Impeach Kagan for Breaking the Law!

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by dvinman, Jan 11, 2011.

  1. dvinman
    Offline

    dvinman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    458
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +65
    Impeach Kagan for Breaking the Law!

    Memos in Obama appointed Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s own handwriting indicate she altered evidence in a case before the Supreme Court and coerced witnesses to change their testimony.

    TELL ALL 535 IN THE U.S. SENATE AND HOUSE IMPEACH KAGAN:
    Select Here - SIGN THE PETITION AND FAX THE CONGRESS NOW!!!

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, (ACOG), commissioned an expert panel of scientists to examine the partial birth abortion issue. The panel report stated the ACOG “could identify no circumstances under which this procedure . . . would be the only option to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.”

    Upon receiving this information, Kagan, then acting as the attorney defending Partial Birth Abortion (PBA) for the Clinton Administration, issued the following memo in her own handwriting which noted, “This, of course, would be disaster,” and a handwritten list of “suggested options” that the administration should pursue to pressure the ACOG to replace the original damning statement. Among that handwritten list of “options” is the revised report findings statement on partial-birth abortion, stating PBA "may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman."

    Let’s look at that again:

    Original Report:
    The ACOG “could identify no circumstances under which this procedure, (partial birth abortion), . . . would be the only option to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.”

    Kagan Revised:
    PBA (partial-birth abortion) "may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman."

    ACOG’s panel of scientists never read nor approved Kagan’s “revision”; yet it was this misleading statement, completely opposite the meaning of the ACOG scientists' findings, that was presented to the Supreme Court. And it was this false statement that led the Supreme Court to overturn Nebraska’s Partial Birth Abortion ban and 29 other state laws where We the People forbid this evil, torturous practice of delivering all but a baby’s head, killing the child, then completing the birth of the murdered infant's corpse.

    The evidence is irrefutable, Elena Kagan clearly defrauded the Supreme Court into ruling against the will of the People and in accordance with the wishes of the death-dealing Abortion lobby.

    Impeach Kagan for Breaking the Law
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Jackson
    Offline

    Jackson Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Messages:
    19,627
    Thanks Received:
    4,871
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +12,664
    Do you have a link for this?
     
  3. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,091
    Thanks Received:
    10,149
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,631
    That's disgusting.
     
  4. Ernie S.
    Offline

    Ernie S. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    33,652
    Thanks Received:
    7,711
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Ratings:
    +12,389
    I can hardly wait to hear how this unfolds.
     
  5. JamesInFlorida
    Offline

    JamesInFlorida Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,501
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +184
    I'll wait for more sources to pick up on this, if there is a legit story more organizations will pick up on it, rather than an organization that solely focuses on spinning issues in a conservative light.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Jackson
    Offline

    Jackson Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Messages:
    19,627
    Thanks Received:
    4,871
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +12,664
    If I see this in the news, I'll be one of the first to call for impeachment!
     
  7. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Offline

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,566
    Thanks Received:
    6,673
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,409
    Sounds like a witch hunt to me.
     
  8. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,830
    Thanks Received:
    2,062
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,715
    Wow, she really is a sack of shit. But then again just about every leftist in an office of power is.

    No sense in removing her from the SCOTUS until the Hussein is gone, he'll just replace her with another partisan hack with no ethics.
     
  9. Missourian
    Offline

    Missourian Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    16,281
    Thanks Received:
    4,799
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Missouri
    Ratings:
    +8,124
    Found this on Politico:

    A lot more to read here - Former Surgeon General Koop slams Kagan - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. MaggieMae
    Offline

    MaggieMae Reality bits

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    24,043
    Thanks Received:
    1,599
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,601
    ^^"During her confirmation hearing, Kagan said she did not attempt to get ACOG to change its views on the issue, and she said such an effort would not have been successful."

    I'll wait for information directly from ACOG, which oddly enough was UNDOUBTEDLY required during her Senate confirmation hearings. Why is this being brought up at such a late date should be the question. I guess the anti-Obama spammers have run out of new material.
     

Share This Page