constitution like Putin is above his constitution. Two peas in a pod.
Stop with the doom and gloom that our democracy is destroyed because the GOP senate acquitted Trump for bullshit charges. Every impeachment is based on a unique set of facts. The democrats pushed a bad impeachment case and got clobbered. It got shoved up their asses sideways.
1. Article-1 is dead because hearsay is not allowed in the senate like it was in the House, and Dershowitz will also prove that the charge doesn't rise to the level needed for impeachment. That is a very high bar.
2. Article-2 is dead because the USSC said that Trump does have due process rights, and that Trump can take House subpoenas to court, as well as claims of "executive privilege".
What the half-baked democrat impeachment against Trump did do was setup every president for impeachment by the House for nonsensical "crimes".
True.The title speaks for itself. Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. trumps impeachment is constitutionally correct.
Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw
The title speaks for itself. Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. trumps impeachment is constitutionally correct.
Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw
This again!!!!!!?!?!
Impeachment must never occur on an opinion. NEVER. This is what happened here. We agree there was a phone call. The phone call transcript was released. Aid to Ukraine was released. Zelensky said he did not feel pressured. Burisma situation is at best questionable in terms of how Hunter got that gig. But in the end we are all speculating and guessing when it comes to Trump’s intent.
The politicians have wasted our money by this bullshit process and people like IM2 racist, do not that the intelligence or education to see that.
People need to wake up.
Say PROGS, which of these are NOT an abuse of power?
1. Obama unconstitutional mandates.
2. Sec. of State doing business with primarily Clinton donors.
3. Democrats, FBI and justice dept. colluding to invent Russian collusion, and presenting false information to the court.
4. IRS singling out Republicans.
5. Spying on an opponent's campaign through govt. authority.
6. Holding back aid from Ukraine pending removal of an inconvenient investigator.
7. Claiming Ukraine is highly corrupt while your son demonstrates a reason why.
8. Falsely claiming Trump is a Russian asset and spy.
No crime is necessary. Read post #6.What crime has he been charged with?Does it require evidence?
No. It just requires an accusation by a lying, anti-American, butt-hurt liberal.
Along with the cooperation by a Criminal In Charge and his merry band of Criminals.
Actually, the Articles of Impeachment are the evidence and proof.I agree with the OP ... the House can impeach, and Senate remove from office, for any reason they want to ... it's one of the "checks and balances" built into our constitution ...
My reasoning is that this is a strictly political process, not a judicial one ... to my knowledge, there has never be a case of removal from office accepted by the Federal District Courts ... however, my knowledge is quite limited, so if someone has a reference to an actual court case accepted, I'd be more than happy to read it; and if true, rescind my claims in this post ...
No evidence, no proof, no nothing ... just 2/3's the Senate is all ...
the country needs evidence the Right doesnt have their head up Trumps fat ass-
To be a criminal, you need a crime.No crime is necessary. Read post #6.What crime has he been charged with?Does it require evidence?
No. It just requires an accusation by a lying, anti-American, butt-hurt liberal.
Along with the cooperation by a Criminal In Charge and his merry band of Criminals.
Do you have the 51 votes for removal yet?the country needs evidence the Right doesnt have their head up Trumps fat ass-
Impeachment does not require a crime and Hamilton said as much.
See: Op-Ed: Alexander Hamilton would have led the charge to oust Donald Trump
‘Trumpers will get their way and Trump will be exonerated.
‘But when the next president debases the constitution and abuses his office like Trump, they can look back today who they supported.
Unlike Trumpers if the next president is a democrat and acts like Trump and debases the constitution and abuses his office just like Trump, I will not be a good cultist like the Trumpist, but will stand up for what is right.
Going on the definition of high crimes and misdemeanors:
’The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. Some of these charges were crimes. Others were not. The one common denominator in all these accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office and was unfit to serve.“
https://www.crf-usa.org/impeachment/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors.htm
Abuse of power , among other offense, were considered as impeachable.
The Trumpers puts Trump before the constitution like Putin is above his constitution. Two peas in a pod.
Stop with the doom and gloom that our democracy is destroyed because the GOP senate acquitted Trump for bullshit charges. Every impeachment is based on a unique set of facts. The democrats pushed a bad impeachment case and got clobbered. It got shoved up their asses sideways.
1. Article-1 is dead because hearsay is not allowed in the senate like it was in the House, and Dershowitz will also prove that the charge doesn't rise to the level needed for impeachment. That is a very high bar.
2. Article-2 is dead because the USSC said that Trump does have due process rights, and that Trump can take House subpoenas to court, as well as claims of "executive privilege".
What the half-baked democrat impeachment against Trump did do was setup every president for impeachment by the House for nonsensical "crimes".
I guess your handler finally got off the crapper and emailed you the response he thought sounded the best. Sorry, it doesn't work. Tell him to try again. And to please keep his crap off his keyboard.
Since the Republican Senate will acquit Trump, the next president will be immune from impeachment for abuse of power because the Senate said abuse power is not impeachable. Nor will the next president be held accountable as he can give the middle finger to Congressional subpoenas. This is the new reality you all have created.The title speaks for itself. Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. trumps impeachment is constitutionally correct.
Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw
Then, you will have no problem with impeachment proceedings against the next Democrat to hold the office starting within hours of his inauguration?
