Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obama is not a communist. He is a puppet of the emerging plutocracy. If you don't understand the difference, say so. I'll be glad to explain it to you.I voted for Obama in 2007. Now I would vote to impeach him for his repeated contempt for the Constitution.
in 2007, what gave you the idea he would honor the Constitution ? Hussein told the citizens of this once great country he was going to "fundamentally change America", so why the fuck did you vote for a know commie.., that is exactly what a community organizer is
There are many. He seems to think because he was a Constitutional scholar he has some special dispensation. If he goes ahead with this Syria threat it will be the biggest. But even if he doesn't there are sufficient examples of his arrogant contempt for Constitutional Law to impeach him. The following is just one recent example:I voted for Obama in 2007. Now I would vote to impeach him for his repeated contempt for the Constitution.
What charges?
I voted for Obama in 2007. Now I would vote to impeach him for his repeated contempt for the Constitution.
I tip my hat to you, you are one the few who admit they made a mistake and voted for that Buffoon .....View attachment 27493
The OP might be the one dumb voter the RW is always harping on.
There are many. He seems to think because he was a Constitutional scholar he has some special dispensation. If he goes ahead with this Syria threat it will be the biggest. But even if he doesn't there are sufficient examples of his arrogant contempt for Constitutional Law to impeach him. The following is just one recent example:I voted for Obama in 2007. Now I would vote to impeach him for his repeated contempt for the Constitution.
What charges?
(Excerpt)
President Obama has shown increasing contempt for the constitutional limits on his power, and the courts are finally awakening to the news. A unanimous panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday that the Presidents non-recess recess appointments are illegal and an abuse of executive power.
On January 4, 2012, Mr. Obama bypassed the Senates advice and consent power by naming three new members of the National Labor Relations Board and appointing Richard Cordray to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Other Presidents have made recess appointments and weve supported that executive authority.
But heres the Obama kicker: He consciously made those recess appointments when the Senate wasnt in recess but was conducting pro-forma sessions precisely so Mr. Obama couldnt make a recess appointment. No President to our knowledge had ever tried that one, no doubt because it means the executive can decide on his own when a co-equal branch of government is in session.
Read more at Court Finally Awakens to Obama's Increasing Contempt for Constitution - Minutemen News
(close)
Obama was elected in 2007. He was inaugurated in 2008. Those are two different things.Are you the typo queen?
Getting an election year wrong isn't a typo.
I voted for Obama in 2007. Now I would vote to impeach him for his repeated contempt for the Constitution.
No you didn't. There was no general election in 07. And, there are no grounds to impeach him.
Yeah, I know the rw "oh he is against the Constitution and wants our bibles and our guns" lies.
I mean REAL crimes.
Obama was elected in 2007. He was inaugurated in 2008. Those are two different things.Are you the typo queen?
Getting an election year wrong isn't a typo.
I disagree!
As long as he and his syncophants are in office, the bigger the chances of a major change in Congress - giving the GOP control of both houses!
It will also put a huge dent in Billary's chances for 2016!!!
I stand corrected. Thanks to all who corrected me and apologies for my error. But the point remains, I voted for his first term and now I would vote to impeach him.Obama was elected in 2007. He was inaugurated in 2008. Those are two different things.Getting an election year wrong isn't a typo.
Obama was elected in 2008. He was inaugurated in 2009. Those are two different things.
I would be content with impeachment, if just to put him in his place. But I believe the Congress could impeach him if they so choose. Whether he's convicted is another thing.There are many. He seems to think because he was a Constitutional scholar he has some special dispensation. If he goes ahead with this Syria threat it will be the biggest. But even if he doesn't there are sufficient examples of his arrogant contempt for Constitutional Law to impeach him. The following is just one recent example:What charges?
(Excerpt)
President Obama has shown increasing contempt for the constitutional limits on his power, and the courts are finally awakening to the news. A unanimous panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday that the Presidents non-recess recess appointments are illegal and an abuse of executive power.
On January 4, 2012, Mr. Obama bypassed the Senates advice and consent power by naming three new members of the National Labor Relations Board and appointing Richard Cordray to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Other Presidents have made recess appointments and weve supported that executive authority.
But heres the Obama kicker: He consciously made those recess appointments when the Senate wasnt in recess but was conducting pro-forma sessions precisely so Mr. Obama couldnt make a recess appointment. No President to our knowledge had ever tried that one, no doubt because it means the executive can decide on his own when a co-equal branch of government is in session.
Read more at Court Finally Awakens to Obama's Increasing Contempt for Constitution - Minutemen News
(close)
Those arent charges, a president cant be impeached because his partisan opposition disagrees with how his Administration interprets the Constitution with regard to the Executive branch. If the House should contrive articles of impeachment based on such charges, the president will not be convicted by the Senate.
Federal courts decide whether or not the Executives actions are Constitutional, and if not the court will enjoin the president from acting in an un-Constitutional manner ongoing.
If, however, a president continues to pursue policies found to be un-Constitutional by a court, in defiance of the court, impeachment could be predicated on a president being held in contempt of that Federal court.
